50 - HISTORY OF OHIO by the Legislature in determining these matters. It would be in the interest of economy and prudence to restrict the Legislature in granting these acts of incorporation. Simeon Nash, legal writer and delegate from Gallia County, opposed the proposed change on the ground that under general laws corporations would multiply in the state. He said in part : Are gentlemen prepared to pass general laws for the organization of railroads whenever and wherever individuals may see fit ? By such legislation the state would divest itself of all authority over the location of these improvements, and railroad corporations would start up like mushrooms all over the state just as emulation between the different routes or the caprice and cupidity of the individuals might suggest. Such a course would jeopardize the income of all our public works, works which have cost the people millions, and would thus recklessly be exposed to destruction at the cravings of private cupidity. Is it right thus to surrender to individuals the power to thread our state with railroads, regardless of the public interests and wants ? Are you prepared to authorize the construction of railroads along the lines of the canals ? In this connection it is well to remember that our great manufacturing interests have developed since the adoption of our present constitution. In other lines the demands for corporate power have multiplied. It was fortunate that our constitution anticipated the needs of the future and prevented the continued extension of special chartered privileges to corporations. It was folly to expect, however, that the limitations prescribed would prove a panacea for existing ills or eliminate "log-rolling" and the activity of corporation agents about the halls of the General Assembly. Regulation by general laws has led to united action on the part of corporate interests, and it would be idle to expect this to be less effective than separate effort ; but uniform laws have promoted the general welfare by maintaining between the corporations themselves a degree of equality not otherwise possible. THE VETO POWER There was a spirited discussion of the proposal to give the governor the veto power. Rufus P. Ranney, one of the ablest delegates, recalled the experience with the veto under the ordinance of 1787 : "The people of the State of Ohio in their territorial government had a short experience of the veto power. Our fathers when they assembled and framed the constitution under which we have lived and prospered for upwards of fifty years, refused, to insert in that instrument the veto. They were nearly unanimous in the opinion that it ought not to be incorporated. This refusal to insert there such a provision met with the approbation of the people then, and from that time to the present it has met with the approbation of the people and I believe that the settled convictions of the people are against the incorporation of the veto power into the constitution." In stating his own attitude Mr. Ranney was direct and emphatic : "I shall vote against all vetoes, everywhere, in every form, and upon all occasions." Daniel A. Robertson, a delegate from Fairfield County argued ably for the veto. Reverting to the omission of this power from the constitution of 1802, he said : "Prior to the adoption of the present constitution, the governor of the territory was not elected by the people. He was appointed by a higher power in Washington, and his authority had frequently conflicted with that exercised by the territorial representatives of the people. The contest was protracted and waged with much bitterness of feeling, and this was the reason why the veto was omitted in the existing constitution ; and in Michigan, where the same feeling for the same cause existed, the veto power was also omitted in the constitution of that state. But CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OHIO - 51 shall we continue to be governed by this feeling now, when the occasion for it has passed away; and when we have been enlightened upon the subject by the experience of half a century ?" The venerable Judge Peter Hitchcock, delegate from Geauga County, opposed the proposed grant of power. Among other things he said : "It seems to me that the idea of giving to the governor a veto is inconsistent with our professions. It looks as though we distrusted the capabilities of the people for self-government. In fact, it is based upon the assumption that the people are incapable of self government. It implies also another fact, that we distrust our own qualifications to elect such men to do the business of the state as are worthy of being trusted. We are afraid to trust the legislative department of the government and therefore we put it under the care of the governor. * * * "They say the governor is the representative of the whole people, because the whole people have voted for him. He is the representative of the masses, and therefore he may with propriety interfere with the proceedings of the Legislature. But why not carry the reasoning out? If the governor be the representative of the whole people, and he alone knows the sentiments and wants of the people and can best provide for them, why not dispense with the Legislature and give the governor the power to make the laws ?" After much discussion, the effort to give the governor the veto power failed in the convention. LICENSE QUESTION The temperance question, although apparently but little discussed in the contest for delegates, loomed up prominently in the convention. Petitions were presented with thousands of signatures. Speeches on the subject occupy many pages of the second volume of the "Debates," but action was involved in parliamentary tangles and is at times difficult to trace, while the indexes are so inadequate that one must labor through many pages of the discussions and then feel that he has probably missed some important item in the record. The resolution embracing this subject was presented at all stages in practically the form in which it finally became a part of the constitution : "No license to traffic in intoxicating liquors shall hereafter be granted in this state ; but the General Assembly may by law provide against the evils resulting therefrom." It is practically impossible to learn the views of the many delegates, especially of the very large number that did not participate in the discussion. Charles Reemelin, an able delegate from Hamilton County, who seems to have opposed the resolution at all stages, but who nevertheless generally stated matters of fact with care, described the situation as follows : "The committee which drafted this report have reported it manifestly with the design to catch votes. The gentleman from Logan and the gentleman from Trumbull know that the temperance men in this body are as such in a miserable minority and that they could not obtain, directly and fairly, more than forty votes upon this floor. Many votes were, however, obtained for this report with the direct understanding that it proposed nothing more than to repeal all laws licensing the traffic and that hereafter it should be free. I myself know of as many as five members who voted for it with this understanding ; whilst at the same time, my friend from Logan and my friend from Guernsey voted for it for the purpose of preparing the way for future legislation on this subject and for declaring the selling of liquor to be a crime." The argument in favor of the resolution is here briefly presented by Benjamin Stanton, delegate from Logan County : "If two boys upon the streets raffle for a penny, they are liable to a 52 - HISTORY OF OHIO fine ; not on account of the enormity of the transaction, but because of its tendency to evil. So you fine an unlicensed person who sells a gill of whisky and for the same reason. But traffic in ardent spirits is the one indictable offense which has been authorized and sanctioned by statute. It is the only offense against public morals which particular individuals have been authorized to commit for a consideration. This is a monstrosity which ought not to be tolerated for a moment. The effect of it is to interpose a shield between the licensed rum seller and the efforts of the temperance reformer who is seeking to fix infamy and ignomy upon it. The friends of temperance ask that this may be taken away and that they may have an open field and a fair fight." The argument on the other side is thus presented by Henry Stanberry, delegate from Franklin and Delaware counties : "Gentlemen say that a license is a legal sanction, that it dignifies and gives respectability to the business of retailing and that the friends of the temperance reform are constantly met and confronted with the legal sanction of the evil which they are combating. That is putting the matter in a very plausible light. If indeed the evil only existed by reason of the license—if the license authorized that which would otherwise be unlawful, I could see the force of the objection. Hereafter when the license system is abolished, the business of retailing is to be a lawful business. It is still to have the sanction of law, a universal sanction instead of a partial and regulative sanction. "And then, sir, it is said under this free system the business will lose some of its respectability. No doubt of that. Under a system of free competition with no restraint, no local supervision, the business will, in a measure, fall into hands to which it would never be intrusted even under the worst administration of the license system." The votes on the resolution were close and there was much wavering and fence climbing. On February 24, 1851, it passed the convention by a vote of forty-five to thirty-nine and was ordered to be included as a part of the constitution. On the day following a wobbling member who had voted with the majority announced that he had received new light, that he was now sure that if this resolution were included the constitution would be defeated by the people at the polls. To avert that calamity he would move a reconsideration of the vote by which the resolution had been adopted. The motion was carried through the aid of new arrivals and one or two additional brethren who followed the author of the motion over the fence. The vote stood forty-seven to forty-five in favor of reconsideration. The resolution was then defeated, yeas, forty-three, nays, forty-nine, a complete reversal of the previous vote. This sudden change of front called forth from a delegate the following observation : We are pursuing in this matter about the usual course—at least the course the papers of the state say is the usual and every-day order of business here. They say that there is no telling when this convention will get through its business, for what it does one day it regularly undoes the next. This subject afterward came up as section 18 in the schedule and was adopted as a part of the constitution in the following form : “At the time when the votes of the electors shall be taken for the adoption or rejection of this constitution the additional section in the words following, to-wit : 'No license to traffic in intoxicating liquors shall hereafter be granted in this state ; but the General Assembly may by law provide against the evils resulting therefrom,' shall be separately submitted to the electors for adoption or rejection in the form following, to-wit : A separate ballot may be given by every elector and deposited in a separate box. Upon the ballots given for said separate amendment shall be written, or partly written and partly printed, the words, 'license to sell intoxicating liquors, yes ;' and upon the ballots given against said amendment in like manner the words, 'license to sell intoxicating liquors, no. If at the said election a majority of all the votes given for and CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OHIO - 53 against said amendments shall contain the words, 'license to sell intoxicating liquors, no,' then the said amendment shall be a separate section of Article IV of the constitution." The question of license was therefore submitted as a separate proposition. LIMITATION AND PAYMENT OF STATE DEBT One of the very important achievements of the convention was the approval of the provisions for the limitation of indebtedness that could be incurred by the state and the payment of the existing state debt that had been contracted chiefly in the construction of a system of canals. The working out of a plan to accomplish this fell to the committee on public debt and public works, of which William Hawkins of Morgan County was chairman. In submitting the report of the committee he explained that it was the purpose to fix the maximum beyond which the state could never hereafter contract any indebtedness at $750,000 and to create a sinking fund for the payment each year of the interest on the public debt and such part of the principle as would liquidate the existing indebtedness at the end of thirty years. In presenting the section for the payment of the state debt he said in part : "The great object of this plan is, without imposing any additional burden upon the people, to limit the time beyond which this debt shall not exist. The interest upon the debt of the state' for thirty years—which is the time fixed for its continuance—will amount to the sum of $28,800,000. Add together the interest and the principle, and it swells to $40,800,000—an immense sum to be drained from the industry of the people. By this process we save the sum of $10,300,000. Is this not an object worth attending to ? Public sentiment dictates that we shall fix a period when this debt shall be extinguished, and I want to bind the state against its perpetuation beyond a given period." The $10,300,000 referred to by the speaker was the amount that would be saved by the payment of interest and a part of the principal each year over what the state would pay at the end of thirty years if no payment had been made in the meantime. The plan presented by the chairman was adopted in principle. The state indebtedness was not liquidated at the end of thirty years, but the limitation for incurring additional indebtedness stood and still stands in the constitution. The state debt under the general plan proposed was gradually reduced and paid. This was really a beneficent and major achievement of the convention. If the people of Ohio had been able in the years following to devise a plan equally effective for tire payment and limitation of municipal indebtedness, it would have been most fortunate and salutary for the fiscal condition of the cities of the state. They would not now be burdened with debts, the interest charges on which requires the larger part of their revenues and in some instances threatens the municipality with bankruptcy. One is tempted to present a summary of the interesting discussions on taxation, especially the arguments on the taxation of church property, but space will not permit. Provision was made for biennial sessions of the General Assembly, but this provision was for years practically neutralized by biennial regular sessions and adjourned sessions, a practice which only in recent years has been abandoned. In the convention a number of able lawyers led in the reconstruction of the judicial system of the state, the chief reform originally demanded in the new constitution. It substituted for "a Supreme Court on wheels" a Supreme Court to sit at the state capital, as originally proposed in the constitutional convention of 1802, and provided that the judges should be chosen by popular vote. Provision was also made for the election of a number of state officers previously chosen by the General Assembly. 54 - HISTORY OF OHIO The dominant party in the convention gerrymandered the state in framing the legislative districts, and this led some of the minority to vote against adopting the constitution in the convention. The method of amending the constitution was materially changed. Under the constitution of 1802 this could be done only in a convention called for that purpose. Under the constitution of 1851 the General Assembly was authorized to submit amendments directly to the people for approval. This was intended to facilitate amendment of the constitution. It will be seen later why this change failed in large measure to accomplish its purpose. On July 9, 1850, the convention adjourned, because of the cholera epidemic, and met in Cincinnati, December 2, where it continued its labors until March 10, 1851. The new constitution was submitted to the people at special election June 17, 1851, and was adopted by a vote of 125,564 to 109,276, a majority of 16,288. The proposition to prohibit the license of the sale of intoxicating liquors carried by a vote of 113,237 to 104,255, a majority of 8,982. If the license proposal had not been thus submitted, it is more than probable, for very obvious reasons, that the constitution would have been voted down. CHAPTER V MEN OF THE SECOND CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF OHIO To the student of the development of state institutions the membership of state constitutional conventions is increasingly interesting with the passing of the years. On succeeding pages are presented brief biographical sketches of the delegates to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio who rendered conspicuous public service in other fields. In order that the name of no delegate shall be omitted in this brief survey, there is included at the close of this chapter the tabulated information in regard to each as published in the records of the convention. William Medill, president of the convention, was a man of ability and wide experience in the public service, who deserved well of his party and the state, who was in every way worthy of the honor conferred upon him by his fellow delegates. The convention created the office of lieutenant governor to which William Medill was chosen in the October election of 1851. He was not, as stated again and again by able writers and public speakers, "elected the first governor" under "the constitution that he had helped to frame." Reuben Wood was the first governor elected under the Second Constitution of Ohio. On July 13, 1853, he resigned to accept the post of United States Consul at Valparaiso, Chile, and was succeeded by Lieutenant Governor Medill, who was elected to succeed himself as governor at the October election of 1853. He served to January 14, 1856. Joseph Vance, delegate from Champaign County, had previously served as state legislator, congressman and governor. Henry Stanberry was attorney-general of the United States in the cabinet of Andrew Johnson. Samuel J. Kirkwood became governor of Iowa and represented that state in the United States Senate and the cabinet of James A. Garfield. Of the delegates to this convention twenty-two had been or afterward became members of Congress ; more than fifty previously or subsequently were members of the General Assembly of Ohio. Joseph R. Swan, Rufus P. Ranney, William Kennon, Sr., Josiah Scott and the venerable Peter Hitchcock were judges of the Supreme Court of Ohio. A goodly number served as judges of the lower courts and almost all of the delegates had been chosen to local positions of trust and responsibility. The roll of the convention with the nativity, residence, age and occupation of each delegate is suggestive of the varied talent and representative character of the men who revised and reconstructed the basic law of the state so well that it stood without material change for sixty years. When it is remembered that these years embraced the period of the Civil war and the social and industrial changes that followed it ; the rapid increase in population, the growth of large cities, the extension of commerce, the development and transforming influence of diversified manufacturing industries and the new problems that this material progress inevitably brought, high praise must be accorded to the ability, foresight, courage and fidelity of the delegates who submitted to the people of Ohio the constitution of 1851. Their achievement entitles them to an - 55 - 56 - HISTORY OF OHIO honored place in the annals of the state, whose progressive course they charted and prescribed in the basic law through more than half a century. MEMBERS OF THE SECOND OHIO CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION WHO HAD BEEN OR BECAME MEMBERS OF CONGRESS SHERLOCK J. ANDREWS Sherlock J. Andrews was born in Wallingford, Connecticut, in 1801 ; was graduated from Union College in 1821 ; studied law and was admitted to the bar ; came to Cleveland, Ohio, and began the practice of law in 1825 ; elected as a whig to the twenty-seventh Congress (March 4, 1841—March 3, 1843) ; declined renomination because of poor health ; judge of the Superior Court of Cleveland, 1848; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; delegate to the Third Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; first president of Cleveland Bar Association, 1873 ; first president of Cleveland Library Board, 1878; died February 11, 1880. DAVID CHAMBERS David Chambers was born in Allentown, Pennsylvania, March 17, 1780 ; in the whiskey insurrection was a confidential rider for President Washington ; learned the art of printing ; moved to Zanesville, Ohio, where he established a newspaper and was elected state printer ; secretary of the Ohio Senate ; volunteer aid-de-camp to Gen. Lewis Cass in the War of 1812; served as recorder and mayor of Zanesville ; elected to the Seventeenth Congress (March 4, 1821—March 3, 1823) ; member of the Ohio House of Representatives, 1814, 1828, 1836-1838, 18411842 ; delegate to Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; died in Zanesville, Ohio, August 8, 1864. JOHN CHANEY John Chaney was born in Washington County, Maryland, January 12, 1790 ; attended the common schools ; moved to Ohio ; Jackson Presidential elector in 1832 ; state representative, 1828-1830, 1842 ; elected as a Jackson democrat to the Twenty-third, Twenty-fourth and Twenty-fifth Congresses (March 4, 1833—March 3, 1839) ; returned to Canal Winchester, Ohio ; was a member of the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio, serving in place of Daniel A. Robertson, resigned ; member of village council ; died in Canal Winchester, Ohio, April 10, 1881. WILLIAM P. CUTLER William P. Cutler was born in Marietta, Ohio, July 12, 1812 ; attended public school and Ohio University ; state representative, 1844- 1847 ; served as speaker of the House of Representatives during his last term ; member of the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; president of the Marietta & Cincinnati Railroad, 1850-1860; elected as a republican to the Thirty-seventh Congress (March 4, 1861—March 3, 1863) ; died in Marietta, Ohio, April 11, 1889. ELIAS FLORENCE Elias Florence was born in Fauquier County, Virginia, February 15, 1797 ; attended the public schools ; engaged in agricultural pursuits ; moved to Ohio, locating in Circleville, Pickaway County ; state representative in 1829, 1830, 1834 and 1840 ; state senator, 1835-1836 ; elected as a whig to Twenty-eighth Congress ( March 4, 1843—March 3, 1845) ; CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OHIO - 57 member of the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; died in Muhlenberg Township, Pickaway County, Ohio, November 21, 1880. WILLIAM S. GROESBECK William S. Groesbeck was born in New York City, July 24, 1816 ; was graduated from Miami University in 1835 ; was admitted to the bar and began the practice of law in Cincinnati, Ohio ; member of the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; commissioner to codify the laws of Ohio in 1862; elected as a democrat to the Thirty-fifth Congress (March 4, 1857—March 3, 1859) ; member of the peace conference in 1851 ; served in the State Senate 1862-1864; delegate to the Union National Convention in Philadelphia in 1866 ; one of President Johnson's counsel in his impeachment trial in 1868 ; delegate to the international monetary conference in Paris, France, in 1878; died in Cincinnati, Ohio, July 7, 1897. CORNELIUS S. HAMILTON Cornelius S. Hamilton was born in Muskingum County, Ohio, January 2, 1821 ; attended the common school and Granville (Ohio) College; moved to Union County in 1839 ; studied law and was admitted to the bar ; engaged in farming and banking in connection with the practice of law ; appointed land appraiser and assessor in 1845 ; member of the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio; member of the State Senate, 1856-1857; editor and proprietor of the Marysville Tribune ; appointed by President Lincoln assessor of the Eighth Congressional District of Ohio ; elected as a republican to the Fortieth Congress, and served from March 4, 1867, to December 22, when his promising career ended in a tragedy. He lost his life at the hands of a son who had become violently insane. AARON HARLAN Aaron Harlan was born in Warren County, Ohio, September 8, 1802 ; attended the public schools ; studied law, was admitted to the bar and began practice in Xenia, Ohio, in 1825 ; state representative, 18321833, 1860 ; member of the State Senate, 1838-1839 and 1849 ; moved to Yellow Springs, Ohio, in 1841 ; Presidential elector on the Polk and Dallas ticket in 1844; member of the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; elected as a whig to the Thirty-third, Thirty-fourth and Thirty-fifth Congresses (March 4, 1853—March 3, 1859) ; moved to San Francisco, California, in 1864 ; died in San Francisco, California, January 8, 1868. PETER HITCHCOCK Peter Hitchcock was born in Cheshire, Connecticut, October 19, 1781 ; pursued classical studies and was graduated from Yale College in 1801 ; studied law, was admitted to the bar in 1804, and began practice in Cheshire ; moved to Geauga County, Ohio, in 1806 ; state representative in 1810 and state senator, 1812-1816, one term he served as president of the Senate; elected to the Fifteenth Congress (March 4, 1817—March 3, 1819) ; judge of the Supreme Court of Ohio, 1824-1852; a portion of that time he was chief justice ; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; died in Painesville, Ohio, March 4, 1854 ; buried at Burton, Ohio. VALENTINE BAXTER HORTON Valentine Baxter Horton was born in Windsor, Vermont, January 29, 1802; attended the Partridge Military School and afterwards became 58 - HISTORY OF OHIO one of its tutors ; studied law in Middletown, Connecticut, and in 1830 was admitted to the bar; moved to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where he began practice; moved to Cincinnati, Ohio, in 1833, and in 1835 moved to Pomeroy, Ohio, where he engaged in manufacturing; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; elected to the Thirty-fourth and Thirty-fifth Congresses (March 4, 1855-March 3, 1859) ; reelected to the Thirty-seventh Congress (March 4, 1861-March 3, 1863) ; died in Pomeroy, Ohio, January 14, 1888. JOHN JOHNSON John Johnson was born in the County of Tyrone, Ireland, in 1808; attended the public schools ; came to Coshocton, Ohio, in 1824 and engaged in agricultural pursuits ; elected to the State Senate, 1842-1843 ; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; elected as an independent to the Thirty-second Congress (March 4, 1851-March 3, 1853) ; engaged in banking until his death in Coshocton, Ohio, February 5, 1867. WILLIAM KENNON, SR. William Kennon, Sr., was born in Fayette County, Pennsylvania, May 15, 1793 ; attended the common schools ; moved to a farm near Barnesville, Ohio, in 1804 ; attended Franklin College two years ; studied law with William B. Hubbard in St. Clairsville and was admitted to the bar in 1824; elected as a democrat to the Twenty-first and Twenty-second Congresses (March 4, 1829-March 3, 1833) ; reelected to the Twenty-fourth Congress (March 4, 1835-March 3, 1837) ; elected common pleas judge, 1840; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; appointed by Governor Medill in 1854 to fill the unexpired term of William B. Caldwell as judge of the Supreme Court, and elected to succeed himself ; resigned in 1856 to resume the practice of law in St. Clairsville; at the outbreak of the Civil war Judge Kennon joined the republican party and was affiliated with it through his remaining years; died November 2, 1881. SAMUEL JORDAN KIRKWOOD Samuel Jordan Kirkwood was born in Hartford County, Maryland, December 20, 1813; attended the common schools and the academy of John McLeod in Washington, District of Columbia; moved to Richland County, Ohio, in 1835; studied law and was. admitted to the bar in 1843; prosecuting attorney of Richland County, 1845-1849 ; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; moved to Johnson County, Iowa, in 1855 ; elected to the State Senate in 1856; elected governor of Iowa in 1859; reelected in 1861 ; appointed by President Lincoln minister to Denmark, March 7, 1863, but declined the appointment ; elected as a republican to the United States Senate to fill vacancy caused by the resignation of James Harlan and served from January 13, 1866, to March 3, 1867; reelected to the United States Senate and served from March 4, 1877, to March 7, 1881, when he resigned ; secretary of the interior in President Garfield's cabinet, March 5, 1881, and served until April 6, 1882, when he resigned; died in Iowa City, Iowa, February 1, 1894. WILLIAM LAWRENCE William Lawrence was born in Washington, Ohio, September 2, 1814; was graduated from Jefferson College, Pennsylvania, in 1835; farmer and merchant ; state representative in 1843 ; Presidential elector on the democratic ticket in 1848; delegate to the Second Constitutional CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OHIO - 59 Convention of Ohio ; state senator, 1854-1857; elected as a democrat to the Thirty-fifth Congress (March 4, 1857—March 3, 1859) ; again state senator in 1868-1869 and 1886-1887; member of board of directors of Ohio Penitentiary and president of the board ; died in Washington, Ohio, September 8, 1895. DANIEL PARKHURST LEADBETTER Daniel Parkhurst Leadbetter was born in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, September 10, 1797 ; moved to Ohio in 1816 ; first located in Jefferson. County, where he studied law and was admitted to the bar in 1821; commissioned captain of militia in 1821; moved to Holmes County, where he was county recorder, 1831-1836; elected as a Van Buren democrat to the Twenty-fifth and Twenty-sixth Congresses (March 4, 1837—March 3, 1841); member of the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; died in Millersburg, Ohio, February 26, 1870. SAMSON MASON Samson Mason was born in Fort Ann, New York, July 24, 1793 ; attended the common schools in Onondaga, New York; studied law, was admitted to the bar and commenced practice in Springfield, Ohio, in 1819 ; prosecuting attorney for Clark County in 1822 ; member of the State Senate, 1829-1831; candidate for Presidential elector in 1832 ; elected as a whig to the Twenty-fourth, Twenty-fifth, Twenty-sixth and Twenty-seventh Congresses (March 4, 1835—March 3, 1843) ; state representative, 1823, 1845-1846; appointed by President Fillmore United States attorney for Ohio ; member of the State Senate, 1862- 1863 ; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio; served as captain, brigadier general, and major general in the state militia; died in Springfield, Ohio, February 1, 1869. WILLIAM MEDILL William Medill was born in Newcastle County, Delaware, in 1805 ; was graduated from Delaware College in 1825 ; studied law, was admitted to the bar and commenced practice in Lancaster, Ohio, in 1832 ; state representative, 1835-1837, serving as speaker, 1836-1837; elected as a democrat to the Twenty-sixth and Twenty-seventh Congresses (March 4, 1839—March 3, 1843) ; appointed by President Polk second assistant postmaster general in 1845 ; commissioner of Indian affairs, October 28, 1845—May 29, 1849 ; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio, and its president ; lieutenant governor of Ohio, 1852-1853; governor of Ohio, 1853-1856; defeated for reelection; first comptroller of the United States Treasury by appointment of President Buchanan, March 26, 1857—April 10, 1861; died in Lancaster, Ohio, September 2, 1865. WILLIAM SAWYER William Sawyer was born in Montgomery County, Ohio, August 5, 1803; when fifteen years old he was apprenticed to a blacksmith; worked at his trade at Dayton and at the Indian agency near Grand Rapids, Michigan ; in 1829 moved to Miamisburg, Ohio ; state representative, 1832-1835, speaker of the House in 1835; unsuccessful candidate for Congress in 1838 and 1840 ; moved to Saint Mary's, Ohio, in 1843 ; elected to Congress in 1844 and 1846, serving March 4, 1845—March 3, 1849; delegate to Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; state representative in 1856; receiver of land office of Otter Trail District, Minnesota, by Presidential appointment, 1855-1861; appointed by Governor Hayes trustee of the Ohio Agricultural and Mechanical College in 1869; mayor and justice of the peace of Saint Mary's during the last seven years of his life; died September 18, 1877. 60 - HISTORY OF OHIO BENJAMIN STANTON Benjamin Stanton was born in Mount Pleasant, Jefferson County, Ohio, June 4, 1809 ; studied law, admitted to the bar and in 1834 began practice at Belief ontaine, Ohio ; member of the State Senate, 1841-1842; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; elected as a whig to the Thirty-second Congress (March 4, 1851—March 3, 1853) ; reelected to the Thirty-fourth, Thirty-fifth and Thirty-sixth Congresses (March 4, 1855—March 3, 1861) ; lieutenant governor of Ohio in 1862 ; moved to Wheeling, West Virginia, and resumed the practice of law ; died in Wheeling, West Virginia, June 2, 1872. JOHN ARMSTRONG SMITH John Armstrong Smith was born in Hillsboro, Ohio, September 23, 1814; pursued classical studies and was graduated from Miami University in 1834 ; studied law and was admitted to the bar ; state representative, 1842 ; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; elected as a republican to the Forty-first and Forty-second Congresses (March 4, 1869—March 3, 1873) ; resumed the practice of law ; delegate to the Third Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; died in Hillsboro, Ohio, March 7, 1892. NORTON STRANGE TOWNSHEND Norton Strange Townshend was born in Clay-Coaton, Northamptonshire, England, December 25, 1815 ; came to the United States with his parents in 1830 and settled at Avon, Ohio ; educated himself by the use of his father's library; taught district school ; studied medicine and was graduated from the University of Physicians and Surgeons in New York in 1840 ; delegate to the World's Anti-Slavery Convention in London, England, in 1840; studied in the hospitals of London, Paris, Edinburgh and Dublin ; returned to Ohio and resumed the practice of medicine in Avon in 1841; moved to Elyria, Ohio ; state representative in 1848; state senator, 1854-1855; delegate to Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; elected as democrat to Thirty-second Congress (March 4, 1851—March 3,1853) ; abandoned the medical profession and engaged in farming near Avon; member of state board of agriculture, 1858-1863, 1868-1869 ; medical inspector, United States Army, with the rank of lieutenant colonel, 1863-1865 ; professor of agriculture in Iowa Agricultural College in 1869 ; prof essor of agriculture in Agricultural and Mechanical College of Ohio (now Ohio State University), 1873-1892, during which time he visited the agricultural and veterinary schools and botanical gardens of Great Britain and Ireland ; attended the national fairs at Shrewsbury, Edinburg and Ireland ; died in Columbus, Ohio, July 13, 1895 ; buried at Avon Center, Lorain County, Ohio. JOSEPH VANCE Joseph Vance was born in Washington County, Pennsylvania, March 21, 1786 ; moved with his father to Kentucky in 1788 ; thence to Urbana, Ohio ; captain of a rifle company in 1809 ; state representative, 1812-1813, 1815-1816, 1819-1820 ; engaged in mercantile business in Urbana and Perrysburg, Ohio ; laid out the City of Findlay ; elected as a democrat to the Eighteenth and the five succeeding Congresses (March 4, 1823—March 3, 1835) ; governor of Ohio, 1836-1838 ; defeated for reelection ; reelected as a whig to the Twenty-eighth and Twenty-ninth Congresses (March 4, 1843—March 3, 1847) ; delegate to the whig national convention in 1848; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; died near Urbana, Ohio, August 24, 1852. CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OHIO - 61 EMINENT JURISTS OF THE SECOND CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF OHIO RUFUS P. RANNEY Rufus P. Ranney was born at Blanford, Hampden County, Massachusetts, October 30, 1813. In 1822 he came with his father's family to Portage County, Ohio ; attended Western Reserve College; at the age of twenty-two years entered the law office of Joshua R. Giddings and Benjamin F. Wade to study law ; admitted to the bar in 1836; entered into partnership with Wade when Giddings was elected to Congress ; in 1845 moved to Warren, Ohio, and practiced law ; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; chosen judge of the Supreme Court of Ohio by the General Assembly March 17, 1851; elected by the people under the new constitution and succeeded himself, February 9, 1852, serving to February 15, 1857 ; nominated for governor in 1859, but defeated by Dennison; moved to Cleveland and resumed the practice of law; again elected judge of the Supreme Court and served from February 9, 1863, to February 23, 1865, when he resigned and returned to Cleveland, where he continued his law practice ; was chosen first president of the Ohio Bar Association in 1881; died in Cleveland, Ohio, December. 6, 1891. JOSIAH SCOTT Josiah Scott was born in Washington County, Pennsylvania, December 1, 1803 ; was graduated with highest honors from Jefferson College, Pennsylvania, in 1823 ; taught classical school at Newton, Pennsylvania ; taught school in Richmond, Virginia ; returned to Pennsylvania and was tutor in Jefferson College ; studied law while he was teaching ; came to Mansfield, Ohio, in the spring of 1829 ; in June of that year began the practice of law in Bucyrus, Ohio ; state representative, ,1840 ; moved to Hamilton, Ohio ; delegate to Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; judge of the Supreme Court, February 15, 1857—February 9, 1872 ; member of the Supreme Court Commission, 1876-1879; died June 15, 1879. HENRY STANBERY Henry Stanbery was born in New York City, February 20, 1803, the son of Joseph Stanbery, a physician, who moved to Zanesville, Ohio, in 1814. Henry was graduated from Washington College, Pennsylvania, in 1819, studied law and was admitted to the bar in 1824 ; practiced with Thomas Ewing in Lancaster, Ohio ; attorney-general of Ohio, 18461850 ; delegate to Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; moved to Cincinnati in 1853 ; appointed attorney-general of the United States by President Andrew Johnson in 1866 ; resigned to become the counsel for. President Johnson at his impeachment trial ; nominated by President Johnson as justice of the United States Supreme Court, but not confirmed by the United States Senate ; died in Cincinnati, June 26, 1881. JOSEPH ROCKWELL SWAN Joseph Rockwell Swan was born at Westernville, New York, December 28, 1802 ; moved with parents to Aurora, New York, where he received his early education ; entered law office of his uncle, Gustavus Swan, in Columbus, Ohio, where he studied until admitted to the bar ; elected prosecuting attorney of Franklin County in 1830 ; elected common pleas judge in 1843 and resigned in 1845 ; delegate to Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; elected judge of the Supreme Court of Ohio in 1854 and served to 1860 ; rendered decision sustaining the United States fugitive slave law and was refused renomination by the republican party; many prominent men in that party, including Abraham Lincoln, 62 - HISTORY OF OHIO condemned this action of the party ; afterward tendered position on Supreme Bench, but twice declined ; interested in building of railroads and for a time president of the Columbus & Xenia Railroad ; author of a number of legal works, including "Swan's Pleadings and Practice"; died in Columbus, Ohio, December 8, 1884. SOME WRITERS OF THE SECOND CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF OHIO OTWAY CURRY Otway Curry was born March 26, 1804, on the site of what is now Greenfield, Highland County, Ohio ; son of Col. James Curry, an officer in the Revolution and state representative of Ohio in 1812 ; came to what is now Union County in 1811 ; received good common school education ; learned the carpenter trade and worked for a short time in Cincinnati, Ohio, Detroit, Michigan and Marion, Ohio ; built a canoe and with a friend went down the Scioto, Ohio and Mississippi rivers to Port Gibson, where he spent a year ; developed a fondness for literature and early composed poems which were published in Cincinnati papers ; returned to his father's home in 1828 and married ; engaged in farming ; state representative, 1836-1837, 1842 ; moved to Xenia and published the Greene County Torchlight ; returned to Marysville, Ohio ; associated with William D. Gallagher in the publication of the Hesperian, a literary monthly magazine of high grade that ran through three volumes and suspended ; studied law and was admitted to the bar ; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; purchased and edited for one year (1853) the Scioto Gazette at Chillicothe ; returned to Marysville and resumed the practice of the law ; died February 15, 1855. Otway Curry, in his contributions to the early literature of Ohio, easily surpassed any of his fellow members of the constitutional convention. His poem, "The Lost Pleiad," which was published in an edition of McGuffy's Sixth Reader in the later '60s, is sublime in conception, dignified in execution and ranks with the classics. He wrote other poems of merit and prose sketches that were much admired. JAMES W. TAYLOR James W. Taylor was born at Penn Yen, Yates County, New York, in 1819 ; was graduated from Hamilton College in 1839 ; practiced law; moved to Ohio in 1841 ; edited tile Cincinnati Signal in 1847 ; moved to Sandusky, Ohio, and edited the Democratic Mirror ; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio ; state librarian of Ohio, 1854-1856 ; moved to Minnesota ; in Civil war time and for years afterward was special agent of the United States Treasury charged with investigation of trade relations with Canada ; in 1870 appointed by President Grant United States Consul at Winnipeg, Canada. He was author of books, monographs and reports. Among these were : "History of the State of Ohio, First Period, 1620-1787" (1854) ; "Manual of the Ohio School System" (1857) ; "Alleghenia, or the Strength of the Union and the Weakness of Slavery in the High Lands of the South" (1862) ; "Forest and Fruit Culture in Manitoba" (1882). With John R. Brown he wrote "Mineral Resources of the United States" (1867). Among his other publications and reports were : "The Railroad System of Minnesota and Northwestern Connections" (1859) ; reports to the United States Treasury Department on "Commercial Relations With Canada" (1860, 1862, 1868). During his long services as consul at Winnipeg he greatly endeared himself to the people of that city and the entire Province of Manitoba. Though a citizen of the United States, he entered whole-heartedly and unselfishly into every movement for the upbuilding of the capital of the province and saw it rise from a mere CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OHIO - 63 frontier post to a prosperous and flourishing municipality of the Dominion. In the City Hall a large oil portrait attracts the attention of the visitor and attests that Winnipeg holds in grateful memory the personality and services of James W. Taylor. He died in that city while still holding the office of consul, April 28, 1803. SIMEON NASH Simeon Nash was born in Massachusetts in 1800; came to Ohio in 1832; state senator, 1839-1842; delegate to the Second Constitutional Convention of Ohio; judge of the Court of Common Pleas, 1852-1862; resident of Gallia County, Ohio; author of “Nash’s Pleadings”; “Digest of Ohio Reports”; “Morality and the State”; “Crime and the Family.” MEMBERS AND OFFICERS OF THE SECOND OHIO CONVENTION HON. WM. MEDILL, President - W. H. GILL, Secretary - J. V. SMITH, Reporter |
Names of Delegates and Officers |
From what County |
Post Office |
Place of Nativity |
Ye-ars in the State |
Age |
Occupation |
Married Or Single |
Andrews, S. J. Archbold, Edward Barbee, William Barnet, Joseph Barnett, David Bates, William S. Bennett, Alden I. Blair, John H. Blickensderfer, Jacob Brown, A. G. Brown, Van Cahill, Richard W. Case, F. Case, L. Chambers, David *Chaney, John Clark, H. D. Collings, George Cook, Friend Curry, Otway Cutler, Wm. P. Dorsey, G. Volncy Ewart, Thomas W. |
Cuyahoga Monroe Miami Montgomery Preble Jefferson Tuscarawas
Brown Tuscarawas Athens Carroll Crawford Hocking Licking Muskingum Fairfield Lorain Adams Portage Union Washington
Miami Washington |
Cleveland Woodsfield
Troy Dayton
Camden
Smithfield
Bolivar
Georgetown
Canal Dover
Athens
Carrollton
Liberty Corners Logan Newark
Zanesville
Carroll Elyria West Union
Atwater
Marysville
Constitution
Piqua Marietta |
Connecticut
Washington,DC
Kentucky
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Virginia New York
Tennessee
Pennsylvania Ohio Virginia Pennsylvania
Connecticut
Connecticut
Pennsylvania
Maryland
Connecticut
Ohio
Connecticut Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio |
24 20 45 19 46
23
19
40
38
52
38 30
13
15
40
40
18
50
13
43
37
37
34 |
48 40 61 66 49 44 43 57 60 52 48 45
32
37
69
61
44
50
52
43
37
37
34 |
Lawyer Lawyer Merchant Farmer Miller Physician Physician Farmer Farmer Lawyer Lawyer Farmer Lawyer Lawyer Farmer Law. / Farmer Law. / Farmer Lawyer Physician Lawyer Farmer Physician Clerk of Court |
Married Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married |
64 - HISTORY OF OHIO MEMBERS AND OFFICERS OF THE SECOND OHIO CONVENTION- Continued |
|||||||
Ewing, John Farr, Joseph M. Florence, Elias Forbes, Robert Gillett, H. N. Graham, John Gray, H. C. Greene, Jacob J. Green, John L. Gregg, Henry H. Groesbeck, W. S . Hamilton, C. S Hard, D. D. T Harlan, A. Hawkins, William Henderson, James P. Hitchcock, Reuben Hitchcock, Peter Holmes, G. W. Holt, George B. Hootman, John J. Horton, V. B. Humphreyville, S. Hunt, John E. Hunter, B. B. Johnson, John |
Hancock Huron Pickaway Mahoning Lawrence Franklin Lake Defiance Ross Columbiana Hamilton Union Jackson Greene Morgan Richland Cuyahoga
Geauga
Hamilton
Montgomery Ashland Meigs Medina Lucas Ashtabula Coshocton |
Findlay Norwalk Darbyville Petersburg Quakerbottom Columbus Painesville Defiance Chillicothe
New Lisbon
Cincinnati
Marysville
Reed 's Mill
Yellow
Springs
McConnelsville
Newville
Cleveland Burton
Cincinnati
Dayton
Jeromeville
Pomeroy
MedinaC.H.
Maumee City.
Austinburgh
Coshocton |
Pennsylvania
New York
Virginia
Pennsylvania
Connecticut
Virginia Pennsylvania
Ohio Virginia
Virginia New York Ohio Ohio Ohio Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Ohio
Connecticut
Ohio
Connecticut
Pennsylvania
Vermont Massachusetts Ohio New York
Ireland |
16 15 44 32 33
27
13
29
22
15
31
29
32 47 40
20
43
44
44
30
23
17 18 52 16 |
44
39
52
57
51
38
33
29
44
40
34
29
32 47 53
47
43
68 44 59 35 47 42 52 40 43 |
Merchant
Printer Farmer Farmer Farmer
Surveyor
Editor /Printer
Editor Lawyer Printer/Drug.
Lawyer Editor
Merchant Farmer Miscellaneous
Physician Lawyer Lawyer Lum/Merchant Law. / Farmer Blacksmith Lawyer Lawyer Merchant County/ Surv. Farmer |
Married
Married
Married
Married
Single
Married
Married
Single
Married
Married
Married
Married Married Married Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married Married
Married
Married |
CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OHIO - 65 |
|||||||
Jones, J. Dan Kennon, William
King, James B.
Kirkwood, S. J.
Larsh, Thomas J.
Lawrence, William
Larwill, John Leech, Robert Leadbetter, D. P.
Loudon, James
Lidey, John Manon, H. S.
Mitchell, M. H.
Mason, Samson
Morehead, Samuel Morris, Isaiah
McCloud, Charles
McCormick, J.
Nash, Simeon Norris, S. F. Orton, C. J. Otis, William S. Patterson, Thomas
Peck, Daniel Perkins, Jacob
Quigley, Samuel
Ranney, R. P.
Reemelin, Charles
Riddle, A. N. |
Hamilton
Belmont
Butler
Richland
Preble
Guernsey
Wayne
Guernsey
Holmes
Brown Perry Licking Knox Clark
Harrison
Clinton
Madison
Adams Gallia
Clermont
Sandusky
Summit
Highland
Belmont
Trumbull
Columbiana
Trumbull
Hamilton Hamilton |
MadisonvillClairsville
Reily
Mansfield
Eaton
Washington
Wooster
Cambridge
Millersburg
Georgetown Somerset
Hebron Mt. Vernon
Springfield
Greene
Wilmington
W. Camden
West Union.
Gallipolis Batavia
Fremont
Akron
Hillsboroug
StClairsville
Warren
Calcutta
Warren
Dent
Cincinnati |
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Virginia
Maryland Ohio Ohio England
Pennsylvania
Massachusetts
Kentucky
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Ohio Ohio
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Vermont Ohio
Massachusetts
New Hampshir
New York
Massachusetts
Kentucky
Vermont Ohio
Pennsylvania
Massachusetts
Germany Ohio |
31
44
35
14
41
36
48
24
33
44
45
13
42
31
35
47
40
35
18
12
5 19
40
22
28
30
25
17 44 |
31
51
47
36
41
36
57
25
52
54
54
40
42
57
55
62 42 35 45 36 34 41
50
52
28 53
36
36
44 |
Farmer
Lawyer
Farmer
Lawyer
Surveyor
Merchant
Merchant Attorney at Law
Farmer Farmer
Farmer, &c Farmer
Lawyer
Lawyer
Farmer Farmer
Merchant
Lawyer
Lawyer
Lawyer Editor Lawyer
Farmer and Mfgr Lawyer
Farmer
Physician
Lawyer
Farmer Surveyor |
Single
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Single
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married |
66 - HISTORY OF OHIO |
|||||||
Roll, E. O. Sawyer, William Scott, Josiah Scott, Sabirt Sellers, John Smith, John A. Smith, G. J. Smith, B. P. Stanberry, Henry Stanton, Benjamin Stebbins, Albert V. Stilwell, Richard Stickney, E. T. Stidger, Harman Struble, James Swan J. R. Swift, L. Taylor, James W. Thompson, H. Thompson, Joseph Townshend,NortonS. Vance, Elijah Vance, Joseph Warren, W. M. Way, Thomas A. Williams, J. Milton Woodbury, E. B. t Wilson, E. + Worthington, James T. |
Hamilton
Auglaize
Harrison
Auglaize
Knox
Highland
Warren
Wyandot
Franklin
Logan Henry
Muskingum Seneca Stark
Hamilton
Franklin
Summit Erie Shelby Stark Lorain Butler
Champaign
Delaware
Monroe
Warren Ashtabula Wayne Ross |
Cincinnati
St. Marys.
Cadiz St. Marys
Utica
Hillsboroug
Lebanon
Carey
Columbus
Bellefontain
Damascus
Zanesville
Republic
Canton
Derbis
Columbus
Akron
Sandusky
Sidney N. Franklin
Elyria
Hamilton Urbana
Scioto Rid.
Graysville
Lebanon
Kelloggsville Jeromeville Chillicothe |
Ohio Ohio
Pennsylvania
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Ohio Ohio Georgia New York Ohio
Connecticut
Pennsylvania
New York
Pennsylvania
New Jersey
New York
Connecticut
New York
Pennsylvania
Virginia
England
Maryland Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Maryland Ohio N. Hampshire
Ohio Ohio |
34
45
40
38
25
35
50
26
36
40
31
43
14
40
37
32
14
8
19
46
20
32
50
39
19
41
38
49 48 |
34
45
48
38
55
35
50
31
47
40
39
53
38
50
50
47
42
30
42
56
34
48 65 47 44 41 44 49 48 |
Lawyer
Blacksmith
Att. at Law
Farmer Farmer Att. at Law
Att. at Law
Att. at Law
Lawyer Lawyer
Farmer
Lawyer
Farmer Phy./ Farmer
Farmer
Lawyer
Farmer Editor Att. at Law
Farmer
Physician
Lawyer
Farmer Farmer Farmer Att. at Law
Att. at Law
Farmer Farmer |
Married
Married
Married
Single
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Single
Single
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married
Married Married |
CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OHIO - 67 |
|||||||
Medill, William,Pres Gill, W. H., Sec. Prentiss,W. S. V., A. Secty Mortley, David II., Asst. Secty Smith, J. V., Rep. Henry Reed, A. Rep. §Okev, H., Sergeant-at-Arms Arnold, James, Door Keeper |
Fairfield
Guernsey Knox Morgan
Hamilton
Franklin Monroe Richland |
Lancaster
Cambridge Mt. Vernon McConnelsv
Cincinnati
Columbus Woodsfield Mansfield |
Delaware
Pennsylvania Ohio England New York
Connecticut Delaware Pennsylvania |
18 16 23 15
3
14 50 44 |
48 24 23 30 23 31 55 53 |
Att. at Law Printer/ Editor Att. at Law Joiner Editor Editor Collector Carpenter |
Single
Married Married Married
Married
Married Single Married |
* In place of Daniel A. Robertson, resigned. t In place of Leander Firestone, resigned. + In place
of Wesley Claypool, resigned. § In place of John W. Carrolton, resigned. CHAPTER VI FROM THE CONSTITUTION OF 1851 TO THE CONSTITU- TIONAL CONVENTION OF 1873-1874 CONSTITUTION OF 1851 DIFFICULT TO AMEND In spite of the demonstrated defects and inadequacy of the constitution of 1802, the new
constitution, embracing the popular reforms of the day, was not carried by an overwhelming
majority. This attests a fact that has been evident throughout our state history ; when it comes to
the adoption of a state constitution the people of Ohio have been conservative. And we might
truly add that when amendments have been submitted the electors have been indifferent as well
as conservative. The attitude of the whips and democrats toward the constitution of 1851 is fairly set forth in the
editorials of the leading organs of the two parties just before its adoption. On the day before the
special election, June 16, 1851, the Ohio State Journal thus presented the whig view : "For the last three months the merits and demerits of that instrument [the constitution] have been
discussed through the columns of the Journal. The friends as well as the foes of it have had free
use of our columns. We have regarded the subject, not in a partisan or sectarian view, but have
endeavored to place it on higher ground. If, in this view, its defects have appeared more
prominent than its merits, it is the misfortune of those who have exercised their skill in its
formation. "That there are merits in the new constitution has been admitted from the beginning. The election
of officers by the people, the facility for adapting the judiciary to the increased wants of the state,
the clause for future amendment are all proper and fit to be made. The other side of the case we
have from time to time presented. The violation of the faith of the state about taxing state bonds ;
the clauses that will limit, if not destroy, all internal improvement ; the infamous apportionment
and the rejection of the single district system—all make a formidable list of objections that can
hardly fail Ito have great weight with intelligent minds. "Let every citizen go to the polls and there deposit the deliberate conviction of his judgment,
unswayed by partisan feeling." The Ohio Statesman, in the following editorial, published about the same time, sets forth the
democratic attitude : "The new constitution is emphatically a liberal, progressive document. It secures the rule of
popular concerns from irresponsible and selfish interferences. It strikes a death blow at the
bloated arrogance of wealth and places the means of prosperity in the hands of labor. It puts the
hand of taxation into the pockets of all men and persons alike. No man can huddle his hundreds
of thousands into the coffers of a corporation and go on augmenting his fortune without paying
equally with the poor man for the support of the government under whose protection he enjoys
his property and grows rich. It sets bounds to existing corporations and imposes barriers to the
creation of all other new ones than those which the people from time to time decree. Where the
old constitution is vague, this is explicit and plain ; where the old is wanting this is complete;
where the old was capable of perversion to the detriment of popular welfare, this bristles with
popular protection. This is emphatically the 'People's Constitution.' " - 68 - CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OHIO - 69 To the changes brought about by the new constitution, the people gradually adjusted themselves
and it steadily grew in popular favor. It added to the strength of the democratic party; and Joseph
Medill, the president of the convention, was elected governor by a substantial majority. The
apportionment, as already noted, was made in the interest of that party, but it was destined soon
to lose the advantage of its gerrymander. New issues, national in their scope, arose above the
political horizon. The cloud, at first small and insignificant, grew. as it swept on, bearing in its
breast bolts of destruction for the whig party and for its opponent the scourge of defeat,
humiliation and long years of exile. The section providing for the amendment of the constitution required that proposed changes
should receive a three-fifths affirmative vote of both branches of the General Assembly, before
submission to the people. In order to become a part of the constitution, an amendment must
receive a majority of all the votes cast at such election. Of course; it might receive a majority of.
all the votes cast thereon, and at the same time not receive a majority of the total votes cast at the
election. The votes on the amendments submitted in 1857 will illustrate the practical working of
this section of the constitution. The vote on amendments to the constitution submitted at the October election of that year was as
follows : Total number of votes cast - 332,126 Affirmative vote necessary to carry any amendment - 166,064 |
Proposition No. 1. |
Annual sessions—Yes - 151,212 Annual sessions—No. - 31,899 Majority - 119,313 |
Proposition No. 2. |
Change of District courts—Yes - 156,646 Change of District courts—No - 30,039 Majority - 126,607 |
Proposition No. 3. |
Bank and individual taxation equal—Yes - 160,470 Bank and individual taxation equal—No - 20,600 Majority - 139,870 |
Proposition No. 4. |
Corporations—Yes - 123,229 Corporations—No - 35,973 Majority - 87,256 |
Proposition No. 5. |
Single districts—Yes - 147,260 Single districts—No - 32,657 Majority - 114,603 |
CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1873-1874 The election of delegates resulted in the choice of men of high average ability, a number of whom were, or afterward became prominent. Of the entire number, 105, sixty-one were lawyers, a fact that was seized upon and used with telling effect by the opponents of the constitution when it was submitted to popular vote. The convention opened with a more intelligent discussion of the oath to be taken by the members than that noted at the outset of the convention of 1850-1851. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice White, of the Supreme Court of the state, in the usual form, including the pledge to support the then existing constitution of Ohio. 70 - HISTORY OF OHIO A majority of the delegates were republicans, but the organization of the convention was effected without partisan controversy, and Mort rison R. Waite, of Toledo, was elected president on the fourth ballot. Before the convention concluded its labors the president resigned to accept the position of chief justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. The vacancy thus occasioned was filled January 28, 1874, by the election, on the fourth ballot, of Rufus King of Cincinnati. There was some controversy over the letting of printing contracts, but it did not, as in the previous convention, turn on the politics of the printer. The policy of competitive bidding, which was openly opposed by the dominant party in the convention of 1850-1851, seems to have grown quite popular in two decades. There was no objection whatever to it, and the only controversy arose over accepting the bid of a Cleveland firm but slightly lower than that of a Columbus establishment. It was argued, and with much show of reason, that the superior convenience arising from having the work done by a local printer would more than balance the difference in price. But the convention, by a substantial majority, literally kept its faith and voted to give the contract for publishing the "Debates" to W. S. Robinson & Company of Cleveland, the lowest responsible bidder. On May 20, the fifth clay of the convention, the chair announced the following standing committees : 1. On privileges and elections. 2. On preamble and bill of rights. 3. On the legislative department 4. On the executive department. 5. On the judicial department. 6. On the elective franchise. 7. On education. 8. On public institutions. 9. On public debt and public works. 10. On the militia. 11. On accounts and expenditures. 12. On county and township organizations. 13. On apportionment and representation. 14. On revenue and taxation. 15. On municipal corporations. 16. On corporations other than municipal. 17. On miscellaneous subjects. 18. On amendments. 19. On the schedule. 20. On traffic in intoxicating liquors. The "Official report of the proceedings and debates of the third constitutional convention of Ohio," published in two volumes, the second in three parts, contains a very complete and detailed record of all that was proposed and done. The volumes aggregate over 4,800 pages. One wishes that the work might have been more thoroughly indexed, for while it contains much that is now of little practical value, it also includes a great fund of able discussion of fundamental principles and problems of state government that are of current interest. To some of the more important of these, brief reference will be made on succeeding pages. ATTITUDE OF THE PARTIES TOWARD THE CONSTITUTION OF 1851 It will thus be seen that while each proposition received a majority of the votes cast thereon, no one received a constitutional majority of all the votes cast at the election. All of these amendments were defeated by the electors who refrained from voting on them. Some of them doubtless did this purposely, but most of them were negligent and indifferent. No doubt it was the purpose of those who framed this section CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OHIO - 71 to make it somewhat difficult to amend the constitution. The theory was that before a change should be made there ought to be such a popular demand for it that it would secure the support of a majority of all the votes cast at the regular election. In after years there was a growing conviction that this provision conceded too much to the ignorance and indifference of the electorate. EARLY ATTEMPTS AT AMENDMENT However this may be, it is certain that the practical inability to adopt amendments led the people in 1871 to vote for a convention "to revise, alter or amend" the constitution. The two decades from 1850 to 1870 had witnessed great changes in Ohio. The population had grown from 1,980,329 to 2,665,280, but in a much greater ratio had increased our corporate and industrial development. Vast aggregations of wealth had been invested in commerce and manufacturing. Railroad, telegraph and express companies were performing a great service for the people, reaping rich returns and gradually acquiring political influence of a dangerous character. Immediately after the close of the Civil war the enterprising spirit of the people turned to peaceful activities. Great manufacturing establishments sprang up and Ohio exemplified the declaration of the President of the United States that the "fires of productive industry were kindled at the funeral pyre of slavery." These changes magnified old problems of state government and brought forth new ones. Failure to adopt amendments to meet these new conditions led to the agitation for a constitutional convention, and when the question was submitted to the people in 1871 the proposition prevailed by the following vote : Whole number of votes cast at election - 459,990. Necessary to authorize calling of convention - 229,996 For the convention - 264,970 Against the convention - 104,231 PRELIMINARIES OF THIRD CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION It would be difficult to enumerate all the considerations that led the people to vote in favor of a convention. It was generally conceded that the judicial system again needed revision. In a public address, Gen. Thomas Ewing declared that the Supreme Court was four years in arrears with its work and that with all diligence on the part of the judges the law's delays were destined to become more vexatious and expensive. There was also a general feeling that there should be a more effective regulation of corporations. The eternal warfare between the temperance people and the liquor interests figured pretty largely in the vote for the convention. The anti-license advocates had won by a small majority when the constitution of 1851 was adopted. The friends of the license system were now eager for another test of strength and felt very sanguine that they would be able to vote their proposition into the constitution. Other questions of minor interest helped to bring about the result. Among these were the veto power of the governor, limitation of indebtedness for cities, a salary system for county officers and proportional representation on the Supreme Bench. CHAPTER VII CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1873-1874 EQUAL SUFFRAGE The subject of woman's suffrage, which scarcely received consideration in the constitutional convention of 1850-1851, was presented at length in the convention in session twenty-three years later. Alvin C. Voris, delegate from Summit County, appeared as leading champion of the cause. His eloquent and extended address is full of interest. Among other things he said: "Whatever tends to elevate woman tends to better society. The practical recognition of her rights and powers, as a human being, as a citizen, tends to elevate her. The conclusion is obvious. No wise man will think of depriving society of her potentialities for its melioration. "The exercise of the elective franchise has elevated every class of persons properly exercising it. Like wealth, power, intelligence and all the civilizing agencies, it has made society better, and the individual exercising it a more exalted being, capable of higher accomplishment. * * * "The necessity of reform is the conviction of the hour. The abuses of the privileges of the elector are fearfully undermining our social system. May not the self-restraint of woman be an important element in this reform ? * * * "Her truly endearing qualities are inherent in her very nature and would continue to be hers, just as man's continue to be his, though she should have a larger field of duty and privilege open to her, which will be exalted as she is exalted or lessened as she is sunk in the scale of being. "Woman will vote. The decree has gone forth, backed by the growing reason, sense of justice and generous intelligence of the age. Many of you will live to see and bless the day that enfranchised the most lovable and virtuous half of our people." To the speech of Mr. Voris, Thomas W. Powell, the venerable delegate from Delaware County, made a carefully prepared reply. Those interested in the study of the history of this subject will find both addresses well worth reading in full. Volney G. Dorsey, delegate from Miami County, thus summed up his argument against the proposed re form : "Christianity, built upon the family relation, has brought woman to this elevated, this glorious position, in which she is at once a blessing to herself and to all around her. Remove her from this, and I care not what you add to her, her moral influence is gone and gone forever. The ballot can not compensate for the loss of the influence of the home ; official position can never repay her for the loss of that greater kingdom which must be thrown away when the sanctity of the family relation is invaded by the duties and responsibilities of political station." There was much interesting discussion of the proposition to elect judges of the Supreme Court by proportional suffrage. The proposed plan permitted any elector to vote for only three of the five judges to be chosen. Gen. Thomas Ewing, who favored this, summed up the objection to the plan in his answer as follows : "The charge against this method that it increases the power of the [political] convention in the choice of judges, has been presented in its most plausible form, as follows : 'The two great parties will each nomi- - 72 - CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION OF OHIO - 73 nate three of the five judges of the Supreme Court. Two of each three so nominated will surely be elected, and only one of six nominees defeated. Hence either party may nominate three very bad men with a certainty of electing two.' But, I answer, the majority in a state will not lose a judgeship by bad nominations if they can help it, any more than under the present system ; and a party when in the minority, will seek then as now to recover their power by good nominations. There will be exactly the same rivalry of party and effort to make good nominations and elect the nominees." Another delegate favored the system of proportional voting because it would secure to the minority its rights. On this theme he said : "What are these rights ? First and above all others, the right of a voice in the government, not an absolutely controlling voice, but a voice that can be heard in council and that may be effective so far as the power of just opinion can become so. This is all that is asked and with nothing less should a free people be satisfied." TAXATION The committee on revenue and taxation made its report March 12, 1874. These were many opinions, some of them at wide variance, on Section 3 which was originally reported as follows : "Laws shall be passed taxing by equitable and uniform rules all real and personal property, so that all property shall bear an equal share of the burdens of taxation according to its true value in money, but providing against double taxation." In explanation of this section the chairman of the committee offered the following : "It is evident that the clause 'equitable and uniform rule' was intended and does confer on the General Assembly a larger legislative discretion in the adjustment of the general system of taxation than it possessed when but a single rule, and that uniform and inflexible, limited its action. But the question arose in our consultation, and in my judgment is still unsettled, as to how far such legislation can co-exist with and be exercised in the faith of a subsequent clause in the same section, which requires all property on its appraised value in money to share equally the burdens of taxation. * * * Whatever may be our difference of opinion this section clearly means, to some extent, a departure from the past policy of the state as to taxation. * * * The State of Pennsylvania in framing her constitution adopted the idea probably intended. to be embraced substantially in this amendment to the section of our old constitution. It is that by implication a classification of the property of the state might be obtained." Another member offered a more concise and definite explanation : "I am aware that we shall be asked what is meant in this section by the adjectives 'uniform' and 'equitable' as applied to the rules by which the real and personal property of the state is to be taxed. In ordinary use the word uniform has a more definite meaning than equitable' ; but my own construction of them, as we use them in this connection, is that the equality shall apply to the proper classification of the different subjects and classes of property sought to be taxed, and the uniformity. shall obtain in the equality of taxation throughout the state of all the property in the same class—variable as to class but uniform as to the rate of tax on each class. That is my definition and if it means less than that I shall oppose it." As will be seen the contest was between those who believed in the classification of property for the purposes of taxation and their opponents who favored the iron-clad uniform rule. The section submitted was a compromise of a not very satisfactory character. It was amended until it finally took the still more unsatisfactory form : "Laws shall be passed taxing, by uniform rate, all real and personal 74 - HISTORY OF OHIO property according to its value in money, to be ascertained by such rules of appraisement as may be prescribed by the General Assembly, so that all property shall bear an equal proportion of the burdens of taxation, provided that the deduction of debts from credits may be authorized." This somewhat indefinite and contradictory provision left matters substantially as they were under the inflexible uniform rule of the old constitution. Nothing practical resulted from months of discussion on this subject. LICENSE Much interest attaches to the action of the convention on the regulation of the traffic in intoxicating liquors. The friends of the license system, as already noted, waged an active campaign in favor of holding the convention. They believed that they were strong enough to outvote their opponents and looked forward with confident anticipation to the opportunity to exhibit their strength. The discussions in the convention turned chiefly on the form in which the question should be submitted to a vote. It was early agreed that it should be submitted, not as a part of the constitution, but as a separate and distinct proposition. The constitution of 1851, as we have seen, prohibited the licensing of the sale of intoxicating liquors. In criticising this provision, George Hoadly, delegate from Hamilton County, expressed his regret that he had in 1851 voted against license. "I have been a penitent ever since," he said, "and shall be to the end of my days. One of those mistakes was in inaugurating free trade in whiskey, by forbidding the license system, thus preventing the state from realizing that large tax upon the traffic which would be, in some measure, a compensation for the evils and mischief it works." The delegates from the large cities favored the license system. On the whole the sentiment of the convention seems to have run pretty strongly in the same direction. As in the convention of 1850-1851, however, there were among the members those who wished to occupy, as nearly as possible, neutral ground on this question. Many insisted that the license system would close a large proportion of the saloons of the state. "I tell you," said a prominent delegate, "that under a well restricted license system, backed up by the public sentiment of the state, you can close nineteen-twentieths of all the saloons with all their attendant evils, a thing you can never effect under a mere effervescence of public opinion." Among those who presented the opposite view was Anson Pease, delegate from Stark County, who declared : "If 3,000 rum and gin-shop keepers of this city [Cincinnati] supposed that they were to be thrown out of employment, that their occupation would be gone if this license system were adopted, do you think that they would be clamoring before you for a license? It is understood by them and their friends that when you go to the Legislature the question will be, who shall give the cheapest license, $2, $3, or some other trifling sum, which shall give them an opportunity to sell whiskey to be drunk where sold. That is just what they desire to make the system respectable. There are many pious people in the trade, and they do not want their business to be made contraband and disreputable; they do not wish to expose themselves to prosecution, and they desire to make it just as popular for them as it is possible to make it. I am not in favor of any such thing." On this subject Samuel F. Hunt of Hamilton County said : "Sumptuary legislation has never resulted in any permanent good. The constitution of 1851 prohibits the granting of license by the General Assembly and yet intemperance has greatly increased in our midst. We have liberty without license. We should have license with liberty. * * * "This is a question which will agitate itself ; like Banquo's ghost, it |