150 - HISTORY OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.


of the year 1776, at first as clerk, and afterwards as receiver-general of quit-rents and purchase money due to the proprietaries, and on this account was well qualified to make the desired estimate. From his statements we shall present some facts relative to the amount of land sold within various periods of years, and also of the quit-rents charged thereon. It appeared by a book in the surveyor-general's office that there had been sold to various persons, called " first purchasers," between the 4th of March, 1681, and October, 1682, the amount of 874,550 acres, exclusive of two entries, one to William Penn, Jr., and Letitia Penn, for 40,000 acres, and the other to William Penn, nephew to the proprietary, for 25,000 acres. This computation includes a sale to the Free Society of Traders of 20,000 acres, and another to the London Company of 60,000 acres. A part of this last-mentioned sale, amounting to 14,049 acres, was surveyed in New Castle County. Between the month of October, 1682, and the year 1701 there was sold the comparatively small amount of 83,0031 acres. This computation includes a sale to the Frankford Company of 25,000, and another to Sir Mathias Vincent, Thompson & Coxe, of 30,000 acres, and is formed for the most part from the records of patents in the recorder's office before the year 1701, no patent-book or account-books of purchase moneys received for lands sold before that time having been kept, either in the secretary or receiver-general's offices. Between the 10th of the 9th month, 1701, and the 7th of December, 1732, there was received as purchase money of common lands in Pennsylvania the sum of £12,610, during which time lands were sold at various prices. Overplus land was often sold for £18 to £25 for 100 acres, and sometimes at prices higher, though seldom lower, and other lands were generally sold at or about £10 for 100 acres but as an exact discrimination cannot with certainty be made, and an admission of £10 per 100 acres will be a moderate rate of computation, it would appear that about 126,100 acres were sold during this period. From the 7th of December, 1732, to the 27th of December, 1762, the common lands were sold at £15 10s. for 100 acres, currency, purchase money, and an half-penny sterling an acre per annum quit-rent, and for some years afterwards for lands which were settled and improved within these times. It appears, from the amount of money received for land sold on these terms, that about 1,385,219 acres were disposed of during these thirty years. On the 27th of December, 1762, the terms were altered to £9 currency for 100 acres, purchase money, and one penny sterling an acre per annum quit-rent, which alteration continued no longer than until the 5th of August, 1763, except in two instances, but from the amount of money received it was estimated that 34,254 acres were sold on these terms. It appears that from Aug. 5, 1763, to 1st of August, 1765, no warrant for vacant unimproved land was issued, and a very few only for improved plantations. On the 1st of August, 1765, the modes and terms of granting lands were again altered. Lands were now granted, on application, on the terms of £5 sterling for 100 acres, purchase money, and one penny sterling per acre per annum quit-rent, which terms continued until on or about the 6th of September, 1769. After this time the mode of granting lands on ap-

plications ceased, and warrants were granted to all appliers for land on the terms last mentioned. It was estimated that between the 1st of August., 1765, and the 6th of September, 1769, there were sold 239,932 acres, and 1,346;004 acres more between the last-mentioned date and the month of December, 1776, after which no more grants of the common lands were made by the proprietaries. Thus the whole amount of land sold for which the money was received was, in round numbers, about 4,075,000 acres.


The grants of land made for an annual quit-rent, without purchase money, were as follows :


To sundry Swedes, for lands claimed by them under rights from. the Duke of York, or by possession and improvement before the date of the royal grant of Pennsylvania to William Penn, as appears by extracts taken from records in the recorder's office and patent-books in the secretary's office, 37,0371 acres.


To sundry persons called renters, as appears from the records in the above-mentioned offices, 90871 acres.


To sundry servants of the first purchasers and adventurers into Pennsylvania, 45714 acres:


To sundry persons not under any of the above descriptions, 7261/ acres.


Total number of acres of rent-lands, 57,9581.


The proprietaries gave away large amounts of land to various branches of their family, as follows: William Penn, before coming to Pennsylvania, conveyed to Sir John Fagg, of Sussex, 50,000 acres in trust for the use of his wife, Gulielma Maria Penn, and her children. Of the latter, only two survived, viz. : William Penn, Jr., and Letitia Penn, to whom the land was ultimately surveyed. It appears by patents and warrants issued in satisfaction of this right that 1250 acres were granted over and above the 50,000, making 51,250, and of this amount about 12,000 acres were surveyed in New Castle County, the remainder in Pennsylvania. To Samuel Carpenter, Isaac Norris, and Edward Penington '7000 acres, part of 12,000 granted to them in trust for the use of John Penn, Esq., the remaining 5000 acres being granted in right of Thomas Callowhill, who was a first purchaser. To the same persons 10,000 acres, to be held by them in trust for the said John Penn, then born, and other children who might be born of Hannah Penn, the last wife of William Penn. William Penn in his will devised to his daughter, Letitia Aubrey, 10,000 acres, and a like amount to each of his three grandchildren,—Gulielma Maria, Springett, and William Penn, the children of' William Penn, Jr. To Thomas Penn, Esq., were granted five separate warrants for 1000 acres each, dated the 12th of May, 1732, and to the same one warrant, dated the 18th of the same month, for 5000 more. To Richard Penn, Esq , five separate warrants for 1000 acres each, dated the 12th of May, 1732. The whole amount of land in Pennsylvania thus granted to different members of the family was 111,250 acres, and, in addition to this, the proprietaries reserved, in right of their tenths, 441,534 acres.


According to the estimate made by Edmund Physick, Pennsylvania contained 27,955,200 acres, and as six per cent. allowance was made for roads, this was added to the whole amount disposed of in the various ways above men-


PROPRIETARY INTERESTS AND LAND TITLES - 151


tioned, and there appeared a balance of 21,592,128 acres, for which nothing had been received by the proprietaries.


The quit-rent charged on land of the first purchasers was at the rate of one shilling sterling for 100 acres, except in the case of large purchases, made by a few individuals or companies, and this was the usual rate until 1732. Many of these first purchasers never came to this country, and some of them never obtained any survey of their land. The greater part of the land, however, was probably laid out between 1682 and 1700 ; but surveys in their right continued to be made at different times until the Revolution, whether after that time we are not informed.


The whole amount of land patented in .Chester County previous to 1779 was set down at 375,0124 acres, but as this statement appears to have been based on an examination of the patent-books, we are inclined to suppose that some of this land may have been in Lancaster County, which at first was a part of Chester. Of course all the land patented in what. is now Delaware County was included in the above amount, and as the present limits of our county embrace more than this amount, it appears that a great part remained unsold, or otherwise not patented.


During the past year there was published by Benjamin H. Smith, of Philadelphia, surveyor, an " Atlas of Delaware County," in which are shown the extent of the patents for land, a great many of the early surveys, with names of successive owners, and the dates of hundreds of conveyances. For patient research and careful preparation, this work is a monument to the author's skill, and a mine of information to the seeker after knowledge respecting the early settlement of that portion of our ancient county.


DEPUTY SURVEYORS FOR CHESTER COUNTY.


Capt. Edmund Cantwell and Walter 'Wharton were surveyors-general under the government of the Duke of York. Richard Noble was commissioned surveyor of Upland County Dec. 15, 1680. The first surveyor for Chester County was Charles Ashcom, with whom there was considerable trouble, and he was at length set aside, in 1686, and Robert Longshore succeeded him. David Powell was, however, the surveyor for the Welsh Tract. Henry Hollingsworth was the deputy for this county, in 1700 and 1701; while Penington was surveyor-general, but was succeeded in the latter year by Isaac Taylor, of Thornbury, whose brother Jacob was the next surveyor-general. Under Isaac Taylor, his son John made many surveys, and received the commission upon the death of the former in '1728. He resigned the position in 1740, after which it may have been that the county was divided into districts. Even before this warrants were frequently directed to other surveyors. John and George Churchman operated extensively in the southwest part of the county, and Samuel, Benjamin, and Thomas Lightfoot in the northern part. Samuel Cochran was commissioned March 8, 1792, to be surveyor for the district comprising the counties of Chester and Delaware, in which office he succeeded Charles Dilworth. James Hindman was commissioned May 17, 1809 ; Arthur Andrews, Jr., Dec. 17, 1813; Emmor Bradley, for Chester County, June 7, 1830 ; Jesse Evans,. Aug. 3, 1836.


RESURVEYS.


Many of the early surveys were executed in a careless manner, and it was discovered after that more land was included within the lines than should be. There appears to have been an effort to correct these errors at an early date. William Penn, on the 1st of 2d month, 1686, instructed his commissioners,—


" That no warrant of resurvey be granted by you for land within five miles of the river Delaware or any navigable river. That all overplus lands, upon resurveys granted by the former commissioners, not already granted finally or not patented, be reserved to my use and disposal. No lands to be laid out next or adjoining to that inhabited, and that in every township one share be reserved for the Proprietary, with all the Indian fields that are in the said township."


There was probably but little done in the matter until after the proprietary's second visit to the province. A law of property was passed at New Castle in 1700, and confirmed in 1701, which enacted, among other things,—


"That any person's lands in this province should be resurveyed, and if upon such resurvey (after allowance of four acres in the hundred, over or under, for difference of surveys, and six per cent. for roads) an overplus shall be found, the possessor thereof should have the refusal of it from the Proprietary at reasonable rates; and in case of disagreement about such rates, the Proprietary was to choose two men, and the possessor two more, who should either fix a price on the said overplus land or appoint where it should be taken off for the Proprietary, in one entire piece at an outside (saving to the purchaser or renter his improvements and best conveniencies), any three of whom agreeing should be conclusive; and the charges of resurveying should be borne by the purchaser or renter of the main tract, if he bought the overplus, or if not, then by the Proprietary; and that deficiencies should be made good by the Proprietary, according as he received for overplus land as aforesaid."


This act caused great dissatisfaction, and in the Assembly's address, from which extracts have already been given, it is said that, " under pretence of passing an act for confirming and securing their lands, etc., thou obtained liberty to resurvey all the lands in the province, and to bring the people to terms for the overplus ; so that by this stratagem the warrants, surveys, and new patents cost the people as much, and to some more, than the first purchase of their lands, beside their long attendance upon thy secretary and surveyors to have their business done."


Many resurveys were made and overplus land found, as also some deficiencies, but the act expired before all the cases were adjusted, and in 1712 another act was passed relating to property which revived the matter, but this was repealed in Council 20th of February, 1713; After this the subject was dropped, as far as related to payments for overplus lands in early surveys.


A warrant was directed to Isaac Taylor, 25th of 1st month, 1700-1, ordering him to resurvey the townships of Chichester, Bethel, Concord, and Birmingham.


The following matter relating to resurveys comes next in the order of time :


" PHILAD'IA, 26th 9br, 1702.


"ISAAC TAYLOR, Loving ffrd:


"Inclosed herewith is copies, one of a War't for John Buckley, in Rocklands, who desired it might be directed to thee, ye other for the Proprietor's use, which, by all means, I would have executed in ye first part of it, viz.: Surveying Stockdale's plantation and dividing ye Gov'rs land from that troublesome man Jim. Grubb; ye other thou may take some more time to consider of, viz.: Ye laying out d000 acres, at least till we meet when that shall be.


"I send also a commission to John Buckley, which pray deliver.


152 - HISTORY OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.


"The comm'rs, upon application made by & non-agreement with Joseph Sharpless, have ordered that thou shall cutt off from his tract lately resurveyed, the 90 acres of overplus found therein, which pray .1! form as much to ye Prop'rs advantage as may be; the law being still observed in case he will agree- to what is reasonable; if not we must appoint, two men, one besides thyself, & he two others, to determine where the line shall be run.


"Pray press on ye. Resurveys where thou thinks there is occasion, for in other places I think, considering the narrowness of time, they may be best forborn, & shortly I shall send thee another. Gen'l Warr't, le haps by this, opportunity.


"I must again press thee to lett nothing divert thee from the Woods and ye Chain, for following of that I hope will be almost thy only. employment for this year to come.


"I have never yet, that I can call to mind, received one line from thee on any awl, which I think is strange; pray fail not to inform me of whatever may be of use to know in that County. Assuring thyself that I am, in all sincerity, Thy real loving ffrd.


"JAMES LOGAN.


"30th, 9br.


"I Must further add to ye aforegoing That ye Comm'rs having sold and Granted Jno. Bowater 400 acres, to be laid out in that Tract formerly designed for Gr. Jones, The Warr't is directed to thee, which should be executed with care without any culling or choosing, for that was an unreasonable Grant (250 of it I mean), & much ag'st my mind; but endeavor that no notice be taken of it among those of your county.


"If thou canst conveniently meet with T. Pierson, pray discourse him about coming up to resurvey. I doubt this county will be too hard for thee, & therefore believe that this with that may employ him for some considerable time. . . . Thy real ffrd, as before,

"J. LoGAN."


A warrant, signed the commissoners, was directed to Thomas Pierson, surveyor of New Castle County, in the following language :


" ffor ye Better Discovery of such overplus Land as by ye Carelessness of surveyors have been left in several Tracts formerly laid out or taken up in Christina Hundred in ye County of New Castle, & in severall townships of ye County of Chester in this. Gov'mt. These are to authorize and Require thee to resurvey Exactly and according to art, and by ye lines as near as may be by which they were at first respectively granted or Laid out, all such 'tracts of Land within ye said Christina Hundred in ye sd County of New Castle; also all such Tracts within any of ye Townships of Darby, Ridley, Springfield, Marple, and Newtown in ye County of Chester, as may be judged to have been irregularly or unduly surveyed or measured at or before ye first Grant thereof, or may now be presumed to contain any Quantity of land above ye number of acres they were at first laid out for, Granted, or reputed, and make particular returns of Every such Tract as thou shalt find such overplus in, also Gen'l Returns, as near as may be, of ye whole sd Hundred and whole sd Townships, into ye Gen'l Surveyor's office at Philad'ia, where this warrant is to remain and a copy thereof to be Deliv'd to thee, certified by ye Secretary. Given under our hands and ye seal of ye Province at Philad'a ye 4, 11 mo, 1702."


"PHILA. 14, 2, 1703.


" Loving frd. I. T. I lately sent thee a war't for 475 acres to he laid out near T. Buffington, [for Abiah Taylor,] which if not yet executed, I desire thee to add to it five acres more to complete his purchase, there being but twenty acres allowed for his liberty land.


"Pray goe on with the Resurveys with all expedition proceeding to the Townships of Thornbury, Edgem't and :Westtown, as far as the first Range of Lotts in ye sd Townships : run without touching with ye Lands entered by ye Welsh, for which thou shalt have a Warr't either accompanying this or sent after.


"H. Hollingsworth undertakes Middletown, having particularly requested, and thou appeared not onely careless but of opinion it would not answer, which induced me to employ him, together with the backwardness of that county.


"Pray inform e first what thou knows of R. Whitpain's Land in Westtown, what ye quantity is & whether not broke in upon.


"I am Thy real frd. -    J. LOGAN."


A warrant was directed to Isaac Taylor on the 27th of 2d month, 1703, ordering him to resurvey all the tracts not yet resurveyed 'in the townships of Aston, Thornbury, Edgemont, Westtown, and Ridley. Another warrant to Isaac Taylor, Thomas Pierson, and Henry Hollingsworth, dated 20th 3d month, 1703, directed them to resurvey all ye lands " within ye whole Bounds of ye sd County of Chester and mannor of Rocklands."


"ISAAC TAYLOR.

" Loving frd: Upon the renewed application of. Robert Wharton, these are to inform thee (which notwithstanding I suppose is needless,) that the instructions I gave thee to defer the execution of his and other warr'ts was only to event the loss of time about Resurveys, and therefore if thou- canst find an opportunity that will be no hindrance at all to the other, thou shalt have our three consent, but would not have those material points postponed. I must also inform thee that I believe we must of necessity gett thee and Henry to extend your works up to Schuylkill, and then you will take in all between that river and Brandywine. D. Powell fails us notwithstanding his engagements, having putt off so long that he will not be able to go throw with it. The Welsh Tract being done by him is excepted.


" Pray your thoughts on this V first that you may have a warr't

from Thy Loving frd  JAMES LOGAN.

" PHILAD'IA 12, 8br 1703."


MANORS AND PROPRIETARY RESERVATIONS.


By the ninth article of " Conditions and Concessions" the proprietary reserved to himself 10,000 acres in every 100,000, and this was to be by lot, and to lie in but one place. This agreement was afterwards held to relate only to the first purchasers, and the same may be said of all conditions and concessions, but it does not appear tha there ever were any others agreed upon. As early per haps as 1686 an attempt was made to locate such a reservatiion in Chester County, as appears by draughts of adjoining lands, and, as near as can be determined; it must have bee intended to embrace, a considerable portion of. what is now West Bradford township. This, however, was abandoned and at the time of William Penn's second visit to the province, nothing more had been done in the matter. The following warrant was directed to the surveyor of Cheste County :

"According to the Primitive Regulation for laying out Lands in the Province, by which it was provided that one tenth part of all the lands therein surveyed should be appropriated to the Pro


{SEAL} prietary thereof, And by virtue of a warrant pursuant thereto under the hand and seal of the Proprietary Governour, to me directed, bearing date the 1st day c September, 1700.


"I do hereby authorize and require thee to survey and lay out t the said Proprietary's proper use and behoof, and of his heirs after him, five hundred acres in every Township, consisting of five thousand acres that shall be surveyed, and generally one tenth part of all th lands that shall be laid out in the county of Chester ; and make du Returns thereof with a protracted figure of the field work into Da. office, which are by the Proprietary and Governour's order to remain there. Given under my hand and seal at Philadelphia the 4th day the 8th month, 1700.


EDW'D PENINGTON, Stria'. GEN.


"To HENRY HOLLINGSWORTH, Deputy Surveyor."


On the back of the original of the above appears this indorsement : " 500 in Marlburrow 5, 2 mo, 1701." In list of proprietary reservations, prepared by. Edmund Phy sick about the year 1784, the following tracts are -given a being in Chester County : A strip of- land between Pike land and Charlestown, 275 acres, 145 perches; a tract in


PROPRIETARY INTERESTS AND LAND TITLES - 153


Marlborough of 500 acres ; 210 acres and 120 perches in Tredyffrin ; a tract in Fallowfield of 500 acres ; a tract on Schuylkill River, joining Bilton Manor, 160 acres ; a tract in West Caln township, 772 acres ; a tract called Springton Manor, 10,000 acres ; 63 acres in East Nantmeal ; 2 tracts in Caln township and one in Sadsbury, each containing 500 acres. These amount, in the aggregate, to less than 14,000 acres, thus falling very far short of one-tenth of the land in the county. The list is perhaps incomplete, as appears by the following information, obtained from other sources. In Nottingham township, which was laid out in 1702, five lots of 490 acres each were reserved by surveys made on the 11th, 13th, 14th, and 15th days of 3d month, 1702, in pursuance of a warrant dated 7th of 1st month, 1701. Some, if not all, of these tracts may have been. cut off by Mason and Dixon's line and left in Maryland. The tract in Tredyffrin was surveyed 26th of 2d month, 1765, by warrant of the 13th of the same month, in the name of Israel Davis. That on Schuylkill, joining the manor of Bilton, was surveyed 21st of January, 1733, by warrant of the 16th of the same month, and was in what is now Schuylkill township. The strip of land between Pikeland and Charlestown became a part of the latter township, but it appears to have been surveyed in ten different pieces. The 772 acres in West Caln were surveyed 20th of October, 1733, and of this 40 acres were sold to Jeremiah Piersall. Of the two other tracts in Caln, of 500 acres each, one was surveyed 30th of June, 1703, near what is now the northeast corner of Valley township. The other is in West Brandywine, and was probably laid out 4th of November, 1708, as it appears by Isaac Taylor's account that he surveyed such an amount at that date. Another tract was surveyed 9th of 2d month, 1703, on Beaver Creek, or one of its branches, near where it crosses the southern line of East Brandywine, but this was probably abandoned for a better location. The tract in Fallowfield was surveyed Oct. 13, 1714, and that in Sadsbury on the 31st of May, 1709.


With the exception of Springton Manor, none of these reservations were of much size, and even this was small, compared with some of the reservations in other counties. In York County a tract called Maske Manor contained 43,500 acres, and Springetsbury Manor, in the same county, including a tract on which Yorktown stood, and another tract of 2000 acres, contained 64,520 acres. As the adjoining lands became settled and improved these tracts increased in value, and about the year 1740 those in Chester County were estimated to be worth from thirty-five to forty pounds per hundred acres, or from two to three times as much as the common lands had been sold for. Although the Penns held these reservations as private property, they were not willing that they should be taxed for purposes of common defense, and this was the occasion for long and tedious disputes between the Assembly and different Governors of the province.


The manor of Springton, or Springtown, as it was generally written, included nearly, if not quite all, the present township of Wallace, and also portions of the southeastern parts of Honeybrook and West Nantmeal. The south line of the manor remains as the north line of East and West


- 20 -


Brandywine, but the other sides consisted of' many courses and distances, none of which appear on our county map. It is rather to be regretted that Springton, or Springtown, was not adopted as the name of the township, which coincided so nearly with the extent of the old manor. We have, however, a lingering reminder in the name of the church and post-office of Brandywine Manor.


The earliest mention of the name which has come to notice is under date of March 6, 1700, and appears as a memorandum of an order for survey, thus: " 100,000 acres (qr. if not designed for 10,000), in one tract the nearest of Land, unsurveyed in the County of Chester, to be erected into a manor, and called by the name of Spring-town in Lieu of one formerly laid out."


The manor formerly laid out was probably the one before referred to as embracing a large part of West Bradford. In 1709 a tract was surveyed " at the great meadow," on branch of Pickering Creek, and in the draught is represented as adjoining to the " Reputed Manor of Springtown." This location was probably abandoned on account of interfering with earlier surveys. On the 9th of 2d month, 1714, James Steel writes to Isaac Taylor that " Secretary Logan Desires thee to give him the best account thou can of the mannor of Springtown," and " Thou art alsoe desired to reserve some Land in that county for the Prop'r, & that the said mannor of Springtown may be found there." On the 17th of 7th month following he writes :


"Secretary Logan had thy letter but having took Physick this day could not answer it, he says thou need not lay out any more of what thou writ to him about., but be sure to remember Springtowne."


In a memorandum-book appears the following entry by John Taylor, under date of March 18, 1729-30 : " finished Springtowne manor."


The following correspondence, relating to this and some other matters of interest, is given in full:


" PHILADELPHIA, 14 12th mo., 1729-30. "My Friend Jno. TAYLOR,


" When thou was last here, as well as before, I particularly recommended to thee that unfortunate manor of Springtown, which has been no less than three several times in as many different places laid out, and is the only spott left in the county of Chester, to answer the holding expressed in every patent for land granted in it; yet Lam., told, tho' I hope tis a mistake, that thou hast made some surveys of late in ye tract last surveyed for it, particularly for one Green, (if I remember the name right,) as also for some others, which can never be allowed for the reason above mentioned. If ye survey of that mannor be not yet in ye office Pray return it without delay, that it

may at length be secured. . . .


"Thy real friend,

"J. LOGAN."


In the above letter reference is made to the fact that every patent for land in Chester County contains the statement that the same is held " as of the manor of Spring-town." This is not strictly true, however, as will be seen by the patent for a tract. including the township of Kennet, and which extended into the county of New Castle, hence was held " as of our manor of Rocklands." The idea seems to have been that the manor was the seat of the chief " lord of the fee," and the other lands were held as dependencies thereof.


"Friend JOHN TAYLOR,


" Being informed that several persons have settled themselves on the tract of Land called Springtown manor, in Chester county, without.


154 - HISTORY OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.


any license for their soe doing, the Proprietor has ordered me to request thee to charge those people to desist and forbear making any further spoile, for he will not suffer any of those tracts laid out for mannors, to be settled, without his consent first obtained for such purpose, and that they must without delay remove from thence, or they will be prosecuted as the law directs.

"Thy friend,

"JAMES STEEL.


" PHILADELPHIA 7th, 9br, 1732."


" My Friend J. TAYLOR,


" I waited on the Prop'r with thy Letter in favour of Mich'l Graham. He was pleased to say that those who are settled on Springton mannor, and can readily pay for the Land they incline to hold, may have Grants for the same, at or about the price which the two 500 acre lots in that neighborhood, belonging to the Prop'rs were sold for. But as there often happens to be a great inequality in the goodness of large Tracts of Land, it is not to be doubted but the like difference will appear in this, and therefore those who are settled on the best spots ought to pay in proportion to its goodness, and those on the most ord'nary, in like manner an abatement should be made, and for that purpose the Prop'r would have each Lot or settlement noated as well in respect of the goodness as quantity, the better to enable him in fixing the different rates or prices. He desires thee to acquaint the People of these Terms and those that cannot comply must remove from thence. I am thy real, loving friend,

"J. STEEL.

"Those two lots were sold for 145      ct.


"PHILADELPHIA, 22d —mo., 1737."


"To Mr. JOHN TAYLOR,


"Sir :—I have it on charge from the Proprietary to desire that immediately, or so soon as you can conveniently, you will examine and adjust the lines of the manor of Springton, and divide the whole into Tracts of, two hundred acres or thereabouts, that being the quantity His Honour would have all the plantations on the monor to consist of, or within a little of it, according to the nature of the place, except where ye mill stands and there is to be at least seven hundred acres Laid out, or more, if when you come to lay it out, you shall think proper, and all this you are to do without regard to any improvements that have been presumed to be made within the Bounds of the manor.


"If you are obstructed in the making any lines that may be necessary to answer the Proprietor's purpose, in the above order, it is His Honour's express direction, that you apply to the next Justice of the Peace for such Warrants and commitments as the Laws of this Province direct them to issue in cases of intrusion and Tortious Entry, or Breaches of the Peace.


" I am your Humble servant,

"RICHARD PETERS.


"SECRETARIES OFFICE 26th October, 1739."


"My Friend JOHN TAYLOR,

"Since I last parted with thee (which I think was at Chester,) our Proprietor has frequently asked me if the manor of Springton was yet divided and the vacant lands in that neighborhood, Coventry and Nantmell, viewed and described as was desired to be done by thee. To which I could only answer him in the terms by thee given at Chester, viz.: that so soon as the weather was fit to go into the woods for that purpose, thou would without further delay finish that work, but not having heard anything since relating thereunto, I now again request thee that if it be not already done, it may no longer be delayed.

"Thy assured friend,

"J. STEEL.


"PHILADELPHIA 23d 2d mo., 1640."


"May it please your Honor,


"Upon my return from the woods last night I received James Steel's letter of the 6th inst., signifying that your Honour required me to bring you in a week's time a Draught of Springtown mannor, with the divisions therein, as also Draughts of all your vacant Lands in the Townships of Coventry and Nantmell.


"The last part of this demand is more than any one surveyor can comply with in a month's time, and is ten times as much as your Honour ever before gave me in charge, your directions being only for Draughts of Lands taken up by Nutt and Branson, which were accordingly prepared.


"But the danger of your displeasure in case of failure in any part, as signified in James Steel's letter, instead of hurrying me on so vast a Task, has given me an entire discharge from all Drudgery of the kind, and I have no more to do than to wish you a better surveyor than one who is notorious to have done more for your interest, when your affairs seemed to call for the strictest assiduity, than any surveyor now living, and I can wish your Honour no greater felicity than to be as well pleased and easy as I am.

"Your most humble servant,

"JOHN TAYLOR.


"CHESTER, May 12th, 1740."


SERVANTS' OR HEAD LAND.


Those who came into the province as servants were to be allowed, at the end of their service, to take up fifty acres of land at a rent of one half-penny sterling per acre per annum. This offer was held out by Penn as an inducement to a poor but industrious class of persons to become settlers in the new colony ; but this privilege was allowed to such only as came in with the first purchasers. Many who thus came as servants afterward became among the most useful members of society, and some attained to prominent positions in government. The term of servants was not confined to such as performed the most common drudgery, but was applied to those who labored at any trade or calling for, a certain salary. Thus Richard Townsend, a person of some note in the early settlement of the province, as a carpenter, was servant to the Society of Traders for five years, at a salary of £50 per annum. We are inclined to suspect that, in order to secure the benefit, the meaning of the term was sometimes stretched in its application as far as it would bear. The land thus obtained was called head-land, and, as previously stated, the whole' amount surveyed for the right of servants was 4571i acres. The warrants of survey were sometimes in this style :

" Whereas, A. B. hath made it appear that he came into this province with the first adventurers a servant to C. D., and hath thereupon requested that we would grant him to take up his proportion of headland," etc.


Some of them contain the words " in the townships allotted to servants," and there may have been a township at first intended for such a purpose, but it was not in Chester County. One warrant runs thus:


" At the Request of John Baldwin that we would grant him to take up one hundred acres of head-land at one half-penny sterling Rent acre, annum, fifty thereof in right of his own service to Joshua Hastings and fifty in right of his wife Katherine, serv't to John Blunston. These are to authorize and Require thee to survey and lay out to the said John Baldwin the said number of one hundred acres of Land in the Tract appropriated to Servants or elsewhere in the province not already surveyed nor taken up," etc. Dated 30th 4 mo., 1702.


This land was surveyed in Caln township, as was also 150 acres more, but beyond this the township does not appear to have been " appropriated to servants." John Baldwin was a merchant residing in Chester, and in the assessment of 1722 his estate stands the third in value in a list of over sixty tumbles in that township. Isaac Taylor purchased the rights of fourteen servants, amounting to 700 acres, and of this 500 acres were laid out, at several surveys, on the east branch of Brandywine, in East Bradford, just north of the Strasburg road, and the other 200 acres in Marlborough, not far from the present village of Unionville. 800 acres were laid out in Sadsbury, and 250 in Bensalem (a short-lived township), all in right of ser-






PROPRIETARY INTERESTS AND LAND TITLES - 155


vants. The aggregate of these surveys amounts to 2000 acres, from which it appears that a good proportion of the servants' land was located in Chester County.


QUIT-RENTS.


As quit-rents have become obsolete, and many persons are ignorant of their nature, a short explanation may not be out of place here. They appear to have originated from the feudal system, under which all the land was supposed to belong to the king, and those who occupied lands were allowed to do so in consideration of personal services of various kinds, but chiefly those of a military character. These services were not always rendered immediately to the king, but often to an intermediate class, as the barons, who in turn were tenants under the king. From this arose the custom of paying a fee or fine in lieu of personal service, and by a quit-rent it is to be understood that the tenant goes quit or free of further service. In the course of time this institution, like many others, lost much of its original significance, and at the time William Penn sold lands in his province quit-rents were probably regarded merely as a judicious method for securing a revenue. He says, in his proposals to the early purchasers,—


"The shares I sell be certain as to the number of acres; that is to say, every one shall contain five thousand acres; the price one hundred pounds; and for the quit-rent, one English shilling, or the value of it yearly, for a hundred acres; which Such as will, may now, or hereafter buy off to an inconsiderable matter; but as I hold by a small rent of the King, so all must hold of me by a small rent for their own security," etc.


This privilege of buying off the quit-rents to a small amount was embraced by some of the early purchasers of large amounts of land in Pennsylvania, but does not appear to have been continued by William Penn's successors. The early settlers regarded them as a grievance, and avoided paying them as much as possible, so that the collectors were often obliged to have recourse to the law to compel payments. In a letter to Thomas Lloyd, dated 7th month, 1686, Penn complains that, although his quit-rents were in value at least £500 per annum at that time, yet he could not get one penny. A list was kept by the receiver-general of all the owners of land, with the situation, number of acres, etc., and this was called the rent-roll. By the terms of the charter, Pennsylvania was to be held by William Penn,—


" In free and common soccage by fealty only, for all services and not in capite, or by knight service; yielding and paying therefore to us, our heirs and successors, two Beaver skins, to be delivered at our castle of Windsor, on the first day of January in every year; and also the fifth part of all gold and silver ore which shall, from time to time, appear to be found within the limits aforesaid, clear of all charges."


Some of the early purchasers obtained their lands from Penn at a merely nominal quit-rent, and the grants to the different branches of the family were on similar terms. Thus 10,000 acres are set down at an Indian corn, and 40,000 at a red rose for each 10,000 acres. The London company purchased 60,000 acres, on which the quit-rent was to be two beaver-skins per annum, while the Society of Traders obtained 20,000 acres, and other purchasers 101,760 more, at a quit-rent of one shilling for each thou sand acres. By the patent-books it appears that the land in Chester County was patented, under various quit-rents, in the following amounts : At one shilling per hundred acres, 262,031i ; at one shilling per thousand acres, 13,524 ; at a penny per acre, 3933; at a half-penny per acre, 86,612f ; at a bushel of wheat per hundred acres, 5904 ; various tracts of 200, 93, 73, 202, 201i, 200, 400, 200, and 10 acres at one shilling each 900 acres at a peppercorn ; 124 at three bushels of wheat ; 491 at 10 bushels, and 2/ at one bushel ; 113 acres at £2 16s. 6d.


The act vesting the estates of the proprietaries in this Commonwealth abolished all quit-rents payable to them except in the tenths or reserved manors, and in these, we suppose, the owners have bought them off, or otherwise the custom has fallen into disuse. The township of Newlin was originally surveyed to the Free Society of Traders, who held their land at a quit-rent of one shilling per thousand acres, yet Nathaniel Newlin, who purchased the tract, sold the land at a higher rate of quit-rent, which was reserved to himself and his heirs, to whom it was paid for a long time. Of course there was nothing to prevent any one from selling land with such a reservation to himself and his heirs, provided he could find a purchaser, but under the circumstances the term of quit-rent would have none of its original meaning. We have something of a similar nature in irredeemable ground-rents.


TOWNSHIP SURVEYS.


From the " Conditions and Concessions," before referred to, it appears to have been a part of the original plan to lay out the province in regular townships of five or ten thousand acres, and the clause " according to the method of townships appointed" was inserted in the warrants of survey. It must soon have been found impossible to preserve regularity, yet this clause was continued in the warrants until after the Revolution. In a letter to the Marquis of Halifax, dated 9th of 12th month, 1683, Penn says,—


"I suppose we may be 500 farmers strong. I settle them in villages, dividing five thousand acres among ten, fifteen or twenty families, as their ability is to plant it."


In Bucks and what is now Montgomery County there was rather more regularity in the township lines than- in Chester County. Concord township, as originally laid out in 1683, probably represented the proprietary's ideal in this matter, as it contained a street or road through the centre from north to south, and the sub-divisions were all laid out with a proportionate width of front on the street, the whole comprising 6000 acres, but an addition has since been made to the southwest corner, destroying its rectangular form. The settlers were generally allowed to take up lands where they pleased, and the method of townships was soon lost sight of. There is now no township in Chester County which was laid out as suck originally, though some of them, as Westtown and the two Pikelands, preserve the lines of early surveys. Marlborough was the only one within our present limits which appears to have been laid out according to method, but by the addition of adjoining land the original form is lost. Marlborough was laid out in 1700 and 1701, and contained a street running east and west through the middle, while the line separating the lands


156 - HISTORY OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.


of the different purchasers ran north and south from the street to the edge of the township. A public road occupies the place of the street, and is well known as the Marlborough Street. Other large tracts were laid out for individuals and companies, which eventually became townships, as was the case with New Garden, Londongrove, Newlin, Pikeland, and Vincent. The formation of townships and counties proceeded, in general, in a somewhat similar manner. As the settlements extended, and the inhabitants became sufficiently numerous for purposes of civil organization, new townships were established. The boundaries, however, often remained indefinite for a long time, until the inhabitants would petition the court, setting forth that they labored under great disadvantages thereby, and praying that the lines might be settled. It would be a matter of interest now to know who suggested the various names, and the times when they were first adopted, but in many cases these can only be inferred. In that part of Chester now included in Delaware County the township lines were established early, and have remained, with but little alteration, to this time, while in our present county the process of division and construction is still in operation.


BOUNDARY LINES.


MASON AND DIXON'S LINE.


THE southern boundary of Chester County exhibits some striking peculiarities. Its eastern end consists of an arc of a circle, commencing at the Delaware, and ending at a point where it strikes the north-and-south line separating the States of Delaware and Maryland. From this point it runs north to the northeast corner of Maryland, in latitude 39̊ 43' 26.3", and thence westward on that parallel. This peculiar line is one of our " geographical celebrities," the exact history of which is known to but few, even of our citizens. Why the line between, Pennsylvania and Delaware is a curved line, how happens that curious little peak, running down to a point, between the circular boundary of Delaware on the one side and the eastern boundary of Maryland on the other, and why the line from that westward is on that odd parallel of latitude, are questions which we shall endeavor to answer briefly. What has been written upon the subject of the boundary lines between Pennsylvania and Maryland during disputes which lasted more than a century, and as a historical review thereof, is so voluminous that it is difficult to give a fair synopsis within the limits of this work.


Before attempting a detailed explanation it may be well to show what points we wish to prove, which are these : The circular line of Delaware arises from the charter to William Penn being limited in that direction to twelve miles from New Castle, then claimed by the Duke of York. The line dividing the peninsula between Maryland and Delaware resulted from an attempt to " split the difference" between contending proprietors. The southern line of Chester County, bordering on Maryland, was fixed by agreement at fifteen miles southward of the southern part of Philadelphia City, as then laid out. Other points will appear hereafter.


The Dutch, as has been shown, made a settlement near the mouth of Lewes Creek in 1631, but this was utterly destroyed by the Indians, perhaps in less than a year thereafter, and no other actual settlement made on that side of the bay or river until, the arrival of the Swedes in 1638. On June 20, 1632, Charles I. granted a patent to Caecilius Calvert, Baron of Baltimore, Ireland, in effect for all the present State of Maryland, and including what is now Delaware, and limited to the northward by the fortieth degree of latitude. By the words of the charter he was restricted to lands hitherto unsettled or uncultivated (hactenus inculta), and the previous, though unfortunate, settlement of the Dutch was afterwards made the pretext for excluding Lord Baltimore from that part of the peninsula lying on Delaware Bay. When, in 1634, he took possession of his territory it was uninhabited by civilized men, and had he then made a settlement on the Delaware there would have been no trouble. He did not do so, and the Swedes in 1638 settled thereon and prospered. In 1655 the Dutch took possession by force, and dated back their title to the first settlement in 1631. In 1659, Governor Fendall, on behalf of the proprietary of Maryland, protested against the Dutch occupation, and in a conference which ensued the commissioners on this side suggested the division of the peninsula, to which the Marylanders refused to listen, but, not being prepared to enforce their claims by arms, nothing more than remonstrance was attempted.


On March 12, 1664, Charles II. gave to his brother James, Duke of York, a patent for the territory extending from the east side of Delaware Bay northward and eastward, including the Hudson River, Long Island, etc., and the latter by conquest extended his jurisdiction also over the western shore of the Delaware. The Dutch recaptured their territory in 1673, but surrendered it in the following year, and a new grant was made to the Duke of York, June 29, 1674, for the same premises. When, in 1680, William Penn was pressing his application for a grant of land, some correspondence was held between the secretary of the Lords' commissioners of trade and plantations and Sir John Werden, agent for the Duke of York. The duke had expressed a wish to reserve the territory


BOUNDARY LINES - 157


twenty or thirty miles northward of New Castle, and Penn, on the other hand, had suggested twelve miles, but the following letter, dated Nov. 23, 1680, will explain the situation more fully :


"Sir,—Mr. Penn having often fallen into discourse with me of his concerns in America since I wrote to you on Saturday, I have told him the substance of what I wrote, and he seems to fear that if his south limits be rightly set at twenty or thirty miles north from New Castle Town he shall have so little of the river left as very much to prevent the hopes he hath of improving the rest within his patent ; but, on the other side he is willing that twelve English miles north of New Castle be his boundary, and believes the distance will fall under the beginning of the fortieth degree of latitude; I have already signified to you all I know of the Duke's mind herein, which is in general to keep some convenient distance from New Castle northwards for a boundary to that colony. But I confess I do not understand why it is precisely necessary to insist on just such a number of miles, more or leis, in a country of which we know so little, and when all the benefits are intended to this patentee which others enjoy ; so as I submit this point to their Lordships' consideration, and do not think it material to add more at present from


"Your very affectionate Friend and Servant,


"Jo. WERDEN."


The bounds were therefore fixed at the distance of twelve miles from New Castle, but when Penn's commissioners arrived in the province an unexpected difficulty arose. It was discovered that Lord Baltimore's patent, if extended to the fortieth degree of latitude, would include the proposed site of the city of' Philadelphia, and leave no valuable harbor in Pennsylvania. To remedy this defect, Penn applied for and obtained from the Duke of York a deed for New Castle and the territory twelve miles around it, dated Aug. 24, 1682; and by another deed of the same date became the owner of the territory extending southward from this to the Whorekills, otherwise called Cape Henlopen. To this land the duke had really at the time no right except by conquest, yet it was subsequently confirmed to him by the king, which confirmation inured to the benefit of his grantee. Meanwhile, Lord Baltimore protested against this disposal of lands within his charter, and finally, the duke having succeeded his brother as king, it was decided by his Council, Nov. 7, 1685,—


" That for avoiding further differences, the tract of land lying between the Bay of Delaware and the Eastern Sea on the one side, and the Chesapeake Bay on the other, be divided into equal parts, by a line from the latitude of Cape Henlopen to the fortieth degree of North latitude, the Southern boundary of Pennsylvania by Charter,—and that the one-half thereof lying toward the Bay of Delaware and the Eastern Sea, be adjudged to belong to His Majesty, and the other half to the Lord Baltimore, as comprised in his Charter."


The decrees of royalty not being as debatable just then as they have been since, of course the recent conveyance of the eastern half of the peninsula to William Penn by His Majesty while Duke of York was regarded as entirely valid. This decree, however, did not remove the difficulty existing between the proprietaries, for the true situation of Cape Henlopen was still uncertain, and the middle of the peninsula was yet to be ascertained.


The occurrence of death among the parties, and the existence of a litigious spirit, protracted the dispute until the 10th of May, 1732, when an agreement was entered into by the sons of William Penn and Charles Lord Baltimore, great-grandson of the original patentee of Maryland. They mutually agreed :


"That a semicircle should be drawn at twelve English statute miles around New Castle, agreeably to the deed of the Duke of York to William Penn, in 1682; that an East and West line should be drawn beginning at Cape Henlopen—which was admitted to be below Cape Cornelius [the present Cape Henlopen]—and running Westward to the exact middle of the Peninsula; that from the exact middle of the Peninsula, between the two bays of Chesapeake and Delaware, and the end of the line intersecting it in the latitude of Cape Henlopen, a line should be run northward, so as to form a tangent with the periphery of the semicircle at New Castle, drawn with the radius of twelve English statute miles, whether such a line should take a due North course or not; that after the said Northwardly line should touch the New Castle semicircle, it should be run further Northward until it reached the same latitude as fifteen English statute miles due South of the most Southern part of the City of Philadelphia; that from the Northern point of such line, a due West line should be run, at least for the present, across the Susquehanna river, and 25 miles beyond it,—and to the Western limits of Pennsylvania, when occasion and the improvements of the country should require; that that part of the due West line not actually run, though imaginary, should be considered to be the true boundary of Maryland and Pennsylvania ;" . . . . and "that the route should be well marked by trees and other natural objects, and designated by stone pillars, sculptured with the arms of the contracting parties, facing their respective possessions."


This important document, though seemingly so free from ambiguity, was afterwards the subject of much litigation, but was finally carried into complete effect in all its parts. It accounts for the remarkable boundaries of the " three lower counties."


It appears by the notes of John Taylor, surveyor of Chester County, that in December, 1732, he measured a line of twelve miles in length from " John French's corner," in New Castle, N. 84̊ 15' W., to a post in Enoch Morgan's field. He then ran southward on an arc of the circle by chords of 331 perches, 1170- inches, varying the course half a degree at each succeeding station. From the end of the west line he ran N. 5̊ 45' E., thus : December 22d, 800 perches, to John Rankin's December 27th, 960 perches, to a run by Philip Douglass' ; December 28th, 800 perches, to Widow Corry's field ; 29th, 928 perches, to Nottingham road ; and 30th, 672 perches, to the Widow Pusey's (10 outs and 4 chains, wanting 5 links thereof come to John Allen's barn),—the whole being 13 miles. In March following the line was extended northward to Chambers' line, 61 miles farther. In April a west line from Philadelphia was run, and it was ascertained that from the parallel of New Castle to that of Philadelphia was 18 miles, 313 perches. In September, 1733, John Taylor went to New Castle to wait on the commissioners for dividing the provinces, but it does not appear that anything was done. In October, 1734, he received a warrant, by which he ran a line westward from Susquehanna to " Conegochege" between the 22d of October and the 6th of November. These operations do not appear to have been with the concurrence of the Maryland authorities, and therefore did not settle the vexed question.


The quiet of the provinces continuing to be interrupted by the conflicting claims of settlers along the border, both parties applied in 1737 to the king's Council for some order which should lessen or allay these ferments. An amicable temporary arrangement, however, was in the mean time effected by the parties, and they agreed " that all the vacant land not now possessed by or under either of them, on the east side of the Susquehanna River down


158 - HISTORY OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.


as far as fifteen miles and a quarter south of the latitude of the most southern part of the city of Philadelphia, and on the west side of Susquehanna as far south as fourteen miles and three-quarters south of the latitude of the most southern part of the city of Philadelphia, should be subject to the temporary and provisional jurisdiction of Pennsylvania ; and that all vacant land not possessed by or under either, on both sides of the Susquehanna south of the said temporary limits, should be subject to the jurisdiction of Maryland, until the boundaries were finally settled, but to be without prejudice to either party." And when this convention was reported to the Council, His Majesty was pleased to order that the proprietaries of the said respective provinces of Maryland and Pennsylvania do cause the said agreement to be carried into execution.


In December, 1738, it appears a line was run by certain " Jersey commissioners," and in April following Richard Peters and Lawrence Growdon, on the part of Pennsylvania, and Col. Levin Gale and Samuel Chamberlaine, on that of Maryland, with Benjamin Eastburn and William Rumsey as surveyors, proceeded to fix the line as far as the Susquehanna River. This was not accomplished without many disputes as to whether the measurements should be on the surface of the earth, without allowance for altitude of the bills ; whether the ordinary chain, which was a little longer than exact measure, should be used, etc.


In 1750 another attempt was made to settle some of the boundaries, at which time William Parsons was the chief surveyor on the side of Pennsylvania, and the commissioners Richard Peters, William Allen, Esq., Tench Francis, Thomas Hopkinson, Thomas Cookson, Ryves Holt, and Benjamin Chew. Among the items of expenses on this occasion were a hogshead of port wine, 11 gallons of spirits, and 42 gallons of rum, costing, in all, £27 12s. 6d. The Maryland commissioners again conjured up difficulties, and little was accomplished. On July 4, 1760, an agreement was entered into between Frederick Lord Baltimore and the Penns, by which the controversy was finally ended. Commissioners were appointed, who, with the aid of competent surveyors, traced the east-and-west peninsular line, —the twelve-mile circle in part,—and fixed the tangent-point in the periphery of the circle.


Their progress, however, was slow, and the proprietaries, becoming dissatisfied, dismissed them, and agreed with Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon, noted mathematicians and surveyors of London, to complete the work. They were to receive, besides maintenance, ten shillings sixpence each per day coming and returning, and one guinea per day while in America. Their arrival was on Nov. 15, 1763, and, having received instructions, in the following month set about the execution of their task.


They caused an observatory to be erected on Cedar (now South) Street, the most southern part of the city of Philadelphia, and ascertained its latitude to be 39̊ 56' 29". From thence, in January and February, 1764, they ran a line westward a distance of thirty-one miles, to a point on land now owned by Joel Harlin, in Newlin township, a short distance west of the Chester County almshouse, and there planted a stone, which was long known in the vicinage as the " star-gazers' stone." This line passed nearly a mile and a half south of the court-house in West Chester, and crossed the east branch of the Brandywine about Jefferis' Ford. The object in running the line thus far west was to avoid crossing the large streams flowing into the Delaware. From this point—the star-gazers' stone—they ran a due south line fifteen miles, to the latitude of what was to be the great west line, and there planted a post. In running the first mile of this south line they crossed the west branch of Brandywine three times ; had they extended their west line half a mile farther, they would have crossed it but once.


They examined the work of their predecessors, and adopted of it the running of the due west line from Cape Henlopen to its termination, midway between said cape and the shore of Chesapeake Bay, the trace and measurement of the radius of twelve miles from New Castle court-house, and the determination of the tangent-point in the circle. The lines traced by their predecessors in their attempts to run the tangent-line—a line of nearly eighty-two miles in length—were, however, of great use in finally establishing that line. They ran and established the tangent-line from the middle of the peninsula line to the tangent-point, and caused both it and the peninsula line from the ocean to the middle point to be marked. This occupied the summer of 1764.


They then went to the point where they had planted a post, at the end of the fifteen miles south from the most southern part of Philadelphia, and ran a parallel of latitude westward a short distance, so as to be as far west as the longitude of the tangent-point. They next proceeded to the tangent-point, where the tangent-line, already run, ended, on the periphery of the circle, and ran a due north line from this point until it intersected the said parallel of latitude; and at the point of intersection, in a ravine near a spring, they caused a stone to be planted, fixing the northeast corner of Maryland.


Having ascertained this point to be in latitude 39̊ 43' 32" (more accurate observations now make it 39̊ 43' 26.3"), they ran a line west to the Susquehanna, and verified the latitude there.


The due north line from the tangent-point cut the semicircle, throwing a little bow or arc to the west of the line, which, by the agreement of the parties, was to go to New Castle County. The portion of the semicircle thus cut off is about one and a half miles long at the base, and its middle width is one hundred and sixteen feet. The surveyors, after running the west line to the Susquehanna, returned to the tangent-point, and ran and marked this little bow or arc. This was the only part of the circular line which they ran, Lord Baltimore having no concern in the residue of it, and their business being simply to establish the line between Penn acrd Baltimore. Where the due north line from the tangent-point cut the circle is the point of junction of the three States of Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland,—an important point, which they caused to be well ascertained and marked. The distance from this point of intersection to the northeast corner of Maryland is a little over three and a half miles, and from this corner due east to the circle a little over three-fourths of a mile, the territory between these points constituting the little peak belonging to


BOUNDARY LINES - 159


Chester County, running down between the circular boundary of Delaware on the one side and the eastern boundary of Maryland on the other.


The surveyors next proceeded to the Susquehanna, to which they had already run the due west line from the northeast corner of Maryland, and resumed their labors in that line. This was in June, 1765. They continued the line westward that season to the Kittatinny Mountains, ninety-five miles from the Susquehanna, and then returned to the settlements to pass the winter. In the spring of 1766 they were again at their post, and in that and the following year continued the line until they reached a point two hundred and thirty miles from the northeastern corner of Maryland, and within thirty-six miles of the whole distance to be run in order to make five degrees of longitude from the Delaware. At this point they came to an Indian war-path winding its way through the forest.


The Indians through whose territory they had been passing had for some time been restless and dissatisfied. They thought this army of surveyors, with their assistants, chain-bearers, rod-men, axe-men, commissaries, cooks, baggage-carriers, servants, and laborers, meant something. " Their untutored minds could not comprehend this mighty gazing at the stars through gun-like instruments, and the daily felling of forests across their hunting-paths." The surveyors were forbidden by them to advance beyond the war-path, and, having no alternative but obedience, they retraced their steps and returned to Philadelphia. Subsequently, and by other hands, the line was continued to its termination at the southwest corner of Pennsylvania.


The agreement of the proprietaries provided that the lines thus run should be marked in a particular manner. This was done as the work progressed by placing at the corners, and at the end of every fifth mile along the lines, a stone, on which was graven the arms of the proprietaries on the sides facing their respective possessions, the intermediate miles being noted by stones having the letter M on one side and the letter P on the other. The greater part of these stones were brought from England. In running these lines a vista was cut through the forest twenty feet wide, by felling all the trees and large bushes in that space the entire distance. The stones to mark the lines were erected along the middle of this pathway. These stones thus brought from England were planted about as far west as Sideling Hill, a distance of one hundred and thirty-two miles from the northeast corner of Maryland. There being no adequate means of transporting them from this point, through the forests and over the mountains, their further use was abandoned, and the continuation of the line was marked with piles of stone, built some six to eight feet high, on the tops of the ridges and mountains, as far as the summit of the Alleghanies ; beyond this the line was marked with posts at the end of every mile, with stones built around them.


THE CIRCULAR LINE.


The first notice we find of an adjustment of the division line between the counties of Upland (afterwards Chester) and New Castle is in the records of the Upland Court. Under date of Nov. 12, 1678, the following entry occurs :


"The limits and divisions between this (Upland) and New Castle county, were this day agreed upon and settled by the Court, and Mr. John Moll, President of New Castle Court, to be as followeth : viz. ' This county of Upland to begin from ye north syde of Oele Francens creeke, otherways called Steenkill, lying in the voght above ye Verdrietege hoeck, and from the said creek ouer to ye Singletree point on ye east syde of this river.'"


This description is not very intelligible to a reader of the present day, but may be aided by a brief explanation. The creek called Oele Francen's, or Steen or Stony Creek, ran through a tract of 1000 acres, granted by the Duke of York in two patents of 1673 and 1676, respectively, to Ode Francen and company. It is not now known as Stony Creek, except by tradition, but bears the name of Quarry Creek, and crosses the Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad about three and three-quarter miles below the mouth of Naaman's Creek, in Brandywine Hundred, New Castle County. " Verdrietege hoeck," or corner of land, also called Trinity Hook, lay between Shellpot and Stony Creeks. It contained. about 800 acres, and was granted in two patents, in 1663 and 1664, to John Hendricks and others. It ran for about the distance of one and three-fifths miles along the Delaware, and terminated on the north of Stone Point. The creek which empties into the Delaware at Dupont's Landing ran through the tracts. The term " verdrietige," which has long ceased to be used, was derived from the Dutch " verdrietigh," signifying grievous or tedious, and it is supposed the name " Verdrietige Hook" was given on account of the character of the navigation in approaching that point. " Singletree Point" is now Old Man's Point, on the New Jersey shore, one mile below the mouth of Old Man's Creek.


This adjustment of the line between Upland and New Castle Counties, it will be observed, was made in 1678, several years before the grant of Pennsylvania to William Penn. Stony Creek (or Quarryville Creek, as it is now called), which was thus made the division line, remained such until the grant to Penn fixed the boundary of his province of Pennsylvania " on the south by a circle drawn, at the distance of twelve miles from New Castle, northward and westward."


At the court held at Upland, or Chester, on the 14th day of March, 1683, Naaman's Creek was recognized as the boundary line, and it is also laid down as such by Thomas Holme, surveyor-general under Penn, in his "map of the improved part of the province of Pennsylvania in America."


In 1693 some of the inhabitants of Chester County petitioned the Governor and Council, setting forth that they suffered for want of a division line between that county

and New Castle. After discussion in Council, it was, on the 9th of August, 1693,


"Resolved, That for the present convenience of the governments, and not for an absolute and final proprietarie division, but that the inhabitants on the borders of both counties may know to which of the two to pay their levies, taxes, etc., and perform their other countie services, the bounds of New Castle county shall extend northward to the mouth of Naaman's creek, and upwards along the southwest side of the northmost branch (excluding the townships of Concord and Bethel), and not to extend backwards of the said northmost branch, above the said two townships."


This was but an approximation to correctness, and the line was still unsettled. A disagreement had arisen be-


160 - HISTORY OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.


tween the province and the three lower counties, as they were generally termed ; a separation was threatened, and it was of importance to adjust the boundary. Accordingly, on the 20th of 7th month, 1701, the Assembly petitioned Penn " that the division line between the counties of New Castle and Chester be ascertained, allowing the boundary according to the proprietary's letters patent from the king," to which he replied, " It is my own inclination, and I desire the representatives of New Castle and Chester Counties forthwith, or before they leave town, to attend me about the time and manner of doing it." It will be remembered that Penn was also the proprietary of " the three lower counties" ( now constituting the State of Delaware), which he had purchased from the Duke of York, and those counties were represented in the Assembly at Philadelphia.


A conference was accordingly held, and a warrant, dated the 28th of the 8th month, 1701, was issued, directed to Isaac. Taylor, of Chester County, and Thomas Pierson, of New Castle County, authorizing them to accompany the magistrates of the counties of Chester and New Castle, or any three of them, and


"In their presence to admeasure and survey from the town of New Castle the distance of twelve miles in a right line up ye said river, and from ye said distance according to ye King's letters patent and deeds from the Duke, and ye said circular line to be well marked two-thirds part of ye semicircle."


The " letters patent" here referred to was the grant of Pennsylvania, and the " deeds from the duke" were the two deeds from the Duke of York, conveying the territory now constituting the State of Delaware, one of them for the town of. New Castle and twelve miles around it, and the other the territory south of it to Cape Henlopen.


The centre of the arc of the circle, or the point of beginning of the radial line, was established by the magistrates " at the end of the horse dyke next to the town of New Castle."


The following extracts from the report of the surveyors appointed by the foregoing warrant fully explains the work performed by them, and the mode they adopted of running the circular line :


"The 26th day of the ninth month we did begin, in the presence of the said Justices (Cornelius Empson, Richard Halliwell, John Richardson, Caleb Pusey, Philip Roman, and Robert Pyle, Esqs.), at the end of the horse dyke, and measured due north twelve miles to a white oak marked with twelve notches, standing on the west side of Brandywine creek in the land of Samuel Helm, and from the said white oak we ran eastward circularly, changing our course from the east southward one degree at the end of every sixty-seven perches, which is the chord of one degree to a twelve miles radius ; and at the end of forty-three chords we came to the Delaware river, on the upper side of Nathaniel Lampley's old house at Chichester; and then we returned to the said white oak on Israel Helm's land, and from thence we ran westward, changing our course one degree from the west southward at the end of every sixty-seven perches, as before, until we had extended seventy-seven chords, which, being added to the forty-three chords, make two-thirds part of the semicircle to a twelve mile radius, all which said circular line being well marked with three notches on each side of the trees to a marked hickory standing near the western branch of Christina creek. Surveyed the 4th day of the tenth month,

1701, by us,

" ISAAC TAYLOR,

"THOS. PIERSON."


This survey, which, it will be observed, took place in 1701, is the only one which was ever made of the circular boundary between Pennsylvania and Delaware, except for a short distance at the southwest end, which will be noticed presently. The marks which were then made to designate the line have long since been obliterated, and there is now nothing but vague and conflicting traditionary evidence of its location.


In the year 1849 the Legislature of Pennsylvania passed an act authorizing the Governor


"To appoint a Commissioner to act in conjunction with Commissioners appointed, or to be appointed by the States of Delaware and Maryland, with power to survey and determine the point of intersection of the three States of Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland, and to fix some suitable mark or monument whereby the said point may hereafter be indicated."


This act was passed in consequence of the general belief that the stone planted by Mason and Dixon to mark the point of intersection had been removed, and that some others of the stones planted in the vicinity had been displaced. Similar laws were passed by the States of Delaware and Maryland, and under them the following commissioners were appointed by the Governors of three States, viz. : on the part of Pennsylvania, Joshua P. Eyre ; of

Delaware, George Read Riddle ; and of Maryland, H. G. S. Key.


These commissioners procured the services of Col. J. D. Graham, of the United .States Corps of Topographical Engineers, who was detailed by the Secretary of War to make the requisite surveys, at the request of the commissioners.


The commissioners and engineers, in the performance of the duties assigned them, proceeded to the northeast corner of Maryland, the commencement of Mason and Dixon's east-and-west line. This point is in a deep ravine, on the margin of a small brook, and near 'its source. They found that the stone monument, with the respective arms of Lord Baltimore and the Penn family graven thereon, which had been placed there in 1768 to designate the point, was missing. From the tradition of the neighborhood, it appeared that some years before, after it had fallen nearly prostrate from its place, owing to the encroachments of the stream upon whose margin it stood, some individual had taken it away for a chimney-piece. A stake was found firmly planted in the ground, which, they were informed by the neighbors, occupied its place. Their subsequent surveys established that this stake occupied the true position, and they there planted a new stone of cut granite about seven feet long, five feet of which was imbedded in the ground. It was marked with the letter P on the north and east sides, and with the letter M on the south and west sides.


They ascertained the tangent-point and point of intersection of the due north line with the semicircle established by Mason and Dixon to be substantially correct, although some errors were discovered which did not materially affect the result. Some of the miles had been made a little too long. The radius of twelve miles was found to be two four inches too short, and by some error in locating the tangent.point and point of intersection, it was found that Maryland had got about one acre and three-quarters to which she was not strictly entitled, but which belonged to Delaware. These trifling errors, however, served to prove the general accuracy cf the work of Mason and Dixon.


BOUNDARY LINES - 161


The commissioners, in addition to the new monument at the northeast corner of Maryland, caused new stones to be planted at the tangent-point, the point of intersection, and also on the meridian of the circle, viz. : at the tangent-point, a post of cut granite six feet long, inserted four and a half feet of its length in 'the ground, with the word tangent and the date 1849 graven on the north side at the junction of the three States, a triangular prismatic post of cut granite seven feet long, inserted four and a half feet of its length in the ground, marked with the letters P D and M on the sides facing respectively towards Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland, and on the north side the names of the commissioners and date 1849 and at the meridian or middle point of the arc, corresponding to the length of the chord, and at the distance of one hundred and eighteen and four-tenths feet perpendicular from the middle point of said chord, a post of cut granite six feet long, inserted four and a half feet of its length in the ground. This stone was rounded on the west side to indicate that it was on the curve, and the date 1849 was cut on the east side. The curve here referred to is that circular line between the tangent-point and point of intersection of the three States which was cut off by the due north line from the tangent-point.


The marks made in surveying the circular boundary in 1701, as before observed, having become obliterated by time, the commissioners ran and marked it for a distance of three miles and three-quarters northeastward from the point of junction to a point about east from the northeast corner of Maryland.


The authority of the commissioners did not contemplate a survey of the entire line, and they proceeded no farther than the point indicated.


The territory constituting the little peak on the southern boundary of Chester Country, lying between the right line of Maryland on the one side and the curved line of Delaware on the other, is about three-quarters of a mile wide at the upper part, and three and a half miles long, tapering to a point at the intersection of the three States, and contains about 800 acres. It comprises within its limits the village of Mechanicsville, the Presbyterian church known as " Head of Christina," and several farms.


This territory undeniably belongs to Pennsylvania, and properly forms part of the township of London Britain, in Chester County. The State of Delaware, however, has always exercised jurisdiction over it, treating her boundary


- 21 -


as extending to the northeast corner of Maryland. The land is taxed in Delaware, the inhabitants vote as citizens of that State, and offenses committed therein are punished by her courts, while, on the other hand, Pennsylvania has never exercised any authority over it.


The question may be asked how it comes that this territory, thus without doubt a part of Pennsylvania, should be under the control of Delaware ?


Without having seen any explanation of it, our conclusion is that it probably arose in this way : the circular line was run in the year 1701, extending from the Delaware River to the Christina Creek, a distance of about twenty-five miles. The survey of Mason and Dixon, establishing the eastern boundary of Maryland, was not made until the year 1764. The marks designating the circular line had in the mean time become in a measure obliterated, and no part of this line was run by Mason and Dixon. When .the east line of Maryland was established, the impression was created that the boundary of " the three lower counties," now constituting the State of Delaware, extended to the same line, up to the northeast corner of Maryland, and no survey was made or stones planted to indicate that a small peak of land belonging to Pennsylvania ran down between Maryland and New Castle County. The corner of Maryland was therefore assumed to be also the corner of New Castle County, and jurisdiction has always been exercised in accordance with this impression. In addition to this, the survey of the circular line in 1701 was probably not very accurately made, and, for aught that is now known, the line as then marked may at the western end have approached nearer to the line of Maryland than the true line, as indicated by the partial survey of it made in 1849, and thus have included in New Castle County at least a portion of the territory now known to belong to Chester County. Besides this, the point of ending of the survey of 1701, at the Christina Creek, shows that the line was not run as far south as the point of intersection, afterwards ascertained by Mason and Dixon. It was not, therefore, until 1849 that the end of the circular line south of the Christina Creek was run at all. The commissioners, in running the line the distance of three and three-quarter miles from the point of junction, found the impression general that the boundary of Delaware extended up to the north line from the junction to the northeast corner of Maryland.


It is hoped that the whole line may at no distant day be authoritatively surveyed and marked.


TOWNSHIPS AND BOROUGHS, ETC.


ASTON.


ORGANIZED about 1687. The taxables for 1715 were as follows:


Robert Carter, John Pennell, Moses Key, John Dutton, Thomas Dutton, Thomas Woodward, John Neeld, James Widdows, William Rattew, Samuel Jones, Thomas Barnard, Abraham Darlington, John Hurford, Jonathan Monroe, Thomas Gale.


Freemen.—Thomas Dunbabin, Isaac Williams, Joseph Darlington, Edward Richards, Samuel Stroud.


This township is now a part of Delaware County.


BETHEL.


This name occurs as early as 1683. In 1715 the taxables were :


Robert Pyle, John Grist, Robert Booth, Edward Beazer, John Cannady, Benjamin Moulder, Joseph Pyle, John Hickman, Edward Dutton, Edward Pennock, William Griffith, John Hopton, John Gibbons, Thomas Durnell.


This township is now in Delaware County.


BENSALEM.


In 1704 a number of surveys in and near the forks of Brandywine were said to be in Bensalem, and in 1708 a tract of land west of the present Unionville was described by deed as in that township. The territory included therein was afterwards absorbed by the townships of Bradford and East Marlborough.


BIRMINGHAM.


This township was probably named by William Brinton, one of the earliest settlers, who came from the neighborhood of the town of that name in England, and, as was common with the early settlers, selected for his wilderness home the name that would recall to his memory the early associations of his life. It was surveyed about the year 1684 to various persons, in right of purchases made in England, and was organized as a municipal district in 1686, by the appointment of John Bennett as constable.


Upon the division of the county in 1789, the greater part of the original township fell into Delaware County. Each division thereafter bore the name of Birmingham township in its respective county. Until the year 1856 the Street road was the northern boundary of the township in Chester County. In that year (1856) it was enlarged by the addition to it of a portion of the southern end of East Bradford township.


The battle of Brandywine was fought in this township. The site of the field of operations at Chads' Ford is in Delaware County, and that at Birmingham Meeting-house in Chester County.

The name of the township was originally pronounced Brummagem, and it is so given on Holme's map of the early settlements of Pennsylvania. This pronunciation was brought by the early settlers from England, and is generally supposed to be a corruption of Birmingham. That, however, is a mistake. The name Brummagem is derived from Brumwycheham, the ancient name of Birmingham, and was used in common with Birmingham, which signifies the home of the descendants of Beorm, a Saxon chief. Birmingham, in England, was formerly the great emporium, for plated ware and imitation jewelry, and hence the word Brummagem came to signify anything trashy or common. The Saturday Review, an English magazine, speaks of

" Diluted history and Brummagem lore."


The following were the taxables in 1715 :





William Brinton

John Beckingham

Robert Pyle, Junr

Robert Chalfan

John Chalfan, Junr

Jonathan Compton

Magnus Simonson

John Chalfan, Senr

Thomas Codery

Providence Scott

Sawn Hollingsworth

Joseph Gilpin

Gyan Stevenson

Samuel Painter, Senr

Samuel Painter, Junr

William Turner

John Bennett

£ s. d.

0 8 0

0 1 8

0 3 10

0 2 6

0 2 4

0 1 0

0 2 6

0 0 10

0 2 6

0 1 3

0 3 6

0 8 4

0 8 4

0 0 8

0 2 3

0 1 3

0 7 6


Richard Webb

John Weith

Edmund Butcher

Daniel Davies

John ffred

Thomas Chandler

Swithin Chandler

Joseph Robinson

Sarah Green

Henry Gunston

Sam Scott, Junr


free Men.


John Harvey

John House


Total

£ s. d.

0 6 4

0 3 7

0 2 3

0 4 2

0 8 0

0 1 8

0 1 8

0 1 6

0 2 6

0 2 4

0 1 0




0 4 0

0 4 0


5 1 3




The taxables of 1753 were as follows :


Edward Brinton, Esqr, John Chads, Wm Jones, Geo : Gilpin, JO Dilworth, Thomas Chandler, Isaac Harvey, Charles Turner, Wm Seal, Abram Darlington, John Jackson, John Bennit, Benja Way, Caleb Brinton, Amos Harvey, John Wilson, Daniel Guest, Samuel Painter, Robert Chamberlin, Jonathan Thatcher, Benjamin Ring, June, Jane Noset, Ralph Pyle, John Painter, William Smith, Thomas Gibson, John Chandler, Eliza Cathcart, Robert Hannum, Robert Chalfont, Robert Green, Benja. Ring, Isaac Smith, Robert Chalfont, Junr., James Brooks, Obadiah Bonsai!, Matthew Guy, Francis Simonson, John Shaw, William McMath, Andrew McCoy, John Chamberlin, Robert Mcfarson, Isaac Bullock, John Woodward, Neal Woodward.

Inmates.—Joseph Dutton, Providence Scott, John Gibson, Edward Patridge, John Martin, John Newberry, William Baxter, Nathan Frame, Elias Neal, Peter Glancey, John Thatcher, Allen Cerson, Philip Philips, George Moor, Samuel Batten, Wm Richardson, James Durnal.


Freemen.—John Plumer, Wm Warrick, Wm McMurry, Samuel Jennins, John Maxfield, John Henderson, John Bryan, Stephen Maddon, William White.


LAND-OWNERS, 1774.


Edward Brinton, Caleb Brinton, George Brinton, David Brinton, John Bennett, Obadiah Bonsell, Thomas Bullock, Win. Boid, Thomas Chandler, James Chandler, Robert Chandler, Abraham Darlington, Jr., Joseph Davis, Sr., Joseph Davis, Jr., Lydia Dilworth, Charles Dilworth, Joseph Dilworth, Robert Frame, Harry Gordon, Gideon Gilpin, Robert Green, Jane Gibbons, John Gordon, William Harvey, Amos House, Thomas Hannum, John Henderson, William Jones, Ben-

jamin Miller, Robert McElhoe, William Mason, Robert Messer, John Nicklin, Samuel Painter, James Russell, Robert Rankin, Benjamin






TOWNSHIPS AND BOROUGHS, ETC. - 163


Ring, Nathaniel Ring, James Smith, William Smith, Edward Simpson, Rachel Sail, James Stroud, John Thatcher, John Woodart, Rachel Warson, Nathan Yarnall, Elias Neals, Thomas Stroud, Thomas Jones, John Perry, James Dilworth, David Johnson, David May, Thomas McDaniel, Benjamin McDaniel, James Latimore, John McGlochlin, Robert Logan, James Newman, and Fras. Herberson.


Lying immediately north of the Street road, and extending from Brandywine to the line of Westtown, was a tract of 1000 acres, laid out for William Cornthwet and Edward Atkinson, purchasers of 500 acres each from Penn, and who sold the same to John Cornwell and William Hudson, of Philadelphia. By a resurvey in 1701 there proved to be 1132 acres. John Davis, of Thornbury, purchased the eastern half of it in 1712, and by will dated March 3, 1719, divided it between three of his sons, Daniel, Abraham, and John, the first receiving 166 acres next the Street road, and the others 200 each. Of the remainder of the large tract, Samuel Painter purchased, in 1722, about 300 acres, much of which is still in the family name. John Collier obtained, about the same time, 245 acres north of Painter's, and Joseph Taylor, of Kennet, with an eye to a mill-seat, bought from Collier 26 acres at what is now Sager's mill. He devised it to his daughter, Sarah Jones, in 1744, and her husband and sons erected thereon grist- and saw-mills. Some of the Collier lands passed into the Carter family, and thence to the Forsythes.


Abraham Davis, who owned 200 acres next the Westtown line, was succeeded by his eldest son, John, who in turn left one son, Amos. The latter, with Eleanor, his wife, conveyed the land to Joshua Sharpless, 4, 19, 1784. It was next divided between Joshua's sons, Benjamin and Isaac, the latter obtaining the farm late of his son Aaron, whose family still reside thereon. Benjamin left an only son, of the same name, who now holds his father's land, 120 acres, by bequest. His father built the barn in 1804, and the house in 1805, but the present owner, who began farming in 1856, has remodeled all the buildings, and made many improvements in accordance with this progressive age. A view of his residence is elsewhere given.


Susanna Davis, a widow, lived alone in a log house on the site of the residence of the late Aaron Sharpless, and was murdered on the night of Jan. 3d, 1782. Joseph Dennis, of Vincent, offered a reward of ten pounds specie for the arrest of George Holt, an Englishman, who was accused of robbery and the murder, but it does not appear that he was caught.


In 1688 a survey was made for Daniel Smith on 360 acres in Birmingham, which by resurvey proved to be 415 acres. It was sold by Sheriff Hoskins, April 25, 1702, to Richard Webb, to whom a patent was granted the same year. His widow, Elizabeth Webb, by deed of 10, 27, 1721, conveyed one acre thereof to William Brinton, of Birmingham, Joseph Taylor, of Kennet, Philip Taylor and Joseph Brinton, of Thornbury, John Bennett and Nicholas Fred, of Birmingham, trustees, for the use of the Society of Friends, and Birmingham meeting-house was built thereon.


BRADFORD.


Organized about 1705, Richard Buffington being constable for that year. He was succeeded by Robert Jefferis in 1706, and Abiah Taylor in 1707.


In this, as in some other townships, the first settlers were not the first owners of the land, and the first surveys were made for persons who had purchased before leaving England, if indeed they ever came over. Prior to 1686 the surveyor's chain had probably not been stretched within its limits, and an unbroken wilderness existed where now may be seen some of the finest farms in the county ; even for several years after that date little was done towards reclaiming the forests and making the soil. produce food for civilized man. The Welsh tract had been laid out, and its western line afforded a base for further operations, as did also the surveys to the southward, in Birmingham.


About the year 1686 surveys were made of nearly all the land south of the Strasburg road, but some of these were afterwards altered. It must be remembered that the Street road formed the southern limits of the township until within a few years. Commencing at this line, a tract of 1000 acres was laid out for Thomas Langhorn and company, extending from the Westtown line to Brandywine. Next, on the north, came Robert Whitton, 192 acres, and John Gardner, 244, both of whom sold to John Loftus, of Philadelphia. Adjoining the Goshen or Welsh line, a tract of 1500 acres was patented to Arthur Cook, of Philadelphia County. This extended from the Westtown line nearly as far as the north line of the borough of West Chester, the northwest corner being a few rods west of the old Black Horse tavern, and the southwest corner near Strode's mill. To the west of this, and north of Gardner's tract, three others were laid out parallel to the Welsh line, and with their northern end just crossing the east branch of the creek. That on the east side was for Samuel Noyes, of Wiltshire, about 250 acres ; 'the middle tract, 250 acres, for Thomas Martin, of Bedwin Magna, in Wiltshire, who came over in 1685 and settled in Middletown (now Delaware County). The third tract, 140 acres, was for John Martin, of Edgcott, in Berkshire, who also settled in Middletown. Another tract of 1000 acres for Langhorn and company included the greater part of the township lying west of the east branch of Brandywine. The company consisted of John Cornwell, 'William Hudson, Thomas Lang-horn, and Arthur Borradail, of whom the two latter settled in Bucks County, and the others in Philadelphia. The remainder of the land in the township was mostly surveyed in after-years as it was wanted for settlement, and some of that in the northern part, not being naturally of so good a quality, was left unimproved for a long time.


Among the land-owners who became actual settlers Richard Buffington was probably the first. He was the ancestor of the numerous family of the name, and had settled at Upland (now Chester) before William Penn obtained a grant for Pennsylvania. In 1696 he purchased, in conjunction with William Vestal, 218 acres from the executors of John Loftus, and in 1701 they obtained the remainder of the Loftus tract, or 218 acres more, in two pieces ; and it appears they made a division by Vestal taking the last purchase. This land extended from the Brandywine, below the forks, nearly to Strode's mill. In 1708, Richard Buffington, purchased from Thomas Martin, of Middletown, 210 acres, extending northward from his


164 - HISTORY OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.


first purchase to the east branch of the creek ; and having sold 100 acres to Nathaniel Ring, he divided the remainder between his sons, Thomas and William, in 1721, reserving a life interest therein. In this division he gave each of his sons about equal frontage on both the main stream and branch, thus making two long, narrow, and irregular tracts. Between the large tract of Arthur Cook and that of Langhorn and company there was left a vacant piece, through which ran the Brandywine from the Strasburg road to Jefferis' Ford, and in 1702, Thomas Buffington obtained a warrant for 100 acres of this, " next his tract, whereon he is now seated, on Brandywine." In 1708 he purchased 54 acres adjoining of the Thomas Martin tract, and this, with that part of the 100 acres west of the creek, formed the greater part of the farm late of David Meconkey. Joseph Buffington was the first resident owner of 200 acres, in the forks of the creek, which he purchased in 1748, just after his father's death.


A tract of 125 acres on the cast side of the creek, at the forks, now mostly included in the farm of George Little, was surveyed for Benjamin Mendenhall, of Concord, who made a partial conveyance thereof in 1699 to William Vestal. The latter settled thereon and built a house, but died soon after. His wife's name was Alice, and his children William, George, and a daughter, Sarah, who was drowned in a small pond of water in childhood, when they lived in Birmingham, 1696. The family continued to hold land in the township until 1729, after which they went South.


Robert Jefferis, of Chichester, disposed of his land in that township in 1700, and the next year purchased from William Vestal 169 acres on Brandywine, the south line of which now forms a portion of the line between East Bradford and Birmingham. It is likely that he settled on the land in the same year, but at that time the township lines were not very well defined, nor had Bradford even received the name, and we find that in 1703 Robert Jefferis was appointed constable for Westtown, his next neighbor on the north, Richard Buffington, having held the office for three years previous. Tradition points to the residence of Charles Carter, on the road from Sager's mill to West Chester, as the site of Robert's dwelling. In 1712 he purchased the Noyes' tract of 256 acres, which now forms the principal part of the farms of John James, Paschall Hacker, and the late William Parker Foulke. In 1721 he purchased from William Buffington 189 acres, which connected the two former purchases. The Noyes' tract he conveyed to his sons, James and Robert, the Buffington tract to James and William, and the homestead to his son Benjamin ; so that he does not appear to have owned any land at the time of his death, which occurred about 1738.


Abiah Taylor settled on the Brandywine in 1702, and built a mill on a branch of this stream which flowed by his dwelling, the site of which is still used for the same purpose. In 1724 he built a brick house on a mound by the run which empties into the Brandywine a little south of the Strasburg road. It has been frequently said that the bricks were brought from England, but this is not correct. They were made on the farm, from clay procured a short distance south of the house. The window sash were made of lead, and the lights were small. It is still standing, and is known throughout the neighborhood as " the old brick house." It can be readily seen from the Strasburg road as


HOUSE BUILT BY ABIAH TAYLOR IN 1724.


the traveler passes between the old Black Horse tavern and Cope's bridge over the Brandywine. It is on the creek road leading south from the Strasburg road. In its day it must have been considered one of the finest houses in the county. In 1706 he took up 200 acres on what has been called Taylor's Run, and this he gave to his daughter, Deborah Parke, and her children. Another tract of equal size he took up in 1715, and this passed to the family of his daughter, Alice Hoopes. This now forms the farms of Watson J. Ambler, Simeon Hoopes, and Benjamin Few. John Cope purchased, and in 1712 settled on, 200 acres of land on Taylor's Run, and next to the Goshen line. The valley through which this stream flows was named the " Vale of Avoca" by the late Dr. William Darlington. On the east side of the Brandywine, north of the Strasburg road, 500 acres were located in right of ten servants. A large part of it was purchased in 1761 by Abiah Taylor, grandson of the settler, and who built thereon in 1768 the substantial stone house now the residence of Robert L. Hayes.


Edward Wanton, of Scituate, Mass., by deed of 5th month 9, 1700, became the owner of 800 acres, it being the northern part of the Cook tract. This was sold by his sons, Joseph, William, and John, Sept. 7, 1727, to Joseph Townsend, who became the first resident owner. In 1731, Henry Woodward married Mary Townsend, and to him her father had conveyed 200 acres at the northwest corner in 1730. Woodward built a stone house thereon in 1731, now the northern part of the residence of George B. Mellor, of which a view is elsewhere given. The land subsequently passed into the possession of Abel Boake and Joseph Peirce, who sold to Joseph Cope, whose son, of the same name, sold the western part of it to John Hannum, and he was succeeded by George B. Mellor. After the death of Joseph Cope on the remaining portion, in 1870, it also was purchased by John Hannum, who died thereon in 1871. The buildings were erected by Joseph Cope in 1849 and 1850, and a view of them is elsewhere given.


Another portion of the Townsend tract, after remaining for two or three generations in the family, became, with some additions on the north, the property of Cheyney Jef-






TOWNSHIPS AND BOROUGHS, ETC. - 165


feris in 1794. After his death it was purchased, in 1837, by John James, his son-in-law, and became the residence, and later the property, of his son, Edward James, to whom it still belongs. The buildings have been renewed by the present owner, who now lives adjoining West Chester.

A view of the homestead will be found elsewhere.


Nathaniel Ring, in 1710, bought 386 acres of the Cook tract, now forming the greater part of the farms of Edwin James, Torbert Ingram, Richard Strode, and the late Emmor Davis and Philip Paxson. Richard Woodward bought another part of the Cook tract east of Nathaniel Ring, and settled thereon.


Between the two branches of Brandywine a large tract, called 1000 acres, was laid out for Thomas Langhorne and Arthur Borrodail. The western half was subsequently patented to Thomas Buffington in 1709, and the eastern half to John Borrodail, son of Arthur, in 1702. The latter sold to Thomas Worth, of Darby, who devised the land to three daughters of his son John, deceased, and they conveyed 150 acres at the south end to James Jefferis, who lived at the place now owned by Edward Holley. The remaining 350 acres they sold to their uncle, Thomas Worth, in 1738, and he settled upon it the next year, being the first resident owner. A large part of the Buffington tract above mentioned passed into the Carter family, and was held by them for many years, but it is now owned by the Worth family.


Another 1000-acre tract, lying immediately north of the last, was surveyed for Daniel Smith, of Marlborough, England, and sold by Thomas Chalkley, agent for John Smith, a grandson, to Richard Woodward, of Thornbury, in 1724. This Richard was designated as of the " Forks," to distinguish him from the Richard on the east side of the creek. The first assessment to be found is that of 1715, viz. :


BRADFORD RATE.





Richard Woodward

George Stroud

Richd Buffington

William Vestall

John Buffington

William Buffington

Obidiah (Abiah) Taylor

William Baldwin

Abel Whitaker

Richd Buffington.

Peter Colins

William Marshall

John Cope

Thomas Buffington

Edward Clayton

Thomas Arnold.

George Carter 

£ s. d.

0 2 8

0 7 8

0 5 0

0 2 0

0 2 0

0 3 4

0 8 4

0 1 3

0 3 0

0 4 6

0 2 6

0 5 0

0 1 8

0 3 4

0 2 6

0 2 6

0 1 6


Robert Jeferes

Abram Marshall


ffree Men


John Stroud

Richard Moore

John Buttler

William Clark


Non-resident Land


Daniel Smith

William Wonton

John Corwell

Jacob Taylor


Total

£ s. d.

0 5 3

0 6 4




0 4 0

0 4 0

0 4 0

0 4 0




0 8 4

0 6 8

0 4 2

0 1 8


5 7 2



At a court held Nov. 30, 1731, a petition was presented, signed by George Strode, Joseph Townsend, James Jefferis, Abiah Taylor, Samuel Scott, Richard Buffington, Henry Woodward, James Tull, Isaac Vernon, Abraham Marshall, and fourteen others, asking for the division of the township and the defining of the boundaries according to a draught thereto annexed, whereupon,


"It's Ordered that the sd Township of Bradford shall be divided into two Townships and the Eastern part thereof called East Bradford, shall be bounded as followeth, viz.: Beginning at the southwest corner of the land late of Richard Collett [Westtown], thence running by the same to the Welsh line, and by the said line to the northwest corner of a tract of land surveyed for John Smith, and from thence by a west line to the north branch of Brandywine creek, then down the same to the land late of Daniel Smith and Isaac Taylor ; thence along a line between the lands late of the said Daniel and Isaac to the northeast corner of Thomas Worth's land; thence akin a line between the land of the said Daniel Smith, Thomas Worth, and the land late of George Carter, to the northwest corner of the said Carter's land ; thence down the line between the land of the said George Carter, Thomas Buffington and William Rees, and the land of Abraham Marshall and William Marshall, to a corner of Isaac Norris' land ; then along a line between the land of the said Isaac Norris and William Marshall to the west branch of Brandywine creek; thence down the same to the fork of the said creek ; then down the main creek to the southwest corner of Samuel Painter's land; then along a line between the land of the said Painter and the land of Daniel Davis and James Townsend to the beginning.


"And it is also ordered that the Western division of the sd Township of Bradford shall be bounded as is hereinafter mentioned, viz.: Begining at the southeast corner of the Society Tract, thence by the line of the same to the northern corner of the sd Tract, then by a Line to the south west corner of John Packer's Land and by the sd Packer's Land to the South East corner thereof and from thence East to the north Branch of Brandywine Creek and then by the Eastern division of the 5d Township of Bradford to the Township of Kennett and by the sd Kennett Township and the Line of the sd Society Tract to the place of Begining."


Feb. 26, 1739-40, a petition was presented from a number of persons living on " a strip of land lying between the townships of Caln, Bradford, Goshen, and Whiteland," complaining that they suffered for want of the opening and repair of roads in their vicinity, which the neighboring supervisors refused to attend to. These persons were Thomas Prise, George Jefferis, Jacob Roile, John Bradley, John Lard, George Reger, John Beale, Robert Cole, Isaac Few, Richard Woodward, Joseph Bourgoin, Charles Wollerton, Boltis Miller, and Gusten Gorman.


Jacob Vernon presented a petition of the same import respecting a piece of road between East Caln and West Bradford, and asking that the vacant land may be added to adjacent townships, or made into a township of itself. Twenty-four citizens of West Bradford remonstrated against any addition to their township, Feb. 24, 1740-1, claiming that it was definitely bounded before Cain or Fallowfield, but suggesting that the vacant land was sufficient to form another township. It was, however, subsequently ordered by the court


"That all the vacant land lying to the east of the north branch of the Brandywine Creek, and between the townships of Caln, Goshen, and Whiteland, shall be added to the township of East Bradford, and that the vacancy between Caln and West Bradford, including Edward Brinton's land, be added to West Bradford township."


Among the needs of the early inhabitants were bridges to cross the larger streams, especially at a time of high water caused by rains. Thus we read in the records of Bradford Meeting that in 1748 John Cope, who was expected to declare his intentions of marriage with Elizabeth Fisher before the meeting, did not appear, " which is thought to be occasioned by the great floods."


The following document has been met with :


"Whereas the Neighborhood as well as Travellers & Market people from some Distance, are under great Difficulty & sometimes danger for want of a Bridge upon the East Branch of Brandywine Creek, on the road Leading from Doerun by Joseph Martin's Tavern to Philadelphia, at the Ford Called Taylor's ford in East Bradford, Chester county,


" Therefore, this is proposed as an Essay with Respect to it, to see what Encouragement can be had by way of Subscription where all persons who are Desirous or willing to promote ye Building a Bridge


166 - HISTORY OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.


at ye s'd place may subscribe according to their Good pleasure herein. It is Intended to have it made sufficiently strong and Planked over for men & horses to pass, &c., and Abiah Taylor & Nathan Coope are appointed to undertake ye work & have ye oversight of the same, and get ye Logs and other Timber Necessary prepared against Next Summer to have it Raised, and all persons that subscribes anything toward s'd Bridge, such of them that Chuse to pay their subscriptions in work at it, shall be allowed to work out the same at such work as they are capable of, they attending upon ye work when Requiset."


The subscribers' names to this paper were William Reed, William Woodward, Jr., Francis Townsend, Thomas Jefferis, Benjamin Townsend, Ebenezer Worth, Stephen Harlan, William Johnson, John Buffington, William Stringfellow, James Woodward, James Bane, Joshua Webb, Thomas Hoopes, David Hoopes, Nathan Hoopes, Thomas Hoopes, Jr., Thomas Worth, James Kenney, Abiah Taylor, Samuel Coope, Joseph Parke, Joshua Hoopes, Nathan Coope, Evan Jones, John Townsend, Joseph Coope, Abraham Taylor, Jonathan Parke, Deborah Parke, Alexander Foreman, Charles Ryan, John Hoopes, George Simcock, Joseph Hawley, Abram Pyle, Thomas Stephens, Robert Nilson, Joseph Martin, Joseph Thornbury, William Cullipher, Thomas Johnson, James Masters, Nathan Jefferis, Abiah Parke, John Lawrence, Joseph Woodward, and John Coope.


Francis Townsend, having a saw-mill, subscribed one hundred feet of plank, while all the rest gave money. All who are familliar with the locality will recognize the crossing as that occupied by the stone bridge at Edge T. Cope's. The above paper was not dated, but is supposed to have been written in 1767. Another paper, in the writing of Nathan Cope, gives an account of " work done at the Bridge," thus :


                                                                  £ s. d.

" To 3 Day's Drawing Logs a 15s. P Day -2 5 0

To 14i Days Carting a 10s. 11 Day - 7 5 0

To 6 Days Work a 3d. 19, Day - 0 18 0

To Dieting workmen at 4d. P Meal - 2 6 2

Total 12 14 2"


Another paper, without date, gives the proposed dimensions of a bridge, doubtless the same, showing that there were to be two abutments, twenty-three feet wide at top, with four piers, making five spaces, to be covered with fifteen sleepers on each span, and white-oak plank three inches thick, etc.


The present structure was built in 1807. A portion of the guard-wall containing the date-stone subsequently fell into the creek, and the stone being somewhat damaged, a new one was put in its place. One of the Parke family carried it home, and it lay for a long time at the foot of the door-steps. Anthony Taylor, who purchased the Parke farm and built an addition to the house, placed the stone in the gable-wall, where it now may be seen.


On the west side of the Brandywine, a short distance below Cope's bridge, a large mass of rocks rises almost perpendicularly from the edge of the stream to the height of sixty or seventy feet, which have long been known as " Deborah's rocks." There is a legend connected with these rocks, the substance of which is that in the early days of the province, while the aborigines still largely possessed the land, an Indian maiden, in despair because her pale-faced lover, to whom she was devotedly attached, had deserted her, threw herself from the cliff into the stream and was drowned. Some years since this legend was taken up by one of our citizens and woven into a tale of deep and thrilling interest. It passed the rounds of the newspapers, and became fixed in the popular mind as a veritable narra- tive of actual occurrences. It is scarcely necessary to say to the intelligent reader that the story is without foundation, so far as is known to history. The name was given in honor of Deborah Taylor, whose husband, Samuel Taylor, in early times had owned the lands on which they are situated, and had devised to her a life estate therein ; and instead of these rocks receiving their name from the heroic sacrifice of a fair Indian maiden, it was really conferred upon them from the circumstance of their being included in Deborah Taylor's life estate.


Bradford was probably named from Bradford, in Yorkshire, or the town of the same name on the Avon, in Wiltshire, England.


East Bradford was reduced in size in 1856 by the cutting off of a portion of its southern end and attaching it to Birmingham, as mentioned in the notice of the latter township, and a portion of West Bradford was taken in the formation of the township of Pocopson in 1849. The line between East Bradford and West Bradford was changed somewhat in 1857, so as to make the Brandywine the line at or near Sugar's bridge, adding land of John Pollock to East Bradford.


EAST BRADFORD TAXABLES, 1753.


Thos Worth, Esqr, Eliza. Jefferies, George Carter, Evan Jones, Joseph Buffington, James Smith, Wm Bennit, Samuel Grubb, Francis Linfield, Robert Jefferies, Wm Jefferies, John Jones, John Carter, Samuel Painter, Daniel Davis, John Davis, Junr, Abram Davis, John Davis, Senr, John Davis, son of John, John Darlington, Thos Darlington, George Entrikin, George Stroud, Theophilus Canby, Wm Stroud, Jab Jefferies, Richd Woodward, Saml Taylor, Henry Woodward, Abel Boaks, Jacob Sharpless, John Townsend, Joseph Townsend, Sam' Cope, John Cope, Thos Jefferies, Wm Quaintance, Joseph Wray, John Newlin, Anthony Dougherty, Charles Woolerton, Joseph Burgoine, John Gray, Thus Price, Jacob Riley, Benj. Hawley,. George Regoe, George Jefferies, Isaac Few, Isaac Lowe, Richd Clark, Wm Atherton, Nathan Hoopes, Edward Seeds, Jos Pierce, John Broomer.


Inmates.—Thomas Jefferies, John McCarty, John Stroud, John Wyor, Wm Stringfellow, Sam' Beaton, Thos Bailey, Robert Johnson, Richard Archer, John Fox.


Freemen.—George Archer, Thos Hayes, Robert Porter, David Fling, Sam' Entrikin, Dan' Harry, George Miles, Bryan Miles, John Doyle, Henry Croff, Thos Lasley, James Cammel, John Ward, Solomon Hopkins, Nathl Jefferies.


LAND-OWNERS, 1774.


Abiah Taylor, Abrm. Taylor, Abel Boake, Amos Davis, Abigail Fling, Benj. Hawley, Chas. Ryan, Daniel Davis, Deborah Taylor, Emmor Jefferis, Enoch Gray, Geo. Cart' r, Geo. Dunavan, Geo. Entriken, Henry Woodward, Hannah Carter, Joseph Rhoades, Jas. Jefferis, Jos. Cope, John Taylor, Jos. Buffington, Jos. Parke, John Ha nnum, Jos. Temple, John Jones, James Wolerton, Joseph Wolerton, Joshua Hoops, Jas. Starr, John Townsend, Isaac Chapman, John Darlington, Joseph Underwood, Jas. Painter, Joseph Downing, Jacob Talbot, Mary Grubb, Jas. Robinson, John Underwood, Nathan Cope, Nathan Hoops, Nathl. Jefferis, Richd. Jones, Richd. Strode, Richd. Jefferis, Saml. Painter, Saml. Cope, Susanah Davis, Sand. Entriken, Thos. Speakman, Thos. Worth, Thos. Hall, Thos. Carter, Wm. Messer, Saml. Osborn, Joseph Hawley, and George Strode.


WEST BRADFORD TAXABLES, 1753.


George Ligget, Thomas Ligget, William Clark, William Milliken, Robert Cole, John Buffinton, Richard Woodward, Richard Buffinton, Elixander Mullen, Robert Wilson, Susannah Thornbry, Joseph Martin, Joseph Few, John Mathews, George Martin, John Woodward, James Millison, Henry Hastings, John Young, Thomas Sheward, Joseph Taylor, Edward Cleaton, John Cleaton, Joshua Cleaton,






TOWNSHIPS AND BOROUGHS, ETC. - 167


Isaac Marshall, Thos. Edmons, James Carny, Robert Thornton, Samuel Thornton, Humphry Marshall, Rachel Marshall, Samuel Sellers, Hannah Marshall, John Battin, Isaac Vernon, James Tremble, William Woodward, Thomas Arnold, Thomas Buffington, Samuel Worth, Thomas Thornbury, James Hill, William Buffington, Stephen Harlan, James Marshall, John Buffington, Nath'l Buffington.


Inmates.—William Kirgan, Andrew Michael, Randal McAllister, John Wilson, James Ramsey, Joseph Armstrong, John Shaw, William Clayton, James Weldon, William Baldwin, Morgan Edwards.


Freemen.—James Shearard, George Martin, John Martin, James Buffington, James Cambell, Hugh Johnson, John Whippo, Henry Hastings, George Powell, Michael Ogollion, David Fling, Thomas McManus.


LAND-OWNERS, 1774.


Sarah Arnold, Ralph Ackison, Richd. Baker, John Batton, John Buffington, Jas. Brown, Joel Bally, Robt. Buffington, Wm. Buffington, James Bane, John Bane, John Batton, Jr., Jas. Bruce, Jona, Buffington, Richd. Buffington, John Chalfant, Joshua Clayton, Wm. Clayton, John Clark, Wm. Cooper, Jas. Chalfant, John Clayton, Geo. Currey, John Dowdle, Robt. Eastburn, Valentine Emerick, Wm. England, Thos. Ellis, Latham Engram, Abrm. Ford, Jas. Galbraith, Thos. Green, Joseph Green, Geo. Grosse, Joseph Hawley, Stephen Harlan, John Jordan, Geo. Jacobs, Danl. Leonard, Walter Lilley, Mary Lewis, Geo. Martin, Humphry Marshal, James Marshal, Martin Miller, Isaac Marshall, Jas. McElhaney, Joseph Martin, John Marshal, Jas. Milleson, Samuel Marshal, Abraham Pile, James Ramsey, Saml. Sellers, Jr., Sawl. Sellers, Thos. Shuart, Jas. Trimble, Richd. Townsend, Jos. Thornbury, Caleb Martin, Saml. Worth, John Woodward, Jos. Woodward, Sarah Woodward, Wm. Woodward, Wm. Woodward (carpenter), Robt. Woodward, Robt. Wilson, Jas. Woodward, John Young, Archibald Young, John Young, Jr.


EAST BRANDYWINE AND WEST BRANDYWINE.


The township of Brandywine was erected from the northern part of East Caln township in 1790, and extended northward to the southern line of Springton Manor. It received its name from the stream by the two branches of which it was bounded respectively on its east and west sides. It was divided into East Brandywine and West Brandywine in 1844. In 1853 a small part of the southern end of West Brandywine was taken in the formation of Valley township, and in 1859 the line between East Brandywine and West Brandywine was altered in a part of its course so as to include in West Brandywine a part of East Brandywine. In 1860 West Brandywine was enlarged on the north by a. considerable addition to it from the southeast corner of Honey-brook and the western part of Wallace. This addition included the Presbyterian church commonly known as Brandywine Manor, which theretofore had been in Honey-brook.


The name" Brandywine Manor" being borne in common parlance by this church, and there being also a post-office of the same name, has given the inipression that there was a manor of that name. This, however, was not the case. There never was a manor created by William Penn or his heirs bearing the name of Brandywine. The church above referred to is situated upon lands which formed part of the manor of Springton. This manor embraced the greater part of what is now Wallace township, and also a part of the present township of West Brandywine, and perhaps of other townships. The church above referred to has been ecclesiastically known from the earliest period of its history to the present time as the " Forks of Brandywine," and being located on manor-land, it became popularly known as the " Manor church," to which Brandywine, from the name of the church, would naturally be added. It is commonly spoken of, even at the present day, by those residing in the vicinage, as the " Manor church."


On the north line of the two townships a survey was made in 1714, for George Claypoole, of 1820 acres. South of this William Branson, of Philadelphia, held 1275 acres. In 1799 the number of taxables was 193.


CALN, EAST CALN, AND WEST CALN.


Caln township originally included the territory now embraced in Caln, East Caln, West Cain, East Brandywine, West Brandywine, and a part of Valley township, and the borough of Downingtown, and that part of Coatesville lying east of the west branch of Brandywine. It was named from the town of Caine, in Wiltshire, England, whence some of the early settlers came. In 1702, and about that time, surveys were made, extending from the Welsh tract (the western line of Whiteland) on the east to the west branch of Brandywine on the west, mostly confined to the valley. These surveys were afterwards extended northward and northwesterly.


Joseph Cloud, Richard Cloud, and George Mendenhall, all of Caln, were indicted for an assault on Joseph Hickman, in his house, in Caln, April 6,1709. In 1714, Peter Taylor was constable for Caln, which shows an organization at that date. The assessment of 1715 here follows :





Aaron Mendenhall

Thomas Moore

Peter Taylor

William Cloud

Isaac Vernon

Joseph Cloud

John Mendenhall

William fflemin

James Swaffer

William Taylor


Non-resident Land


John Baldwin

£ s. d.

0 3 6

0 4 2

0 2 6

0 2 6

0 3 6

0 3 6

0 4 0

0 2 6

0 2 6

0 0 10




0 5 0


John Parker

Daniel Smith

Philip Roman

Anthony Morris

Richard Webb


ffree Men


John Richards

Thomas Efford


Total

£ s. d.

0 4 2

0 8 4

0 1 5

0 3 11

0 4 7




0 4 0

0 4 0


3 4 11



Nov. 26, 1728, a petition to the following effect was presented to the court :


" That your Petitioners Labouring under many difficulties by reason of the Largeness of the said Township, which was never yet Bounded but on the East Side Joyning Whiteland Town : That the Said Town Extends in Length above fourteen miles, and in breadth near fourteen miles, That the farthest Setlers back from the Great Road leading to Philadelphia, living so Remote from the Said Road Seldom have notice to come down to repair it, which often wants by reason its, so abused and cut with the Dutch Waggons which daily pass and Repass along the Said Road.


" Inasmuch as the Said Township is large Enough to be Devided into Two, your Petitioners Humbly desire for the Ease of the said Township that it may be Decided and that the Bounds of ye Township of Caln may begin at the line of Whiteland on the South Side of the said Town of Caln and so Extend from the Said line Westerly along the Valley Mountain to the West BranCaln Gf Brandywine Creek, then up the Said Branch Northerly to the plantation of Joseph Darlington, then Easterly Along the Mountain Between ye plantation of Thomas Elderidg and the Indian Town to David Roberts, then to the Bounds of Uwchland.


"That the Remaining part of the Town being Large Enough for a Non-residents Humbly Desired by your Petitioners it may be called Spefforth.* Wherefore your Petitioners Humbly Desire that you will


* Another name—perhaps " Caffrove"—was inserted in the petition, but afterwards crossed off, and Spofforth, or Spofforth, written in the margin.


168 - HISTORY OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.


take this into your Consideration and to allow the Said Township of Cain to be Devided and Bounded as is before set forth, and yr Petirs will pray, &c.



" William Heald.

Samuel Bishop.

John Daveson.

William Sinkler.

Will. Nichols.

William Dural.

Richard Hughs.

Thomas Vernon.

Arthur White.

William Gregory

Edmund Gregory

Thomas Dawson.

Edward Thompson

Thomas Eldridge

Peter Whitaker

Thomas Parke

Pierre Bizallion.

David Evans.

Thomas Moore.

Peter Whitaker.

Robert Miller.

Joseph Griffiths.

Jason Cloud.

Aaron Mendenhall.

Llewelin Parry.

Edward Irwin

James Bruce.

Thomas Heald.

Joseph Darlinton.

Samuel McKinley.

Thomas Ramsey."




This petition is indorsed " allowed," but there is no further evidence of a township called Spefforth, in lieu of which West Caln appears. The bounds given are rather indefinite, and did not include a large tract of 1820 acres on the north, which was subsequently added.


The inhabitants of East Cain petitioned for a determination of their boundaries,* May 29, 1739, whereupon,—


" It is ordered that the said Township of East Caln shall be bounded and limitted as folio weth viz Beginning at a post being the South East Corner of the land late of John Baldwin thence west along the said Baldwins south line three hundred and forty-nine aches to a black oak thence south ninty two Aches to a hickery thence south eighty-five Degrees west Two hundred pches to a Chesnut tree by the north branch of Brandewine Creek at a Corner of William Claytons land then up the same Branch Two hundred Aches to the line of the land late of George Ashton thence West by South by the same and by Abel Parkes Land Three hundred and forty ches to a corner thence west along the south end of Phineas Lewis and Phillip Romans Land Two hundred and seventy-six aches to a Corner thence South one hundred and Eight aches to a Black oak at a Corner of William Pimms land thence west along the south end of the said Pimms Patrick Miller and Robert Millers Lands seven hundred and twenty-one aches to a Corner then by ye Lands of Moses Coates Peter Bazalion and William Fleming West by South five hundred and ffifty aches to the west branch of Brandewine Creek then up the same on the several Courses thereof about fifteen hundred aches to a black oak at the north west Corner of Joseph Darlington's land then west one hundred and Eighty nine ches to the southwest Corner of George Claypooles land thence north three hundred and forty three ches to a black oak being ye northwest Corner of the said Claypooles land thence east by Springtown Manor twelve hundred and forty-eight pches to a post at a Corner of the said Manor and from thence east four hundred and twenty aches to the said north branch of Brandewine Creek then down ye same on the several Courses thereof about nine hundred aches to the north line of a Tract of land lately survey d to Thomas Moore thence cast about Hive hundred and eighty pches to the welsh line thence along the said line South twenty four Degrees east about five hundred and ten aches to the South east Corner of Lewellin Parrys land thence south sixty degrees west one hundred and forty three aches and South sixty five pches to the place of beginning."


At a court held May 29, 1744, upon the petition of the inhabitants of West Caln,-


" It is ordered that the sd Township of West Cain shall be bounded and Limited as followeth viz Beginning at a Black oak by the West Branch of Brandywine Creek at the northwest corner of Joseph Dar, lington's Land thence by the land late of George Claypoole West 189 prs to a post and north 343 ps to a Black oak at the northwest


* One of the "stock" phrases in petitions for settling boundaries of townships was that while they remained uncertain "your petitioners are in great danger of being infested with profligate persons, who flee hither from the neighboring provinces."


corner of the sd Claypole's land thence on a due west course to the division line of the Counties of Chester and Lancaster thence southward along the ad division line to the south side of a Tract of Land formerly surveyed to Thomas Clarke and from thence by a Straight Line to a white oak at the southwest corner of Hugh De Venny's Land thence along the lines between the Land of the sd De Venny and the land of Walter Guilkey & Wm Ferguson to the sd Hugh De Venny's southeast corner post thence along a line between the land of the said Wm Ferguson and Adam Leech and the land of Robert Sandford to the said Sandfords south West corner black oak and from thence along the southern boundaries of the Lands of the sd Robert Sandford, John Williams, Hugh Cowen & John Kinkead to a Black oak at the South East corner of the ad Kinkead's land from thence due east to the sd western branch of Brandywine Creek thence up the same to the first mentioned black oak.


"And it is further ordered that the Plantations of Walter Guilkey, William Ferguson and Adam Leech and all other seats and improvements Lying on the Valley Mountain to the South of the Southern boundaries of the sd Township of West Caln shall belong to the Township of Sadbury in the sd County of Chester and are hereby Annexed to the same."


East Caln was reduced in size in 1790 by the erection of Brandywine township, which was taken from its northern part in that year. It was again reduced in size in the formation of Valley township on the west in 1853. In 1859 it was still further reduced by the incorporation of the borough of Downingtown. In 1868 it was again divided, the part lying east of the east branch of the Brandywine retaining the name of East Caln, and the remainder, with the part of Valley township lying east of the borough of Coatesville, taking the original name of Caln. West Caln was slightly reduced in size in 1853, in the erection of Valley township on the southeast. From 1790 to 1853 East Cain was a long, narrow township, extending from the west branch of the Brandywine to the western line of West Whiteland, a distance of over nine miles. The greater part of the present townships of Caln and East Caln lie in the valley and contain beautiful farming-lands, while West Caln is more hilly.


The committee, appointed by the court, who formed the new township of Caln, in 1868, recommended to the court that it be called Wawassan, but this was not satisfactory to the residents, and the name of Caln was given to it. This was deemed appropriate by reason of the new township embracing the heart of the old original township of Caln, and having within its limits a post-office and railroad station bearing that name.


Among the early settlers and owners of land in East Caln were the names of Baldwin, Cloud, Moore, Parker, Taylor, and Vernon ; in Caln, the names of Aston, Hunt, Lewis, Miller, Pim, Parke, Roman, Coates, Bizallion, Musgrove, and Mendenhall ; in West Caln, the names of Sharpless, Swayne, Sinkler (St. Clair), Way, White, Weaver, and Dawson. Peter Bizallion was a French trader among the Indians for some time, but finally settled here.


EAST CALN TAX ABLES, 1753.


Roger Hunt, Martha Bizallian, Thomas Downing, Richard Downing, John Downing, Robert Miller, Thomas Pim, Richard Pim, Thomas Parke, Phinehas Lewis, Aaron Mendenhall, Joshua Baldwin, John Baldwin, Bartholomew Bird, Jason Cloud, Robert Valentine, Joshua Roman, James Mendenhall, Thomas Stalker, Thomas Coates, John Little, James Fleming, Peter Fleming, Agnes Harris, Andrew Cox, John Walker, John Mendenhall, Bryan McGee, William Littler, Charles Carroll, John Davison, James Moore, Thomas Pain, William Wright, Robert Mirick, John White, William Wilson, Guyan Moore,


TOWNSHIPS AND BOROUGHS, ETC. - 169


John Wall, Mary Darlington, Robert Darlington, Sarah Irwin, James Cunningham, Robert Irwin, Theophilus Irwin, John Gillylan, Samuel Fisher, Thomas Fisher, James Jack, Andrew Hemphill, Samuel McKenly, Andrew Elliot, John Man, Peter Whitaker, John Whitaker, John Smith, Patrick Lockhart, Richard Buffinton, John McDermot, John Morgan, Thomas Green, Jr., Thomas Green, John Green, William Paterson, John Culberson, Joseph Eldridge, Thomas Evans, John Byars, Samuel Byars, John Barr, Moses Waite, John Long, William Brue, Richard Guest, John Brownlee, William Smart, James MeFarIon, Abel Whitaker, Alexander MeClane, John Maarlan, Hugh Stalker, Thomas Temple, Patrick Skelton, Alexander Nesbitt, Hugh Morgan.


Inmates.—John Jones, James Packer, William Roberts, Isaac Thomson, John Chamberlin, Francis Fisher, William McLane, George Menagh, John Paterson Hills, George Phillip, John Scott, Owen Sulivan, Archibald Irwin, William Berry, David McCreary, James Doraugh, John McKee, Denis Moley, John Irwin, Thomas Awlcott.


Freemen.—Andrew Knox, John Gaa, Robert Eaches, Jonathan Valentine, Matthew Taylor, James Gowdy, John Headen, Gilbert Anderson, Patrick Duffy, William Pearson, James Gibbons, James Koony, Roger O'Develin, Joseph Taylor, Moses Horen, Charles Read, James Campbell, Patrick McGowan, Jonathan Stalker, Joseph Cashin, Bryan McKune, Robert Ross, Joseph McMin, Stephen Brown, John. Cahoon, Hugh Ratchford, Joshua Hardin, George McFarlan.


LAND-OWNERS, 1774.


Joseph Downing, Joshua Baldwin, John Baldwin, Jason Cloud, William Barry, George Buchanan, Abiah Parke, Richard Cheyne, John Downing, Henry Barker, Richard Downing, Robert Valentine, Jonathan Parke, David Jenkins, William Baldwin, Jona. Hoops, William Roberts, Isaac Webb, James Sheward, Samuel Hunt, James Hood, Jona. Valentine, Anne Parke, Obed Lewis, John Hoops, Griffith Mendenhall, Robert Valentine, Jr., Curtis Lewis, Rachel Roman, Hannah Pym, Thomas Stalker, Warwick Miller, Esq., Thomas Coats, Isaac Coats, Moses Coats, Mary Hart, Alexander Fleman (Fleming), Joseph Fleman, Peter Fleman, James Thomson, Robert Elton, Andrew Cox, Thomas White, Joseph Arbuckle, James McKelby, Samuel Pickins, Samuel White, Andrew Culbertson, James Clark, John Carmichal, William Wilson, George Kennedy, Robert Wilson, John Walker, John Proudfoot, Mary Cox, Francis Zook, Samuel Thompson, Joshua Mendenhall, Adam Guthry, William Iddings, James Lockhart, Ludwick Liggett, Thomas Windle, Richard Buffington, James Guthry, Andrew Elliott, Joseph McKinley, Thomas Fisher, Robert Darlington, Samuel Rolliday, Arch. Irwin, William Wilson, William Long, John Gileylen, James Jack, Joseph Long, James Stanley, John Smith, Henry Lewis, Isaac Green, Isabel Irwin, Theophilus Irwin, Samuel Culbertson, Robert Lockhart, James Hanson, William Todd, John Culbertson, James McGlaughlin, William Johnston, John Sloan, Charles Jack, James Miller, Michael Miller.


WEST CALN TAXABLES, 1753.


John Miller, Esq., Thomas Clark, William Mathers, Hugh Gib, Jr., Robert Stanford, James Cooper, Evan Wilkinson, John Williams, John Davidson, James Wilson, William Martin, Oliver Crawford, William Thompson, Robert Withrow, Samuel Withrow, Joshua Swain, James Way, Caleb Swain, John Sinkler, William Sinkler, Nathaniel White, Evan Lewis, Joseph Bishop, Sr., William Brown, Thomas Sharp, Hugh Shearer, Hamilton Gamble, William McCown, Peter Bab, John Jack, Mary Doak, Henry Hunter, William Gregory, John Cambell, Samuel Love, Thomas and Alexander Rogers, John Robinson, William Dunn, Jr., Thomas Kelly, Robert Kelly, William Dunn, Sr., George Cambell, Elizabeth Davidson, Thomas Davidson, John Porter, Josias Cambell, James Cumens, James Gibs, Sr., Josias Wallis, Thomas Dawson, Abraham Dawson, Richard Hope, Samuel Henry, Samuel McKeece, Mathew Rogers, William finley, John forgus, Samuel Clyde, George Sinkler, John Boyd, Joseph Clark, James Gaby, William Hamilton, William Davidson, Francis Jonson, William Clingan, Thomas Brown, Joseph Bishop, Hugh Gibs, Sr., William Richardson, John Harper, Edward Magnor, James Guthre, John Love, James Jemison, Finley McCown, James Keys.


Inmates.—Robert Orr, Isaac Santford, Hugh Martin, John McNabb, Joseph Harper, John fre, Samuel Wilson, George Campbell, George Bell, William Dickey, James Gilmor.


Freemen.—William Fulton, Robert Dobson, John fullow, Gideon


- 22 -


Wilson, Robert Robinson, William Wallace, John Maflin, William Sinkler.


LAND-OWNERS, 1774.


Caleb Way, James Keys, William . Hunter, Nathaniel Maxwell, William Crawford, John Fleming, Joseph Gladney, Samuel Witherow, Robert Witherow, Edward Vernon, Gabriel Walker, George Harris, Samson Babb, John Edge, Samuel Denny, Mary Babb, John Jack, John Parkehill, John Long, William Neeley, William Kennedy, Thomas Boid; James Brown, Matthew Ferguson, Charles Campbell, Robert Gamble, Oliver Wallace, James Martin, Alexander Rogers, William Shearer, Joseph Bishop, David Lewis, Job .Sinkler, George Quaintance, Alexander Davidson, Thomas Wilson, Thomas Law, Michael Boldridge, Sarah Keys, Samuel Fisher, William McGloughlin, Richard Hope, Joseph Parke, John Stalker, Margaret Dawson, John Griffith, Francis Alexander, Robert McPherson, Alexander McPherson, John Cochran; Arthur O'Neale, Andrew Jack, John McCullough, James Douglass, Thomas Douglass, Samuel Atley, John Linsey, Joseph Gardner, Joseph Clark, Herman Stiles, Barbara Wagoner, Joint Marshall, Thomas Kennedy, Gilbert Gibbs, Benjamin Wallace, Francis Kincade, William Moore, William Bennett, William Davidson, William Crawford, James Pierce, James Clemson, Peter Whitaker, Joseph Ash, Mary Way, Robert Cortney, William Witherow, James Goudey, William Clingham (Clingan), Robert Robeson, Zaphaniah Davis, Robert Kelley; James Kelley, Richard Cox, Josiah Wallace, John Martin, John Wallace, Patrick Porter, William Henry, Francis Daneson, William Logan, and Joseph Bishop.


CHARLESTOWN.


Charlestown township and the stream of water which flows through it were named in honor of Charles Pickering, of Asmore, in the county of Chester, England, his first name—Charles--being given to the township, and his surname—Pickering to the creek. Charles Pickering was an Englishman who, it is said, crossed the ocean with William Penn, and wandered up the Schuylkill River in search of treasure. Supposing that he had discovered traces of silver on the banks of the stream which now bears his name, and believing that the neighboring hills contained large quantities of the precious metal, he returned to Philadelphia, and obtained from Penn a grant of a large tract of land bordering upon the stream. He subsequently dug u.p and sent to England a large quantity of the supposed precious metal for analysis. What the result was is not known, but it is supposed it was unfavorable, as the efforts at mining were abandoned. Traces of the excavations made in these mining operations are said to be still visible.


In 1683, Pickering was tried for setting' up a private mint for the " Quoining of Spanish Bitts and Boston money," for which he was fined forty pounds, and directed to redeem all that had been issued. It does not appear that this was followed by any social condemnation, and the Council, on the 14th of 3d month, 1685, passed a resolution declaring that, in privileges and freedom, he stood in " Equal Capacity" with the other colonists. He was afterwards drowned while crossing the ocean, and his land in Chester County was divided between sixteen. of his friends, to whom he had, devised it. In the assessment of 1715 it appears as follows:


THE LAND LATE OF CHARLES PICKERING—RATE.




David Lloyd 1600a

Samuel Buckley 500

John Moore 340a

Griffith Jones 340a

Joseph Pidgeon 340a

Tho : Tress 340a

Joshua Carpenter 340a

Sam. Carpenter 1620a

William Sanders 340a

£. s. d.

0 6 8

0 2 1

0 1 5

0 1 5

0 1 5

0 1 5

0 1 5

0 4 7

0 1 5


Joseph Richards 340

Griffith Pritchet 340a

John Jones 340a

Henry fflower 340a

Sam. Richardson Do

Edward Shippen Do

ffrancis Rawles

£ s. d.

0 1 5

0 1 5

0 1 5

0 1 5

0 1 5

0 1 5

0 1 5

1 11 9



170 - HISTORY OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.


In 1718, " Pickering's Lotts," 4640 acres, were included in the non-resident land of Whiteland assessment, and it is not till 1722 that we get the names of actual settlers in the " Charles Town Rate," with the valuation of their estates :



Francis Buckholder and his sons

Samuel Richardson

John Humphreys

James Jones

Philip Jones

David Jones

Llewelyn David

Griffith Pritchard

Mathias Martin

Alexander Owen

John Rees

Manuel Jones

Thomas John

Stephen David

38

28

30

24

16

20

16

26

22

12

10

16

34

16

James Anderson

Harry Griffith

Lewis Martyn


Non-resident Land.


Cocks & Company 20,000 acres.

London Tract

John Moor

Joshua Carpenter

John Bud

Sam. Buckley

Pike's Land

18

15

20




1400

210

21

21

10

35

700




In this year Thomas John was constable, being the first in the township. The tax-rate was threepence in the pound. In 1724 we find also the names of William Moore, John David, David Giby, John Powell, David, James, and Philip John (instead of Jones), Thomas David, John, Joseph, and Jacob Buckwalder, Benjamin Villaur, John Evan, Griffith and Asariah Thomas, and John Jones.


William Penn, in 1681, conveyed to his sister, Margaret Lowther, and her family, 10,000 acres of land, in right of which a tract called the " Manor of Bilton" was laid out on the west side of Schuylkill, and separated from the "Manor of Mount Joy" by the Valley Creek. In 1733 it was resurveyed, and found to contain 2850 acres, being the southeastern part of Charlestown township. In 1737, William Allen, Esq., of Philadelphia, became the owner of the manor, and in 1739 he sold it to John Parry, of Haver-ford. The land was then divided between the following persons : William John Adam, 500 acres ; Widow Matthias, 263 ; John Jones, 500 ; William Griffith, 174 ; Cadwalader Hugh, 176 ; Griffith Thomas, 235 ; Thomas James, George Rees and William Lloyd, 430 ; Thomas Howell, 366 ; Jenkin David, 200 ; and Katharine Rees, 151 acres.


David Lloyd took up 950 acres on the west side of French Creek, at its mouth, in right of a warrant to John Henry Sproegle, in right of Benjohan Furly. The warrant was dated 11, 20, 1708, and the survey made 2, 6, 1712. He also took up 650 acres on the other side of the creek at the same time, in right of a warrant to Francis Cooke. The whole was patented to Lloyd in 1713, under the name of " Manavon," from the place of his birth in Wales. He never settled thereon, but in 1720 sold the 650 acres to Francis Buckwalter, and in 1731 James Starr bought 350 and Moses Coates 600 acres, the balance of the land at this point. These grantees of Lloyd were the first settlers at what is now Phoenixville.


Moses Coates and John David, overseers of the poor, petitioned the Court 12, 28, 1737-8, complaining of the uncertain boundaries, and asking the confirmation of certain bounds according to a survey which they had obtained at their own charge, as follows :


" Beginning at the west side of Schuylkil by the mouth of a small Branch Called Stony run thence South West by Joseph Pykes land about seven miles and a half to a Corner Chestnutt by a small Brook being the North West Corner of 1600 acres of land late of John Budds Thence by the same South East seven Rods to a Corner in the Line of the Welsh Tract thence by the same East by North Eight miles and one Rod to the Value Creek then Down the same Between Mount Joy on the South and Mount Sorrow on the North about one mile to Schuylkil then upon the several! Courses thereof to the place of Begining Containing by Computation Twelve Thousand nine hundred and fifty acres. Surveyed the seventh day of the Twelfth Month Anno Dom 1737-8.


"by RICHARD JONES.


"The above boundarys of the township of Charles Town was orderel to be Recorded the thirtieth Day of May 1738.


"P. Jo: PARKER, Cler."


The township was divided in the year 1826, and the eastern division, lying along the river, called Schuylkill township, the name Charlestown being retained by the western division. In 1827 the lines between the southwestern part of Charlestown and the townships of East and West Whiteland and Uwchlan were altered, the former survey having been defective or incorrectly reported. The early settlers of Charlestown were mostly Welsh, followed by some from Germany.


CHARLESTOWN TAXABLES, 1753.


Will : Moore, Esqr, Lewis Morgan, Daniel John, Lewis Martin, Griffeth John, Lluelin Martin, Emanuel Jones, Joseph Byers, Rees David, Wm Thomas, Thos Robert, Moses Coates, James Balla, David Humphrey, John Buckwalter, Aaron Coates, Jacob Mary, John Lyons, John James, Thus David, Hugh Frazer, Moses Coates, Junr, John David, David Davis, David John, Anthony Prichard, Dan' Goldsmith, James Williams, Thos Valentine, Jonathan Davis, John Thomas, John Griffeth, John Evans, Lluellin Davies, James John, Daniel Beaton, John Thomas, John Commins, David Davis, John Conaway, John Gallacher, John Criswell, William Grimes, Job Harry, Joseph Williams, Bastian Wagoner, Jonathan Coates, Joseph Starr, Evan Jenken, Jonathan Worrall, Thos Davis, David Davis, David Thomas, Peter Matthews, David Matthias, George Martin, Patrick Henderson, Llewellin Davis Smith, John Williams, David Rees, Daniel Shea, Jeremiah Pike.


Freemen.—Alexander Balla, James Richason, John Richason, Thos Steegleets, Dominick Kelly, Farrell O'farcy, George Anderson, Samuel Starr.


LAND-OWNERS, 1774.


Patrick Anderson, Joseph Alexander, John Buckwalter, Frederick Bussard, John Buckwalter, William Bodley, Benjamin Boyers, Elias Brown, Anne Boyers, Daniel Buckwalter, Moses Coates, Jonathan Coates, Benjamin Coates, James Cloyd, Jacob Cauffman, Joseph Conrad, Alexander Campbell, John Coon, Christopher Coon, Llewellyn Davis, Jenkin Davis, David Davis, William Deweese, Israel Davis, Abner Evans, John Francis, Nicholas Foose, Valentine Foose, William Fussel, Frederick Geerhart, John Griffith, John Griffith (schoolmaster), William Graham, Nicholas Halderman, Christian Halderman, Samuel Harvey, John Humphrey, Jacob Hoomel, Nicholas Halderman, Jr., David John, Griffith Jones, David James, John Keiter, Benjamin Longstreth, George Late, Edwin Lane, William Moore, Esq., Alexander McAuley, George McKenny, James Martin, Joel Martin, Henry Miller, Isaac Morgan, Jacob Miller, Christian Mary, Anthony Pritchard, Jacob Pennypacker, Thomas Robinson, Daniel Rossiter, Thomas Roberts, John Richardson, Philip Rapp, Joseph Snarr, Joseph Starr, Jr., Joseph Smith, Joseph Showalter, Martin Shenbolk, Jacob Sturk, Amos Thomas, Andrew Turk, Benjamin Thomas, Richard Tompkins, James Thomas, John Varley, John Vergloth, David Williams, Thomas Williams, Sebastian Wagoner, James White, Christian Whitaker, Jonathan Wells, John Youngblood, Robert Kennedy, James McConell, Michael King, Jane Martin, Matthias Pennypacker, and Michael Holman.


CHESTER.


This was probably the first named of the townships in the county, and the town of the same name remained the county-seat for more than one hundred years thereafter. It is now a part of Delaware County. From the spread of families backward from the first settlements, the lists of taxables in the old townships will be of interest to our


TOWNSHIPS AND BOROUGHS, ETC. - 171


present citizens. The assessment list for 1715 for Chester is here given :


CHESTER RATE.




Jasper Yeates for his estate in Chester

Tobias Hendrickson

John Wright

John Salkeld

Francis Worley.

Jacob Roman

Thomas Bright

Jeremiah Carter

Thomas Baldwin

William Coebourn

Thomas Coebourn

John Linvill

James Streeter

Hen Worley

Caleb Pusey

Jonas Sandelands

John Wade

Isaac Barton.

Samuel Tomlinson

Nicholas Fairlamb

Evan Morgan

John Hoskins

John Baldwin

James Barber

John Scarlet

Jacob Howell

Joseph Coebourn

David Lloyd

William Heurtin

£ s. d.


0 12 6

0 5 4

0 5 2

0 7 2

0 7 2

0 4 8

0 1 0

0 4 2

0 3 2

0 2 0

0 4 0

0 1 0

0 2 6

0 15 6

0 5 6

0 10 0

0 3 7

0 1 0

0 1 6

0 4 2

0 3 0

0 6 0

0 4 6

0 1 3

0 2 8

0 4 6

0 19 6

0 13 4

0 3 0


John Rimington

Robert Hodgson

James Logan

George Woodyer

George Simpson

John Tyler

Joseph Richards

John Scott

Edward Dangger

Thomas Weston.

William Tidmarsh

David Roberts

Rd. Marsden


ffree Men.


Caleb Coupland

William Lee

John Price

Henry Baker

Nicholas Powell

John Saul

William Maultsby

James Reece

Albert Skere

Thomas Lancaster

Joseph Parker

James Bond


Total

£ s. d.

0 2 6

0 1 6

0 5 0

0 3 2

0 1 6

0 2 6

0 8 6

0 1 6

0 2 6

0 2 2

0 3 2

0 2 0

0 1 6




0 4 0

0 1 6

0 1 6

0 4 0

0 4 0

0 4 0

0 4 0

0 4 0

0 4 0

0 4 0

0 4 0

0 4 0 —

10 1 4




CHICHESTER.


This name was given to Marcus Hook April 20, 1682, and the name was subsequently applied to the townships styled Upper and Lower Chichester, both now in Delaware County. In 1715 the taxables in the lower part were:


Philip Roman, Jonah Roman, Robert Roman, John Rawson, Richard Bezer, Philip Pedrick, Anthony Baldwin, William Flower, Mordecai Howell, John Royley, Richard Edwards, William Clayton, William Hewes, William Hewes, Jr., John Hopton, Richard Crosby, John Boss.


Freemen.—John Flower, Thomas Clayton, and Thomas Howell.


Those in Upper Chichester were :


Enoch Flower, William Chandler, Walter Marten, Henry Reynolds, Francis Reynolds, Ruth Chandler, George Leonard, Francis Routh, Matthew Wood, John Bezer, John Kingsman, Humphrey Scarlet, James Whitaker, Shadreck Scarlet, Thomas Linvill, Thomas Withers, Jeremiah Collett, John Chambers, Richard Weaver, Jeremiah Cloud.


Freeman.—Richard Mashell.


COATESVILLE.


The borough of Coatesville was incorporated by the Court of Quarter Sessions of Chester County in 1867. It was taken wholly from Valley township, and is situated in the Great Valley, where it is crossed by the west branch of Brandywine, and embraces territory on both sides of that stream. A village long known as Midway, situated on the Pennsylvania Railroad west of the Brandywine, was included within its boundaries, and is now generally known in common parlance as West Coatesville. The village of Midway was just half-way between Philadelphia and Columbia, the original termini of the railroad, and hence its name.


Coatesville was named in honor of the Coates family. Moses Coates, the ancestor of the family, with his wife Susanna, came from Ireland about 1717, and settled in Charlestown township, Chester County, whence some of their children removed to East Caln. William Fleming was a settler near Coatesville. His wife Mary was a sister of John and Thomas Moore, who settled at Downingtown. The Fleming family are now quite numerous. At an early period they owned a considerable quantity of land in the Great Valley, on both sides of the west branch of Brandywine.


The noted marauder during the Revolutionary war, James Fitzpatrick, had one of his hiding-places at what was known as Hand's Pass, a gap in the North Valley Hill, a short distance west of Coatesville, near where the Philadelphia and Lancaster turnpike leaves the valley.


Coatesville is situated on the Pennsylvania and the Wilmington and Northern Railroads, and is the centre of a considerable iron manufacture.


CONCORD.


This township, according to the assessment of 1715, contained the following taxables:


Nath. Newlin, Jur., Nicholas Pyle for ye mill, James Clamston, Nath. Newlin, Senr., Joseph Cloud, Henry Oburn, John Palmer, John Palmer, Jur., Godwin Walter, George Robinson, Jacob Pyle, Ralph Pyle, Henry Peirce, Matthias Carle, Ralph Evenson, James Heavrd, William Ammet, Thomas Smith, John Lee, Robert Chamberlin, Robert Chamberlin, Junr, Thomas West, William Hill, Morgan Jones, Thomas Durnall, George Lee, Daniel Evans, Joseph Nicklin, John Hanum, Benjm Mendenhall, John Mendenhall, John Newlin, Joseph Edwards, Thomas Broom, William fforde, ffrancis Pulin, John Pen-neck, James Chiffers, John Hackney, Christopher Penock.


ffreemen.—Caleb Pearkins, Richard ffarr, Peter Poulston, John Pennock, John Engram, Henry Jones, Thomas Ealthan.


This township is now in Delaware County.


CONESTOGA.


First mentioned in the assessment of 1718 :


English Inhabitants.—Francis Warley, John Cartliedge, James Hendricks, James Letart, James Patterson, William Sherrel, John Hendricks, Collum Macquair, Thomas Baldwin, Thomas Gale, Alexander Beuse, John McDaniel, Richard Carter, John Linvill, Robert Wilkins, John ffarrer, John Grist, William Hughes, Peter Basillion, John Comb, Joseph Roe, Andrew Mason, Joseph Hickman, Daniel Cookson, Thomas Clark, William Clark, Stephen Atkinson, Morgan Jones, Edmund Cartliedge, collector.


freemen.—John Harriss, David Preece, Robert Middleton, Richard Grice, Nathaniel Christopher, Thomas Perrin, Samuel Birchfield, William Ludford, Thomas Wilkin, James Davis, Evan Evans, Thomas Jones.


Dutch Inhabitants.—Martin Kundig, Martin Milin, Christian Heer, John Haer, Wendall Bowman, Jacob Miller, Joseph Steman, Daniel Harmer, John Miller, John Funk, Henry Carpenture, Henry Hayne, Christopher ffranciscus, Peter Bellar, Benedictus Venrick, Daniel ffierre, John ffierre, Phillip ffierre, Isaac Lefevre, Richard Davis, Thomas ffalkner, John Milen, Hans Haure, John Taylor, Martyn Berr, Imanuel Heer, Henry Kundic & Son, Jacob Moyer, Hans Steff, Hans Keague, Jacob Griter, Jacob Highstetter, John Widwer, Andrew Koffman, Isaac Koffman, John Broakpather, Junr, John Broakpather, Jacob Broakpather, Peter Swaor, Abraham Heer, Melchior Arisman, Christian Hearse & Son, John Toup, Henry Berr, Michel Bowman, Hance Bugholder, Hance Neicomer, Melchior Prenamon, George Kendrick, John Natts, Jun*, Michael Shank, Junr, John Natts, Senr., Henry flunk, Benjamin Wilmer, Jacob Lundus, Hance Henry Neff, Michael Miller, ffelix Londus, Jacob Kundrick, Junr, John fframe, Charley Christopher, Woolrick Mowry, Stoffal Prenaman, Jacob Hoober, Christian Stone, Isaac ffrederick & Son, Jacob Kundrick, Jacob Lundus, Junr., Martyn Boyer, Hance Boyer, John Bowman, Benedictus Brockbill, Christian Shank, Michael Shank, Senr, John Shank, Rudey Moyer, Hance Brand, Hans Graff, Junr, Hans Graff, Senr, Peter Yorte, Torey Ebys, Hans Currick Moyer, Christian Shans, Hans Weaver, Woolrick Hource, Peter Leman.


Non-resident Lands upon the River Pequea.—James Logan, 1000 acres; Rebecca Shaw, 300; Elizabeth Pace, 250; John Marlow, 250; Thomas Story, 1768; Abraham Dubois, 1000; Herman Ritzman, 1100;


172 - HISTORY OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.


Amos Strettle, 3380; Richard Robinson, 1000; William Bradford, 125; Coll John ffrench, 500; Jeremiah Langhorne, 350; John Bundile, 500 ; Coll John Evans, 1000.

Conestoga became a part of Lancaster County in 1729.


NORTH COVENTRY, SOUTH COVENTRY, AND

EAST COVENTRY.


The original township of Coventry doubtless received its name from Samuel Nutt, an early settler, who came from Coventry, in Warwickshire, England. The first list of settlers in these parts is from the assessment of 1718, as follows :


THE RATE OF THE HIGHEST DISTRICT FROM SKOOL-

KILL TO BRANDIWINE.




Israel Robinson

John Sinclair

John Rumford

Thomas Miller

Richard Duncley

*Johannes Wolf Miller

*Andro Secler

*Mathias Ringer

*Meulin Verner

*Rodle ffrie

Marcus Overhult

*Jacob Stagger

John Oburne

Henry Castle

Hubert Castle.

*Johannes Kolb

Henry Bonchells

Jacob Bouchells

Henry Parker

£ s. d.

0 6 3

0 2 6

0 2 6

0 6 3

0 3 9

0 2 1

0 2 1

0 2 1

0 4 4

0 2 6

0 3 9

0 1 10

0 1 3

0 3 9

0 2 6

0 6 3

0 2 6

0 3 3

0 3 3


Edward Snout

*Abraham Lungeger

John Rutter

Garret Prompter

Simon Meredith

David Evans et

James Pugh.

William Phillips

Owen Roberts

John Blare


Non-resident Lands


James Logan, 1000a

Jonathan Gwyn, 1000a

David Powell, 1000a

Thos. Callowhill, 500a

£ s. d.

0 1 10½

0 1 10½

0 2 6

0 7 6

0 3 9

0 8 9

0 2 6

0 12 6

0 4 0




0 12 6

0 12 6

0 12 6

0 6 3


6 6 21



In 1719, " Skoolk ill District" contained the same names (except Jacob Stagger), and also Philip Rogers, William Hiddings, Edward Thomas, Richard and John Persalls, and David Roberts.


These assessments covered the northern part of the county, but in 1720 an attempt was made to divide the district as between Coventry and Nantmeal (see Nantmeal) ; and under the head of " Inhabitants upon Schoolkill above the French Creek" we find Peter Hose and others already given on page 41.


In 1722 the district was called " Scoolkil," and there were twenty-seven taxables. In 1724 we first find the name of Coventry, and the following taxables:


Samuell Nutt, Mordecay Lincoln, gorge Dandison, The Forge, Rd Dean, Israel Robinson, ffracis Huss, Henry Bell, John Sinkler, John Rumford, Thomas Miller, Richard Dunklin, Wolfe Miller, John Sickler, Frederick Long, Martyn Vrner, John Vrner, Henry Landes, John Meilin, Vbirick Langaker, Hans Swichhser, Jacob Overholt, Peter Hoofley, Hans Milin, Jacob Milin, Daniell Eaches, Marcus Overholt, Jacob Steger, Johannes Coff, Henry Castle, Johannes Hapert, Henry Buckholt, Jacob Bucholt, Margarett Parker, John Rutter.


The name of Miller seems to have become Millard, or the first may not have been the correct spelling. Martin Urner obtained a patent, July 10, 1718, for a tract on Schuylkill, the most of which was sold by his executors, in 1759, to Jacob Switzer, who sold it to Martin Urner, nephew of the former, from whom it passed to Jonas Urner, who devised the homestead, of 264 acres, to Rudolph Stauffer in 1811. John Rumford obtained title to 200 acres on the river in 1715, and sold it in 1728 to Thomas Rees or Rice. Subsequent owners were Samuel Whitacre, John Banfield, Philip John, Thomas Godfrey, and Thomas

Pratt.


* Crossed off in the record.


Hans George Shultz and Matthias Ringer obtained 500 acres, Jan. 20, 1718, which were afterwards divided between Matthias Ringer, Hans Wolfmiller, and Andrew Sickler. Wolfmiller sold his part, 169 acres, in 1749, to John Wells, to whose widow, Susanna, and children a patent was granted in 1761. Edmund and Samuel Wells, two of the children, became the owners in 1783. In 1826, Jonas Umstead -bought the property for $3869.78, and in 1830 it passed into possession of Abraham Wanger, whose son George succeeded him in 1861. James Pugh obtained a patent, Nov. 4, 1713, for 700 acres on French Creek, and on May 23, 1721, sold 300 acres thereof to Samuel Nutt, the iron-master, who had built a forge.on this or adjacent land.


In 1841 the township was divided into North Coventry and South Coventry, and in 1844 East Coventry was formed by a division of North Coventry. In the latter year the line between South Coventry and East Vincent was established, as it was supposed to have been originally run.


COVENTRY TAXABLES, 1753.


John Luellin, John Souder, Martin Orner, Christian Browers, Marks Overholts, Andrew Huts, Stephen Smith, Elizabeth Engers, Nicolas Keller (miller), Samuel Overholts, John Mainshow, Michael Sink, George Titlo, Jacob Bach, John Stoner, on Schuylkill, Casper Engel, Uley Rynhart, Henry Brower, Andrew Mefferd, Mary Ash, Adam Ash, John Mace (?), Mary Grub, Abraham Grub, Joseph Burneston, John Willson, Samuel Himelry, Hugh Hugh, Peter Wanger, Lenard Funkrufe, John Grub, Jacob Morrin, Charles Rilles, Joseph Postler, Matthias Switzer, Benjamin Thomas, Michael Rees, Justis Linderman, George Craft, Samuel Crebill, Paul Ceiser, Michal Hulderman, Jacob Grofe, Peter Imsweiler, John Stoner, John Imhoofe, Adam Morria, John Owen, James Ingles, Albertes Arroin, John Paul and Jacob Longinacor (non-residents), Thomas Millard, Christian Barry, Jacob Thomas, Anna Nutt and Robert Grace (forge Comp.), James Erbuckle, Henry Bear, John Brower, John Wells, John Swaner, John Switzer, Christopher Holderman, Cartrout Shy, Henry Shinkell, " and John his inmate," Peter Engels, Wm. Martin, Mary Richard, Jacob Hok, Frederick Borten, Jacob Uptegrave, Richard Butler, James Born, Jacob Kerkeiser, Peter Hingels, Patrick Collings, Enoch Flower, Andrew Parks, Minicus Riddle, George Grimm.


Freemen.—Peter Lookenbill, Richard Vorhan, Jacob Switzer, Christopher Hick, Rynard Cunsuhouser, John Kent, Vandel Tumfilsor, Henry Fisher, Stephen Bower, Daniel Pener, Henry Pener.


LAND-OWNERS, 1774.


James Arbuckle, Jacob Acker, John Acker, Peter Amole, Abraham Brower, Jacob Brower, Henry Brower, Henry Brower, Jr., Daniel Brower, Henry Banner, John Bowe, Henry Beer, Joseph Brooks, Daniel Beery, Peter Crumbaker, Adam Deam, Godfrey Dowenhauer, George Ditlow, John Davis, James English, Owen Evans, Conrad Grim, George Grouse, Anna Grubb, Abraham Grubb, Henry Grubb, John Highter, Rennard Gunsenhauser, Thomas Hockley, John High, Michael Halderman, Nicholas Herwick, Stopher Halderman, John Imhoff, Allan Jack, Jacob Kittingher, Jacob Keringer, Jacob Light, Jacob Longacre, Justus Linderman, Mary Keiser, Nicholas Keller, Nicholas Miller, Villdy Miller, Tobias Miller, Peter Mower, Martin Ornen, James Hockley & Potts, William Plaine, Christian Reiff, Robert Milhouse, Simon Meredy (Meredith), Abraham Moore, Jonathan Pugh, John Pugh, John Rinnard, Frederick Rinhard, Bastian Ruff, John Smith, Michael Swick, Abraham Sliver, Conrad Snither, Frederick Scholl, John Sowder, Ulrich Swither, John Switzer, Jacob Steger, John Varley, Martin. Wofe, Susanah Wells, Jacob Fetterling, Jonas Rodrough, Richard Custard, Jacob Thomas, Henry Schenkel, Eve Brower, Jacob Row, Jacob Livegood, Daniel Engle, Michael Smith, David Grubb, Frederick Huck, Rees John, Rudolph Sheneman, John Holsenberger, Ludwick Stophel, and Nicholas Munshower.


DARBY.


TAXABLES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF 1715.

 

John Bethell, Jobe Harvey, John Haycock, Edward Philpot, Benj., Cliff, John Test, Jos. Johnson (house & lot), John Sholers, Samuel

 







TOWNSHIPS AND BOROUGHS, ETC. - 173

 

Bradshaw, David Thomas, John Blunston; Senr, John Blunston, Jun, John Wood, Thomas Pulford, John Worth, Enoch Bonsall, Jacob Bonsall, Roger Bailey, Anthony Morgan, George Wood, Michell Blunston, Samuel Sellars, John Marshall, Samul Hood, John Thomas, Joshua ffearn, Thomas Bardshaw, Samuel Garrot, Wm. Garrot, Adam Roades, Thomas Lewis, Samuel Lewis, Abraham Lewis, Isaac Colier, Wm. Barnet, James Whitakers, Joseph Need, John Davis, Samuel Levis, Thomas Broom, Josiah Hibbert, John Hood, John Hallowell, William Smith, Thomas Hood, William Smith, Junr, Widdw Bartram, Richd Parker, Anthony Lee, Lewis Davis, Mathias Natcilus, Morton Mortonson, Charles Yokecam, Andrew Youran, Swan Boon, Hance Boon, Mathias Mortonson, William Northam, John Broom, Thomas Worth.

 

free Men.—Thomas Worth, John Parker, Willm Prest, John Wallis, Thomas Philips, ffrancis Youran, Thomas Edwards.

 

This township was one of the first settled in the county, but is now a part of Delaware County.

 

DONEGAL.

 

TAXABLES IN ASSESSMENT OF 1724.

 

James Le tort, James Mitchell, George Stewart, John Galbreath, Jonah Devenporte, David McClure, Alexr Hutchison, Ronald Chambers, John Alison, John Haris, Patrick Campbell, Thomas Willkens, Samuell Fulton, William Wilkens, Evin Evin, John Burt, John Gardner, Peter Allen, James Galbreath, John Mitchell, Robert Moody, Alexr McKeen, Joseph Woork, Ritchard Alison, Robert Bowhinan, James Cunnigham, Samuell Smith, James Rodey, Thomas Howard, Gordon Howard, Thomas Bailie, Willm Maybee, Willm Hay, Robert Mcfarlan, Hugh White, John Taylor, Ephram Moor, Robert Midltown, Hugh Mckeen, Willm Brams, James Smith, John Kar, Malcom Kar, John Davison, James Kyle, And, Cornish, Wm. Grant, Stephen Atkinson, Joseph Clapam, Edward Daugherty, James Patterson, John Mckerty.

 

Non-resident Land.—Jeramayi Longhorn, in bucks County; Peter Bazilon, in this County.

 

This township was organized in 1723, from a part of Conestoga, and David Jones appeared at court May 28th as constable. It is now a part of Lancaster County.

 

DOWNINGTOWN.

 

Downingtown was incorporated by decree of court May 12, 1859, and by an election held at the Swan Hotel on the 28th of that month Capt. James Lockhart was chosen first burgess. The borough limits embraced 760 acres, taken from the township of East Caln.

 

In 1702 surveys were made here in right of purchases made in England, viz. : for Joseph Cloud, 225 acres ; for Jeremiah Collett, 375 acres ; for Robert Vernon, 600 acres ; and for Daniel Smith, 1000 acres. The last tract was on the west side of the creek, its eastern line perhaps being where Downing Street is now laid. The other tracts were rectangular and lay directly east of this line, that of Cloud being mostly south of, while the Vernon tract extended farther north than, the borough limits. Joseph Hickman was perhaps the first resident owner of the Collett tract, which he sold to Thomas Moore. The latter, with his brother John, also purchased the Veron tract, but the whole 975 acres became the property of Thomas, who erected a mill on the east side of Brandywine as early as 1716. The Smith tract being divided by a north and south line, the eastern half became the property of George Aston, and subsequently, in 1739, of Roger Hunt, while the western half was purchased by Thomas Lindley, who sold in 1724 to Thomas Parke.

 

Thomas Moore died about 1736, after which the. prop erty was purchased by John Taylor, June 25, 1738, and sold by him to different persons. Thomas Downing bought 561 acres July 4, 1739, it being nearly all that lay north of the Philadelphia road. In 1752 a number of the citizens of this vicinity petitioned the commissioners for a bridge over the Brandywine, but with what success has not been discovered. In 1784 the place was generally called Milltown, but sometimes Downingstown. July 4, 1876, the citizens of Downingtown celebrated the centennial anniversary of independence by a public meeting, at which the history of the locality, prepared by Dr. John P. Edge, was read as a part of the ceremonies.

 

EASTTOWN.

 

Easttown township was erected about the year 1704. It is first mentioned on the court records by the appointment of William Thomas as its constable, on Dec. 27, 1704-5. It was doubtless so named on account of its position. Its territory was included in the original survey made for the Welsh, and was settled by them.

 

In the assessment of 1715 we thus find the

 

EASTTOWN RATE.

 



Edward Hugh

Ellis Hughes

Hugh Jones

Morgan Hugh.

Philip David

Davd Davis and Joe. Harris.

John David

Evan Thomas

Owen Hugh

£ s. d.

0 2 6

0 2 6

0 1 0

0 1 0

0 1 0


0 2 0

0 1 0

0 0 10

0 0 10


Richd Evans

Thomas Edwards


Non-resident Land


William Sharlaw

John Pugh

Owen Humphery


Total

£ s. d.

0 0 10

0 2 6




0 13 9

0 0 10

0 2 1


1 11 8



 

In 1800 the town of Glassley was laid out on the turnpike, near what is now Berwyn (late Reeseville), by Robert McClenachan. Beginning with the old Lancaster Road or High Street, we find, in succession, North, Turnpike, South and Pearl Streets. From the west end of the plot we pass from Green to Harrison, Franklin, Washington, Thompson, Wayne, and McClenachan Streets. The lots were 36 feet in front, and from 70 to 160 feet in depth. A large number were sold, but the owners neglected to improve, and for a long time the grounds were unfenced.

The township is most noted as the home of the Wayne family, the founder of which, Anthony Wayne, first appears in the assessment of 1724.

 

EASTTOWN TAXABLES, 1753.

 

Thomas McCain, Isaac Wayn, Francis Wayn, Mark Morris, Nicholas John, Peter Eliot, John McCorcle, Ann Ellis, Isaac Minshall, John Marron, Benj. Junkin, Adam Trehorn, Thomas Hingham, John Steel, Humphry Wayn, Hugh Reed, Benj. Hugh, Edward William, Griffith James, Hugh Win, Jennis Davis, Humphry Ellis, Andrew Mcguyer, Thomas John, David John, Patrick McCarty, Isaac Worrel, Elizabeth Howell, Elick-sander Nuckle, Tho Crass, Richd McCaddin, Isaac Hughs, Nathaniel Clapole, Charles Colling, Anthony Wayn, Morris Matson.

 

Inmates.—Andrew Nelson, James Porter, Arthur Moore.

 

Freemen.—Samuel Davis, John Harthorn, Isaac Taylor, John Borland, Robert Car, Abraham Wayn, John Hampton, Daniel Cook, James Cook.

 

LAND-OWNERS, 1774.

 

Andrew Steel, Anthony Wayne, James Scott, Joseph Gilbert, Lewis Morris, John Morris, James Morris, Whitehead Wetherby, Samuel Vanleer, Thomas McKean, Robert Stephen, Robert McGoogin, David Rees, William Hunter, John Steel, Frederick Landes, Morris Morris, Benjamin Junkin, Thomas Tucker, Evan Evans, William Griffith,

 

174 - HISTORY OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

 

Philip Sheaff, Thomas Moore, Jonathan Moore, Martha Davis, William Melchior, Henry Fox, John Llewellyn, Michael Binger, Casper White, Abel Hammer, Thomas Williams, Peter Uble, John Butler, Griffith Williams, David Morgan, Margaret Bell, Nathan Lewis, Thomas Welch, Joseph Massey, Thomas Massey, Ann Ellis, Abraham Davis.

 

JULIUS F. A. SACHSE.

 

The name given by Mr. Sachse to his place of sixty acres is " Sachsenstein," so called after the old family-seat in Germany, near Erfurt, the ruins of which still exist. He erected his residence in 1872 as a summer retreat, but in 1877 made it his permanent residence. His place is situated in Easttown township, in the western part thereof, near the Leopard, and about one and a half miles from Berwyn Station on the Pennsylvania Railroad. It is located in a neighborhood around which cluster rich historic associations of the Revolutionary war, and is but a short distance from Paoli, the scene of the British massacre of Sept. 20, 1777. His residence is a most beautiful one, and its surroundings tasteful and elegant, showing the taste of its proprietor, who in horticulture is a mastermind. He is a merchant, doing business in Philadelphia, but gives much attention and time to his elegant homestead in constant improvements to its comfort and beauty. His land is in two tracts, one of forty-nine acres, the other of ten acres and six perches. The former was a part of' a five-thousand-acre tract sold by William Penn in England, before he first came to America (7th month 13, 1681 0. S.), to James Claypoole, and to whom he made a deed, 12th month 17, 1684, for ten hundred and fifty acres. Claypoole's executors sold part of it to Adam Roades, whose executors conveyed sixty-nine acres to Anthony Wayne; his estate conveyed same to Benjamin Weatherby, whose executors sold it to Andrew Steele, who conveyed fifty-one acres thereof to John Evans, from whom it descended to his brother, Thomas B., thence, by will, to Hannah M. E. Kaufman, of whose executors Mr. Sachse purchased forty-nine acres, April 1, 1875. The other tract came down through Lydia Ellis, Lydia Minshall, Thomas Henderson, Benjamin Weatherby, Mary Norris, John Dickinson, William Smith, David Jones (the famous Baptist preacher of Revolutionary memory), Horatio Gates Jones, Ann W. Haley, John P. Lewis, of whose executors Mr. Sachse bought it Aug. 26, 1872.

 

EDGMONT.

 

TAXABLES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF 1715.

 

John Worrall, Joseph Baker, Philip Yarnold, John Worrilaw, Ephir: Jackson, Joseph Pennell, John Broomell, David Register, William Hiddings, John Golding, Rebecca Powell, John Gregory, Thomas Vernon, Thomas Dawson, Joseph Baker, Simon Acres, Edward Thompson, Jacob Taylor, John Clues, Nathan Evans, John Holdston, Caleb Thompson, William Willis, Robert Williamson, Evan Howell, William Adams, Richd Pritchard, Evan Lewis.

 

free Men.—William Clues, John Hiddings, William fflond.

 

Non-resident Land.—Bostock's land, John Kingman.

 

This township is now a part of Delaware County.

 

ELK.

 

This township was formed from East Nottingham in 1857, and received the name of Elk at the suggestion of Charles Ramsey. It is bounded on the east by Big Elk Creek, and Little Elk flows through it. Lewisville, in this township, was named in honor of Lewis J. Jones, who was

the first to build there. He was buried at Sharp's graveyard. His father, Nathan Jones, lived near, in the edge of Maryland.

 

FAGG'S MANOR.

 

About the year 1702 some surveys were made to the west of the London tract, as Londongrove was then called, for Letitia Penn and her brother William. This land, however, was so far beyond the regular settlements that nothing could be done towards selling it to actual settlers, and so it remained for many years. There were two tracts of 5000 acres each, although there is some evidence that Letitia's, which lay nearest to the London tract, contained at first 7175 acres. Her tract was called Fagg's Manor; in honor of Sir John Fagg, and the name has been handed down to the present time, being more particularly kept alive by the Presbyterian church, which is situated near the northwest corner of the manor.

 

After a time the land became exposed to the encroachments of irresponsible squatters, who destroyed the timber in order to raise a little grain, but made no great improvements. John Taylor notes in his memorandum-book that on the 3d of April, 1730, he " went and warned the Irish off Fagg's Manor." James Logan, as the attorney of Letitia Aubrey, appears to have had the oversight of her lands, and occasionly wrote to John Taylor concerning this tract. On the 16th of August, 1735, he wrote an order to the latter requesting him to survey in the manor for John Meas 200 acres, " more or less, as may best suit his conveniency (yet not exceeding 250), where he is now settling, to be held by him on his complyance with the terms of his said agreement with me, in behalf of the said Letitia."

 

The manor was resurveyed by warrant dated 5th of April, 1737, and a patent for the same signed by Thomas Penn on the 16th of May following. It was described as being near Marlborough township, in the county of Chester,—

 

Beginning at a white-oak at a corner of Wm. Penn's Manor [now the S. E. corner of W. Fallowfield] ; thence east 606 perches, part by vacant land and part by land of David Kennedy, to a post; thence South by vacant land 1400 perches to a marked tree, and West 606 perches to a white oak ; thence North by vacant lands, Israel Robinson's land, an I William Penn's Manor, 1400 perches to the beginning : containing 5000 acres and allowance of 6 per cent. for roads and highways.

 

There was a space nearly a mile and a quarter wide between this and the line of Londongrove, which at that time was mostly vacant. None of the old lines remain on our county map, except perhaps a part of the south line of Penn township.

 

The land in Fagg's Manor was divided among the settlers into many tracts, and the divisions numbered on a plan of the whole, but, with a few exceptions, the settlers did not pay for the land or get deeds for the same for several years after, and in the meanwhile the improvements passed from one owner to another, so that the deeds in many cases were not granted to the original settlers. Letitia Aubrey, by her will, dated July 20, 1744, devised her property in Pennsylvania to her nephew, William Penn (son of her brother William), and to his daughter, Christiana Gulielma Penn, after his death. This nephew, a grandson of the